How digitalisation interacts with ecologisation? Perspectives from actors of the French Agricultural Innovation System

被引:39
作者
Schnebelin, Eleonore [1 ]
Labarthe, Pierre [2 ]
Touzard, Jean-Marc [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Montpellier, Inst Agro, INRAE, UMR Innovat,DigitAg, Montpellier, France
[2] Univ Toulouse, INRAE, AGIR, Castanet Tolosan, France
[3] Univ Montpellier, INRAE, UMR Innovat, 2 Pl Viala, F-34060 Montpellier, France
关键词
Digitalisation; Agriculture; DIgital technology; Agricultural innovation system; Organic farming; Institutional economics; Ecological transition; FOOD NETWORKS; LOCK-IN; TECHNOLOGIES; AGROECOLOGY; TRANSITIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.07.023
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
Two major agricultural transformations are currently being promoted worldwide: digitalisation and ecologisation, that include different practices such as organic farming and sustainable intensification. In literature and in societal debates, these two transformations are sometimes described as antagonistic and sometimes as convergent but are rarely studied together. Using an innovation system approach, this paper discusses how diverse ecologisation pathways grasp digitalisation in the French agricultural sector; and do not discriminate against organic farming. Based on interviews with key representatives of conventional agriculture, organic agriculture and organisations that promote or develop digital agriculture, we explore how these actors perceive and participate in digital development in agriculture. We show that although all the actors are interested and involved in digital development, behind this apparent convergence, organic and conventional actors perceive neither the same benefits nor the same risks and consequently do not implement the same innovation processes. We conclude that digitalisation has different meanings depending on the actors' paradigm, but that digital actors fail to perceive these differences. This difference in perception should be taken into account if digital development is to benefit all kinds of agriculture and not discriminate against organic farming and more widely, against agroecology.
引用
收藏
页码:599 / 610
页数:12
相关论文
共 93 条
[21]   Conventionalisation of organic farming practices: from structural criteria towards an assessment based on organic principles. A review [J].
Darnhofer, Ika ;
Lindenthal, Thomas ;
Bartel-Kratochvil, Ruth ;
Zollitsch, Werner .
AGRONOMY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2010, 30 (01) :67-81
[22]  
Djellal F., 1995, CHANGEMENT TECHNIQUE
[23]  
Dobrov G.M., 1979, REV INT SCI SOC, VXXXI, P628
[25]   Grasping the future of the digital society [J].
Dufva, Tomi ;
Dufva, Mikko .
FUTURES, 2019, 107 :17-28
[26]  
Dumez H., 2013, Methodologie de la recherche qualitative: les 10 questions cles de la demarche comprehensive
[27]   Transitions in agriculture: Three frameworks highlighting coexistence between a new agroecological configuration and an old, organic and conventional configuration of vegetable production in Wallonia (Belgium) [J].
Dumont, Antoinette M. ;
Gasselin, Pierre ;
Baret, Philippe V. .
GEOFORUM, 2020, 108 :98-109
[28]   Designing agroecological transitions; A review [J].
Duru, Michel ;
Therond, Olivier ;
Fares, M'hand .
AGRONOMY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2015, 35 (04) :1237-1257
[29]   Dynamics and distribution of public and private research and extension roles for technological innovation and diffusion: Case studies of the implementation and adaptation of precision farming technologies [J].
Eastwood, C. ;
Klerkx, L. ;
Nettle, R. .
JOURNAL OF RURAL STUDIES, 2017, 49 :1-12
[30]   Networks of practice for co-construction of agricultural decision support systems: Case studies of precision dairy farms in Australia [J].
Eastwood, C. R. ;
Chapman, D. F. ;
Paine, M. S. .
AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2012, 108 :10-18