Analysis of Lolium temulentum geographical differentiation by microsatellite and AFLP markers

被引:6
|
作者
Senda, T [1 ]
Saito, M [1 ]
Ohsako, T [1 ]
Tominaga, T [1 ]
机构
[1] Kyoto Prefectural Univ, Grad Sch Agr, Kyoto 6190244, Japan
关键词
AFLP; darnel; genetic diversity; geographical; differentiation; Lolium temulentum; micro satellites; origin;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-3180.2004.00420.x
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
The genetic diversity and relationships of 48 Lolium temulentum accessions derived from eight countries (Morocco, Egypt, Tunisia, Italy, Ethiopia, Pakistan, Nepal and Japan) were analysed using seven microsatellite and 44 AFLP polymorphic loci to investigate the origin and distribution of genetic variation. Cluster analysis was performed using the unweighted pair-group method with arithmetic averages (UPGMA) based on the simple matching coefficient of similarity. Nei's gene diversity (h) and the coefficient of gene differentiation (G(st)) were calculated. The results from microsatellite analysis indicated that accessions from the same country did not always cluster together, probably because of the limited number of loci used. In contrast, AFLP clearly separated clusters between countries and/or regions; Pakistan-Nepal complex, the Mediterranean region, Ethiopia and Japan. The h value was much higher for microsatellite than for AFLP analysis, indicating that microsatellites are the more variable markers. For AFLP analyses, h values were highest in accessions from Pakistan-Nepal complex, and from the Mediterranean region. These are in agreement with proposals that the origin of L. temulentum lies between the Southwestern Asia and the Mediterranean basin. The clear groupings of accessions from each country and/or region with high Gst (0.688) indicate that exchange of seeds between them is limited.
引用
收藏
页码:18 / 26
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Development of microsatellite markers and their effectiveness in Lolium temulentum
    Senda, T
    Kubo, N
    Hirai, M
    Tominaga, T
    WEED RESEARCH, 2004, 44 (02) : 136 - 141
  • [2] Microsatellite markers and genetic diversity assessment in Lolium temulentum
    Kirigwi, Francis M.
    Zwonitzer, John C.
    Mian, M. A. Rouf
    Wang, Zeng-Yu
    Saha, Malay C.
    GENETIC RESOURCES AND CROP EVOLUTION, 2008, 55 (01) : 105 - 114
  • [3] Microsatellite markers and genetic diversity assessment in Lolium temulentum
    Francis M. Kirigwi
    John C. Zwonitzer
    M. A. Rouf Mian
    Zeng-Yu Wang
    Malay C. Saha
    Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 2008, 55
  • [4] Assessment of genetic variation and differentiation of hop genotypes by microsatellite and AFLP markers
    Jakse, J
    Kindlhofer, K
    Javornik, B
    GENOME, 2001, 44 (05) : 773 - 782
  • [5] Transcriptome Analysis of Wounding in the Model Grass Lolium temulentum
    Dombrowski, James E.
    Kronmiller, Brent A.
    Hollenbeck, Vicky
    Martin, Ruth C.
    PLANTS-BASEL, 2020, 9 (06): : 1 - 28
  • [6] The comparison of RFLP, RAPD, AFLP and SSR (microsatellite) markers for germplasm analysis
    Powell, W
    Morgante, M
    Andre, C
    Hanafey, M
    Vogel, J
    Tingey, S
    Rafalski, A
    MOLECULAR BREEDING, 1996, 2 (03) : 225 - 238
  • [7] Genetic analysis of the grapevine cultivar 'picolit' based on microsatellite and AFLP markers
    Zulini, L
    Fabro, E
    Peterlunger, E
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GRAPE GENETICS AND BREEDING, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2003, (603): : 467 - 472
  • [8] Genetic analysis of scab resistance QTL in wheat with microsatellite and AFLP markers
    Zhou, WC
    Kolb, FL
    Bai, GH
    Shaner, G
    Domier, LL
    GENOME, 2002, 45 (04) : 719 - 727
  • [9] Potential global geographical distribution of Lolium temulentum L. under climate change
    Yang, Ming
    Zhao, Haoxiang
    Xian, Xiaoqing
    Liu, Hui
    Li, Jianyu
    Chen, Li
    Liu, Wanxue
    FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2022, 13
  • [10] Microsatellite and AFLP markers in an artichoke world collection
    Sonnante, G
    Ippedico, M
    De Paolis, A
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE VTH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON ARTICHOKE, 2004, (660): : 61 - 68