Classifying innovation districts: Delphi validation of a multidimensional framework

被引:17
作者
Adu-McVie, Rosemary [1 ]
Yigitcanlar, Tan [1 ]
Erol, Isil [2 ,3 ]
Xia, Bo [1 ]
机构
[1] Queensland Univ Technol, Sch Architecture & Built Environm, 2 George St, Brisbane, Qld 4000, Australia
[2] Queensland Univ Technol, Sch Econ & Finance, 2 George St, Brisbane, Qld 4000, Australia
[3] Univ Reading, Henley Business Sch, Dept Real Estate & Planning, Reading, Berks, England
关键词
Innovation district; Classification framework; Feature; Function; Space use and design; Knowledge and innovation economy; PLACE QUALITY; KNOWLEDGE; CITY; CONSENSUS; SUSTAINABILITY; INDICATORS; TYPOLOGY; LESSONS; SYSTEMS; MATTER;
D O I
10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105779
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Establishing innovation districts is a highly popular urban policy due to the economic, social and spatial benefits they offer to the host city. Investing on innovation districts is a risky business as there is no one-size-fit-all innovation district type. Besides, there only exists limited understanding on the varying features, functions and spatial and contextual characteristics of this new land use type. This study aims to contribute to the efforts in classifying innovation districts holistically through a multidimensional framework. The study builds on a conceptual framework developed by the authors and expands it into an operational framework that consists of numerous attributes-i.e., four dimensions (context, form, feature, function), 16 indicators and 48 measures. The framework and its attributes are subjected to validation by a panel of 32 experts through an international Delphi survey. This paper reports the process of framework development and validation. The resulting multidimensional innovation classification framework is first of its kind. It is useful in determining the key characteristics of existing innovation districts, helps in understanding what works in certain locations and what does not, and informs decisions of policymakers in investing the type of innovation districts suitable for the local context.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 81 条
[1]  
Alawadi K., 2016, J URBAN, V9, P276, DOI [10.1080/17549175.2015.1045924, DOI 10.1080/17549175.2015.1045924]
[2]   Environmental knowledge spillovers and productivity: A patent analysis for large international firms in the energy, water and land resources fields [J].
Aldieri, Luigi ;
Makkonen, Teemu ;
Vinci, Concetto Paolo .
RESOURCES POLICY, 2020, 69 (69)
[3]   Factors Explaining the Spatial Agglomeration of the Creative Class: Empirical Evidence for German Artists [J].
Alfken, Christoph ;
Broekel, Tom ;
Sternberg, Rolf .
EUROPEAN PLANNING STUDIES, 2015, 23 (12) :2438-2463
[4]   Evaluating key risk factors for PPP water projects in Ghana: a Delphi study [J].
Ameyaw, Ernest ;
Chan, Albert .
JOURNAL OF FACILITIES MANAGEMENT, 2015, 13 (02) :133-+
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2015, JOITMC, DOI DOI 10.1186/S40852-015-0015-7
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2010, KNOWLEDGE BASED DEV
[7]   Understanding current and future issues in collaborative consumption: A four-stage Delphi study [J].
Barnes, Stuart J. ;
Mattsson, Jan .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2016, 104 :200-211
[8]  
Baum S., 2007, ROLE COMMUNITY LIFES
[9]  
Carrillo FJ, 2014, ROUTL STUD HUM GEOGR, V52, P1
[10]   A typology of 'innovation districts': what it means for regional resilience [J].
Clark, Jennifer ;
Huang, Hsin-I ;
Walsh, John P. .
CAMBRIDGE JOURNAL OF REGIONS ECONOMY AND SOCIETY, 2010, 3 (01) :121-137