Political coalitions for mutual advantage: The case of the Tobacco Institute's labor management committee

被引:19
作者
Balbach, ED
Barbeau, EM
Manteufel, V
Pan, J
机构
[1] Tufts Univ, Community Hlth Program, Medford, MA 02155 USA
[2] Dana Farber Canc Inst, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Harvard Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Med Coll Wisconsin, Community Hlth Program, Milwaukee, WI 53226 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2105/AJPH.2004.052126
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
In 1984, the tobacco workers' union and the Tobacco Institute, which represents US tobacco companies, formed a labor management committee (LMC). The institute relied on LMC unions to resist smoke-free worksite rules. In a review of the internal tobacco industry documents now publicly available, we found that the LMC succeeded for 2 primary reasons. First, the LMC furthered members' interests, allowing them to overcome institutional barriers to policy success. Second, the LMC used an "institutions, ideas, and interests" strategy to encourage non-LMC unions to oppose smoke-free worksite rules. While public health advocates missed an opportunity to partner with unions on the issue of smoke-free worksites during the era studied, they can use a similar strategy to form coalitions with unions.
引用
收藏
页码:985 / 993
页数:9
相关论文
共 76 条
[1]  
*AFL CIO, SMOK WORKPL
[2]  
*AM NONSM RIGHTS F, 2004, OV LIST MAN LOC SMOK
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1995, Am J Public Health, V85, P183
[4]   Tobacco industry documents: comparing the Minnesota Depository and internet access [J].
Balbach, ED ;
Gasior, RJ ;
Barbeau, EM .
TOBACCO CONTROL, 2002, 11 (01) :68-72
[5]  
Barbeau E M, 1999, New Solut, V9, P65
[6]  
BIRNBAUM JH, 2004, WASH POST 1126, pE1
[7]  
CHILCOTE SD, COMMUNICATION
[8]  
DECONCINI J, COMMUNICATION
[9]   Tobacco industry efforts to present ventilation as an alternative to smoke-free environments in North America [J].
Drope, J ;
Bialous, SA ;
Glantz, SA .
TOBACCO CONTROL, 2004, 13 :41-47
[10]   Effect of smoke-free workplaces on smoking behaviour: systematic review [J].
Fichtenberg, CM ;
Glantz, SA .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2002, 325 (7357) :188-191