Hybrid Constructed Wetland Selection as a Group Decision-Making Problem

被引:7
作者
Srdevic, Zorica [1 ]
Srdevic, Bojan [1 ]
Suvocarev, Kosana [2 ]
Galambos, Laslo [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Novi Sad, Dept Water Management, Grp Syst Anal & Decis Making, Fac Agr, Trg D Obradov 8, Novi Sad 21000, Serbia
[2] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Land Air & Water, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[3] Inst Nat Conservat Vojvodina Prov, Radnicka 22a, Novi Sad 21000, Serbia
关键词
Constructed wetland segmentation; Group decision-making; Analytic hierarchy process; Consistency; conformity measures; Visualization of decisions; WASTE-WATER TREATMENT; REMOVAL;
D O I
10.1007/s11269-019-02444-z
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
This paper proposes a framework based on the group analytic hierarchy process for identifying most desirable technologies for constructed wetland segmentation. A method is defined how to select decision makers whose evaluations should be included into the group decision by calculating different consistency and statistical conformity measures, and their aggregation into the new metrics. The consistency ratio, the total Euclidean distance, and the Spearman's rank correlation coefficient are used to create the three two-dimensional metrics and the one three-dimensional metric to determine the distances of the decision makers from the reference points corresponding to full consistency and statistical conformity. The mapping the decision makers into the consistency/conformity scatter plots enables visualizing the outlier(s), that is, the decision makers who have different opinions about which technologies to apply in wetland segmentation than the decision makers on average. The scatter plots may guide the decision-making process towards grouping the decision makers into sub groups, thus heading towards consensus in both sub groups and global group. The approach is demonstrated on a numerical example application in which five decision makers are assessing six criteria of a constructed wetland segmentation selection.
引用
收藏
页码:295 / 310
页数:16
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Visualizing group decisions in the analytic hierarchy process [J].
Condon, E ;
Golden, B ;
Wasil, E .
COMPUTERS & OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2003, 30 (10) :1435-1445
[2]   A visualization model based on adjacency data [J].
Condon, E ;
Golden, B ;
Lele, S ;
Raghavan, S ;
Wasil, E .
DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 2002, 33 (04) :349-362
[3]   Wastewater and Rainwater Management in Urban Areas: A Role for Constructed Wetlands [J].
Dou, Tiantian ;
Troesch, Stephane ;
Petitjean, Alain ;
Gabor, Palfy Tamas ;
Esser, Dirk .
GREEN URBANISM (GU), 2017, 37 :535-541
[4]   Aggregating individual judgments and priorities with the Analytic Hierarchy Process [J].
Forman, E ;
Peniwati, K .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1998, 108 (01) :165-169
[5]   Seasonal applicability of three vegetation constructed floating treatment wetlands for nutrient removal and harvesting strategy in urban stormwater retention ponds [J].
Ge, Zhigang ;
Feng, Cuimin ;
Wang, Xianping ;
Zhang, Jibiao .
INTERNATIONAL BIODETERIORATION & BIODEGRADATION, 2016, 112 :80-87
[6]  
Gibbons J. D., 1971, NONPARAMETRIC STAT I
[7]  
Gikas G.D., 2014, Water Utility Journal, V8, P57
[8]   A MULTICRITERIA EVALUATION OF METHODS FOR OBTAINING WEIGHTS FROM RATIO-SCALE MATRICES [J].
GOLANY, B ;
KRESS, M .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1993, 69 (02) :210-220
[9]   Multiperson decision-making based on multiplicative preference relations [J].
Herrera, F ;
Herrera-Viedma, E ;
Chiclana, F .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2001, 129 (02) :372-385
[10]   How effective are created or restored freshwater wetlands for nitrogen and phosphorus removal? A systematic review [J].
Land M. ;
Granéli W. ;
Grimvall A. ;
Hoffmann C.C. ;
Mitsch W.J. ;
Tonderski K.S. ;
Verhoeven J.T.A. .
Environmental Evidence, 5 (1)