Comparative evaluation of perioral soft tissue of skeletal normal Class I and Class II Division 1 subjects: A lateral cephalometric study

被引:1
作者
Khatri, Jeevan M. [1 ]
Sanap, Nikita Babasaheb [1 ]
机构
[1] CSMSS Dent Coll & Hosp, Dept Orthodont & Dentofacial Orthopaed, Aurangabad, Maharashtra, India
关键词
Perioral soft tissue; SN-MP angles; vertical pattern; MALOCCLUSION; POPULATION; THICKNESS; PROFILE; ADULTS;
D O I
10.4103/ijor.ijor_43_19
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate and compare shape variability of soft-tissue outline of skeletal Class II Division 1 patients with various vertical patterns (low, moderate, and high SN-MP angles) and skeletal normal Class I occlusion patients and to evaluate correlative skeletal and dental variables affecting soft-tissue thickness using cephalometric analysis. Materials and Methods: Sixty patients were selected with Class I normal occlusion and Class II Division 1 and divided into four groups based on horizontal and vertical skeletal pattern (SN-MP angles) on lateral cephalograms as Group I (normal occlusion), Group II-L (low angle <27<degrees>), Group II-N (normal angle 27 degrees -36 degrees), and Group II-H (high angle >= 37 degrees). The correlation and multiple linear regression analysis were used to determine skeletal and dental variables influencing soft tissue characteristics. Results: The skeletal Class II patients with a high mandibular plane angle had significantly greater values than the skeletal Class II patients with a low mandibular plane angle for basic lower lip thickness and lower lip length. The measurements in perioral soft-tissue thickness were correlated with an inclination of the upper and lower incisors along with facial depth and facial length in skeletal Class II Division 1 patients. Conclusion: Lip strain, lip thickness, and dental inclination must be evaluated based on various skeletal patterns for balanced perioral muscle activity.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 8
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Evaluation of the splint-supported Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device in skeletal Class II growing subjects
    Elkordy, Sherif A.
    Abdeldayem, Ramy
    Fayed, Mona M. S.
    Negm, Ibrahim
    El Ghoul, Dina
    Abouelezz, Amr M.
    ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2021, 91 (01) : 9 - 21
  • [42] Unpredictability of soft tissue changes after camouflage treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusion with maximum anterior retraction using miniscrews
    Kim, Kayoung
    Choi, Sung-Hwan
    Choi, Eun-Hee
    Choi, Yoon-Jeong
    Hwang, Chung-Ju
    Cha, Jung-Yul
    ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2017, 87 (02) : 230 - 238
  • [43] Comparison of surgical and non-surgical orthodontic treatment approaches on occlusal and cephalometric outcomes in patients with Class II Division I malocclusions
    Sheila Daniels
    Patrick Brady
    Arya Daniels
    Stacey Howes
    Kyungsup Shin
    Satheesh Elangovan
    Veerasathpurush Allareddy
    Progress in Orthodontics, 18
  • [44] Alveolar and dental arch morphology in Angle Class II division 2 malocclusion: a comparative study
    Balan, Raluca-Adriana
    Popa, George
    Bita, Romina
    Fabricky, Mihai
    Jivanescu, Anca
    Bratu, Dana Cristina
    ROMANIAN JOURNAL OF MORPHOLOGY AND EMBRYOLOGY, 2014, 55 (03) : 1093 - 1097
  • [45] Are Noffel's danger signs pathognomonic of class II division 2? A retrospective comparative study
    Fourneron, Manon
    Boutin, Francois
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHODONTICS, 2019, 17 (02) : 288 - 297
  • [46] Upper Airway Characteristics in Young Individuals With Class II Division 1 Malocclusion: A Retrospective Inter-Ethnic Cephalometric Comparison
    Al Ayoubi, Alaa
    Madlena, Melinda
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2021, 32 (08) : E761 - E763
  • [47] Early functional treatment in Class II division 1 subjects with mandibular retrognathia using Frankel II appliance. A prospective controlled study
    Silvestrini-Biavati, A.
    Alberti, G.
    Silvestrini-Biavati, F.
    Signori, A.
    Castaldo, A.
    Migliorati, M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAEDIATRIC DENTISTRY, 2012, 13 (04) : 301 - 306
  • [48] Comparison of arch width, alveolar width and buccolingual inclination of teeth between Class II division 1 malocclusion and Class I occlusion
    Shu, Rui
    Han, Xianglong
    Wang, Yating
    Xu, Hui
    Ai, Dongqing
    Wang, Lufei
    Wu, Yeke
    Bai, Ding
    ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2013, 83 (02) : 246 - 252
  • [49] Class II division 1 malocclusion treatment trends in the last 10 years by skeletal classification: A review article
    Ardani, I. G. A. W.
    Aini, Hanifa
    Narmada, Ida B.
    Deshmukh, Shailesh
    Nugraha, Alexander P.
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ORAL HEALTH, 2023, 15 (04): : 342 - 349
  • [50] Soft tissue effects of three different Class II/1-camouflage treatment strategies
    Atik, Ezgi
    Akarsu-Guven, Bengisu
    Kocadereli, Ilken
    JOURNAL OF OROFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS-FORTSCHRITTE DER KIEFERORTHOPADIE, 2017, 78 (02): : 153 - 165