Realistic Approach for Phasor Measurement Unit Placement: Consideration of Practical Hidden Costs

被引:62
|
作者
Rather, Zakir Hussain [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Zhe [2 ]
Thogersen, Paul [1 ]
Lund, Per [3 ]
Kirby, Brian [4 ]
机构
[1] Kk Elect AS, Innovat Ctr, DK-9220 Aalborg, Denmark
[2] Aalborg Univ, Dept Energy Technol, DK-9220 Aalborg, Denmark
[3] Energinet Dk, Danish TSO, DK-7000 Fredericia, Denmark
[4] Substat Automat Solut, ALSTOM GRID, Stafford ST17 4LX, England
关键词
KCL; KVL; optimal placement of PMUs; phasor measurement units (PMUs); power system observability; OPTIMAL PMU PLACEMENT; OBSERVABILITY; FORMULATION;
D O I
10.1109/TPWRD.2014.2335059
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
This paper presents a realistic cost-effective model for optimal placement of phasor measurement units (PMUs) for complete observability of a power system considering practical cost implications. The proposed model considers hidden or otherwise unaccounted practical costs involved in PMU installation. Consideration of these hidden but significant and integral part of total PMU installation costs was inspired from practical experience on a real-life project. The proposed model focuses on the minimization of total realistic costs instead of a widely used theoretical concept of a minimal number of PMUs. The proposed model has been applied to IEEE 14-bus, IEEE 24-bus, IEEE 30-bus, New England 39-bus, and large power system of 300 buses and real life Danish grid. A comparison of the presented results with those reported by traditional methods has also been shown to justify the effectiveness of the proposed model with regard to its realistic and practical nature.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 15
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] An Integer Linear Programming Approach for Phasor Measurement Unit Placement
    Ferraz, Renato S. F.
    Ferraz, Rafael S. F.
    Rueda-Medina, Augusto C.
    Paiva, Marcia H. M.
    2021 IEEE URUCON, 2021, : 108 - 112
  • [2] Phasor Measurement Unit Placement Algorithm
    Kulkarni, S.
    Allen, A.
    Santoso, S.
    Grady, W. M.
    2009 IEEE POWER & ENERGY SOCIETY GENERAL MEETING, VOLS 1-8, 2009, : 1347 - 1352
  • [3] Multistage Optimal Placement of Phasor Measurement Unit
    Shyam, Chaw Chuaong
    Rabha, Papu
    Sinha, Ashoke Kumar
    2015 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENERGY, POWER AND ENVIRONMENT: TOWARDS SUSTAINABLE GROWTH (ICEPE), 2015,
  • [4] the Method of Optimal Phasor Measurement Unit Placement
    Zhang Wen-jun
    Xu Jian-jun
    Xing Long
    ADVANCES IN APPLIED SCIENCE AND INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGY, PTS 1 AND 2, 2013, 798-799 : 298 - +
  • [5] General optimal substation coverage algorithm for phasor measurement unit placement in practical systems
    Pal, Anamitra
    Mishra, Chetan
    Vullikanti, Anil Kumar S.
    Ravi, S. S.
    IET GENERATION TRANSMISSION & DISTRIBUTION, 2017, 11 (02) : 347 - 353
  • [6] Double Contingency Consideration in Phasor Measurement Unit Placement Using MSFLA Based on Pareto Method
    Nosratabadi, Seyyed Mostafa
    Nasri, Mohammad Hosein
    Modarresi, Javad
    2015 INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON ELECTRIC INDUSTRY AUTOMATION (ICEIA 2015), 2015, : 27 - 32
  • [7] Phasor measurement unit placement based on incomplete observability
    Nuqui, RF
    Phadke, AG
    2002 IEEE POWER ENGINEERING SOCIETY SUMMER MEETING, VOLS 1-3, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, 2002, : 888 - 893
  • [8] A Brief Study on Optimal Placement of Phasor Measurement Unit
    Kaushal, Kajal
    Syal, Poonam
    Sinha, S. K.
    3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INNOVATIVE APPLICATIONS OF COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE ON POWER, ENERGY AND CONTROLS WITH THEIR IMPACT ON HUMANITY (CIPECH-18), 2018, : 215 - 220
  • [9] An improved optimal phasor measurement unit placement algorithm
    Li, Qiang
    Yu, Er-Keng
    Lü, Shi-Chao
    Pan, Yi
    Zhou, Jing-Yang
    Power System Technology, 2005, 29 (12) : 57 - 61
  • [10] Pragmatic approach for multistage phasor measurement unit placement: a case study of the Danish power system and inputs from practical experience
    Rather, Zakir H.
    Chen, Zhe
    Thogersen, Paul
    Lund, Per
    INTERNATIONAL TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTRICAL ENERGY SYSTEMS, 2016, 26 (12): : 2532 - 2551