Political coalitions for mutual advantage: The case of the Tobacco Institute's labor management committee

被引:19
作者
Balbach, ED
Barbeau, EM
Manteufel, V
Pan, J
机构
[1] Tufts Univ, Community Hlth Program, Medford, MA 02155 USA
[2] Dana Farber Canc Inst, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Harvard Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Med Coll Wisconsin, Community Hlth Program, Milwaukee, WI 53226 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2105/AJPH.2004.052126
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
In 1984, the tobacco workers' union and the Tobacco Institute, which represents US tobacco companies, formed a labor management committee (LMC). The institute relied on LMC unions to resist smoke-free worksite rules. In a review of the internal tobacco industry documents now publicly available, we found that the LMC succeeded for 2 primary reasons. First, the LMC furthered members' interests, allowing them to overcome institutional barriers to policy success. Second, the LMC used an "institutions, ideas, and interests" strategy to encourage non-LMC unions to oppose smoke-free worksite rules. While public health advocates missed an opportunity to partner with unions on the issue of smoke-free worksites during the era studied, they can use a similar strategy to form coalitions with unions.
引用
收藏
页码:985 / 993
页数:9
相关论文
共 76 条
[51]  
*TOB I, 1999 TILMC BUDG
[52]  
*TOB I, PROP BUDG 1991
[53]  
*TOB I, TOB I 1985 BUDG SUMM
[54]  
*TOB I, 1990 PROP BUDG IND S
[55]  
*TOB I, TOB I PUBL AFF DIV P
[56]  
*TOB I, PUBL AFF DIV PROP 19
[57]  
*TOB I, FIN TILMC 1999 BUDG
[58]  
*TOB I, PUBL REL DIV 1986 PR
[59]  
*TOB I, TOB I 1992 BUDG PUBL
[60]  
*TOB I, TOB I 1993 BUDG PUBL