Isolated single umbilical artery: need for specialist fetal echocardiography?

被引:21
作者
Defigueiredo, D. [1 ]
Dagklis, T. [1 ]
Zidere, V. [1 ]
Allan, L. [1 ]
Nicolaides, K. H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Kings Coll Hosp, Harris Birthright Res Ctr Fetal Med, Sch Med, London SE5 8RX, England
关键词
cardiac defect; fetal echocardiography; prenatal diagnosis; single umbilical artery; ultrasound; NUCHAL-TRANSLUCENCY THICKNESS; CHROMOSOMAL DEFECTS; PRENATAL-DIAGNOSIS; MATERNAL AGE; MATTER; RISK; TRISOMY-21; GESTATION; PREGNANCY; ANOMALIES;
D O I
10.1002/uog.7711
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Objective To examine the association between single umbilical artery (SUA) and cardiac defects and to determine whether patients with SUA require specialist fetal echocardiography. Methods Incidence and type of cardiac defects were determined in fetuses with SUA detected at routine second-trimester ultrasound examination. Results A routine second-trimester scan was performed in 46 272 singleton pregnancies at a median gestation of 22 (range, 18-25) weeks and an SUA was diagnosed in 246 (0.5%). Cardiac defects were diagnosed in 16 (6.5%) of these cases, including 10 (4.3%) in a subgroup of 233 with no other defects and in six (46.2%) of the 13 with multiple defects. In 11 (68.8%) of the 16 cases with cardiac defects the condition was readily diagnosable by evaluating the standard four-chamber view and the views of the great arteries. In the remaining cases there was left persistent superior vena cava or small ventricular septal defect, where prenatal diagnosis may not be important because they are not associated with adverse outcome. Conclusion Although SUA is associated with an increased incidence of cardiac defects it may not be necessary to refer such patients for specialist fetal echocardiography because the defects are detectable by evaluating standard cardiac views that should be part of the routine second-trimester scan. Copyright (C) 2010 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:553 / 555
页数:3
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   SINGLE UMBILICAL ARTERY - DOES IT MATTER WHICH ARTERY IS MISSING [J].
ABUHAMAD, AZ ;
SHAFFER, W ;
MARI, G ;
COPEL, JA ;
HOBBINS, JC ;
EVANS, AT .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1995, 173 (03) :728-732
[2]  
Blazer S, 1997, PRENATAL DIAG, V17, P5, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0223(199701)17:1<5::AID-PD999>3.0.CO
[3]  
2-4
[4]  
Budorick NE, 2001, J ULTRAS MED, V20, P619
[5]   PRENATAL-DIAGNOSIS OF THE 2-VESSEL CORD - IMPLICATIONS FOR PATIENT COUNSELING AND OBSTETRIC MANAGEMENT [J].
CATANZARITE, VA ;
HENDRICKS, SK ;
MAIDA, C ;
WESTBROOK, C ;
COUSINS, L ;
SCHRIMMER, D .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 1995, 5 (02) :98-105
[6]   Frequency and nature of structural anomalies in fetuses with single umbilical arteries [J].
Chow, JS ;
Benson, CB ;
Doubilet, PM .
JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 1998, 17 (12) :765-768
[7]   Prenatal diagnosis of single umbilical artery: determination of the absent side, associated anomalies, Doppler findings and perinatal outcome [J].
Geipel, A ;
Germer, U ;
Welp, T ;
Schwinger, E ;
Gembruch, U .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 15 (02) :114-117
[8]   Antenatal detection of a single umbilical artery: does it matter? [J].
Gornall, AS ;
Kurinczuk, JJ ;
Konje, JC .
PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2003, 23 (02) :117-123
[9]   Antenatal diagnosis of single umbilical artery: Is fetal echocardiography warranted? [J].
Gossett, DR ;
Lantz, ME ;
Chisholm, CA .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 100 (05) :903-908
[10]  
Granese Roberta, 2007, Ultrasound Q, V23, P117, DOI 10.1097/01.ruq.0000263848.07808.02