Advanced-step multistage nonlinear model predictive control: Robustness and stability

被引:18
作者
Yu, Zhou Joyce [1 ]
Biegler, Lorenz T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Dept Chem Engn, Ctr Adv Proc Decis Making, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
关键词
Robust nonlinear model predictive control; Real-time; Optimal control; Dynamic optimization; Stochastic programming; Sensitivity; INHERENT ROBUSTNESS; STATE STABILITY; SYSTEMS; ALGORITHM; INPUT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jprocont.2019.10.006
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Nonlinear model predictive control (NMPC) has been popular in many applications, especially when constraint satisfaction is critical. However, due to plant-model mismatch and disturbances, robust NMPC generally faces three challenges: robust performance, real-time implementation, and stability. In this paper, we propose a parallelizable advanced-step multistage NMPC (as-msNMPC), which provides a non-conservative robust control solution that explicitly addresses two types of uncertainty: model parameters and unmeasured noise. The first type is attended to by incorporating scenario trees and the second by applying nonlinear programming (NLP) sensitivity. In addition, robust stability concepts have been discussed for both ideal multistage NMPC (ideal-msNMPC) and as-msNMPC. Under suitable assumptions, as-msNMPC has demonstrated input-to-state practical stability properties with the presence of two types of uncertainty. Lastly, the as-msNMPC framework has been applied to continuous stirred tank reactor (CSTR) and quad-tank case studies for tracking setpoints to demonstrate its performance in robustness and efficiency. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:192 / 206
页数:15
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   On the inherent robustness of optimal and suboptimal nonlinear MPC [J].
Allan, Douglas A. ;
Bates, Cuyler N. ;
Risbeck, Michael J. ;
Rawlings, James B. .
SYSTEMS & CONTROL LETTERS, 2017, 106 :68-78
[2]  
[Anonymous], THESIS
[3]   Models and computational strategies for multistage stochastic programming under endogenous and exogenous uncertainties [J].
Apap, Robert M. ;
Grossmann, Ignacio E. .
COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2017, 103 :233-274
[4]   Scenario-based Model Predictive Control of Stochastic Constrained Linear Systems [J].
Bernardini, Daniele ;
Bemporad, Alberto .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 48TH IEEE CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL, 2009 HELD JOINTLY WITH THE 2009 28TH CHINESE CONTROL CONFERENCE (CDC/CCC 2009), 2009, :6333-6338
[5]  
Birge JR, 2011, SPRINGER SER OPER RE, P3, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-0237-4
[6]  
Campo P. J., 1987, Proceedings of the 1987 American Control Conference, P1021
[7]  
Fiacco A.V., 1983, Introduction to Sensitivity and Stability Analysis
[8]   SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS FOR NONLINEAR-PROGRAMMING USING PENALTY METHODS [J].
FIACCO, AV .
MATHEMATICAL PROGRAMMING, 1976, 10 (03) :287-311
[9]  
Findeisen R., 2004, PROC INT S ADV CONTR, P427, DOI DOI 10.1016/S1474-6670(17)38769-4
[10]  
Herceg M, 2006, IEEE INTL CONF CONTR, P1702