Population agglomeration and the effectiveness of enterprise subsidies: a Chinese analysis

被引:16
作者
Deng, Kebin [1 ]
Ding, Zhong [2 ]
Xu, Mingli [3 ]
机构
[1] South China Univ Technol, Sch Econ & Commerce, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Guangdong Univ Foreign Studies, Sch Accounting, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[3] South China Normal Univ, Sch Polit & Publ Adm, Guangzhou Higher Educ Mega Ctr, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
关键词
technological innovation; government subsidies; population agglomeration; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; INNOVATION; DENSITY; PRODUCTIVITY; BARRIERS; CITIES;
D O I
10.1080/00343404.2019.1681586
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper investigates the impact of population agglomeration on the relation between government subsidies and firm innovation. It constructs a parsimonious model to show that the positive effect of government subsidies on innovation by small-cap enterprises should be pronounced only in regions with higher population densities. Moreover, using the 'mass entrepreneurship and innovation' policy implemented by the Chinese government in 2015, and the resulting boost in government subsidies to small-cap enterprises as a natural experiment, the paper confirms the theoretical prediction and demonstrates that population density strengthens the positive relationship between government subsidies and firm innovation in small-cap enterprises. When the population density of a region is below a certain threshold (1100 people/km(2)), the positive connection between government subsidies and technological innovation disappears.
引用
收藏
页码:1136 / 1148
页数:13
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   PRODUCTIVITY AND THE DENSITY OF HUMAN CAPITAL* [J].
Abel, Jaison R. ;
Dey, Ishita ;
Gabe, Todd M. .
JOURNAL OF REGIONAL SCIENCE, 2012, 52 (04) :562-586
[2]   Two for the price of one? Additionality effects of R&D subsidies: A comparison between Flanders and Germany [J].
Aerts, Kris ;
Schmidt, Tobias .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2008, 37 (05) :806-822
[3]   Innovation and Institutional Ownership [J].
Aghion, Philippe ;
Van Reenen, John ;
Zingales, Luigi .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2013, 103 (01) :277-304
[4]  
Almeida H., 2013, Less is More: Financial Constraints and Innovative Efficiency, DOI [10.2139/ssrn.1831786, DOI 10.2139/SSRN.1831786]
[5]  
Arrow K., 1962, RATE DIRECTION INVEN, P609
[6]   PUBLIC R&D POLICIES AND PRIVATE R&D INVESTMENT: A SURVEY OF THE EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE [J].
Becker, Bettina .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC SURVEYS, 2015, 29 (05) :917-942
[7]  
BLANK D.M., 1957, The Demand and Supply of Scientific Personnel
[8]   The allocation and effectiveness of China's R&D subsidies - Evidence from listed firms [J].
Boeing, Philipp .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2016, 45 (09) :1774-1789
[9]   The impact of R&D subsidies on firm innovation [J].
Bronzini, Raffaello ;
Piselli, Paolo .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2016, 45 (02) :442-457
[10]   Are Incentives for R&D Effective? Evidence from a Regression Discontinuity Approach [J].
Bronzini, Raffaello ;
Iachini, Eleonora .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-ECONOMIC POLICY, 2014, 6 (04) :100-134