The basis of easy controllability in Boolean networks

被引:24
作者
Borriello, Enrico [1 ]
Daniels, Bryan C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Arizona State Univ, Sch Complex Adapt Syst, Tempe, AZ 85281 USA
关键词
HUMAN FIBROBLASTS; DIRECT CONVERSION; CELL; STABILITY; DYNAMICS; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1038/s41467-021-25533-3
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Boolean networks allow a simplified representation of interactions. Here, the authors systematically analyze regulation in dozens of biological Boolean networks, finding mathematical regularities that suggest biological systems could be controlled through a relatively small number of components. Effective control of biological systems can often be achieved through the control of a surprisingly small number of distinct variables. We bring clarity to such results using the formalism of Boolean dynamical networks, analyzing the effectiveness of external control in selecting a desired final state when that state is among the original attractors of the dynamics. Analyzing 49 existing biological network models, we find strong numerical evidence that the average number of nodes that must be forced scales logarithmically with the number of original attractors. This suggests that biological networks may be typically easy to control even when the number of interacting components is large. We provide a theoretical explanation of the scaling by separating controlling nodes into three types: those that act as inputs, those that distinguish among attractors, and any remaining nodes. We further identify characteristics of dynamics that can invalidate this scaling, and speculate about how this relates more broadly to non-biological systems.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   Control of Boolean networks: Hardness results and algorithms for tree structured networks [J].
Akutsu, Tatsuya ;
Hayashida, Morihiro ;
Ching, Wai-Ki ;
Ng, Michael K. .
JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, 2007, 244 (04) :670-679
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1998, Projective Geometry: From Foundations to Applications
[3]  
Anthony M., 1992, Proceedings of the Fifth Annual ACM Workshop on Computational Learning Theory, P311, DOI 10.1145/130385.130420
[4]   Structural Oscillatority Analysis of Boolean Networks [J].
Azuma, Shun-ichi ;
Yoshida, Takahiro ;
Sugie, Toshiharu .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CONTROL OF NETWORK SYSTEMS, 2019, 6 (02) :464-473
[5]   Cell phenotypes as macrostates of the GRN dynamics [J].
Borriello, Enrico ;
Walker, Sara, I ;
Laubichler, Manfred D. .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL ZOOLOGY PART B-MOLECULAR AND DEVELOPMENTAL EVOLUTION, 2020, 334 (04) :213-224
[6]  
Boveri T., 1906, ORGANISMEN ALS HISTO, V324
[7]   Petri net representation of multi-valued logical regulatory graphs [J].
Chaouiya, C. ;
Naldi, A. ;
Remy, E. ;
Thieffry, D. .
NATURAL COMPUTING, 2011, 10 (02) :727-750
[8]   Detecting cellular reprogramming determinants by differential stability analysis of gene regulatory networks [J].
Crespo, Isaac ;
Perumal, Thanneer M. ;
Jurkowski, Wiktor ;
del Sol, Antonio .
BMC SYSTEMS BIOLOGY, 2013, 7
[9]   Criticality Distinguishes the Ensemble of Biological Regulatory Networks [J].
Daniels, Bryan C. ;
Kim, Hyunju ;
Moore, Douglas ;
Zhou, Siyu ;
Smith, Harrison B. ;
Karas, Bradley ;
Kauffman, Stuart A. ;
Walker, Sara, I .
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2018, 121 (13)
[10]   Dynamical analysis of a generic Boolean model for the control of the mammalian cell cycle [J].
Faure, Adrien ;
Naldi, Aurelien ;
Chaouiya, Claudine ;
Thieffry, Denis .
BIOINFORMATICS, 2006, 22 (14) :E124-E131