Policy regime change against chronic deflation? Policy option under a long-term liquidity trap

被引:11
作者
Fujiwara, Ippei [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Nakazono, Yoshiyuki [4 ]
Ueda, Kozo [5 ]
机构
[1] RIETI, Tokyo, Japan
[2] Keio Univ, Tokyo 108, Japan
[3] Australian Natl Univ, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia
[4] Yokohama City Univ, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
[5] Waseda Univ, Tokyo, Japan
关键词
Monetary policy rule; Liquidity trap; Survey forecasts; MONETARY-POLICY; INTEREST-RATES; EXPECTATIONS; MODEL; END;
D O I
10.1016/j.jjie.2015.05.005
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The policy package known as Abenomics appears to have influenced the Japanese economy drastically, in particular, in the financial markets. In this paper, focusing on the aggressive monetary easing of Abenomics, the first arrow, we evaluate its role in guiding public perceptions on monetary policy stance through the management of expectations. In order to end chronic deflation, such as that which Japan has been suffering over the last two decades, policy regime change must be perceived by economic agents. Analysis using the QUICK survey system (QSS) monthly survey data shows that monetary policy reaction to inflation rates has been in a declining trend since the mid 2000s, implying intensified forward guidance well before Abenomics. However, Japan seems to have moved closer to a long-term liquidity trap, where even long-term bond yields are constrained by the zero lower bound. Consequently, no sizable difference in perceptions has been found before and after the introduction of Abenomics. Estimated changes in perceptions are not abrupt enough to satisfy "Sargent's (1982) criteria for regime change" termed by Eggertsson (2008). This poses a serious challenge to central banks: what is an effective policy option left under the long-term liquidity trap? RIM, Japan; Keio University, Japan; Australian National University, Australia; Yokohama City University, Japan; Waseda University, Japan. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:59 / 81
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A fiscal theory of monetary policy with partially-repaid long-term debt
    Cochrane, John H.
    REVIEW OF ECONOMIC DYNAMICS, 2022, 45 : 1 - 21
  • [22] Dose Changes for Long-term Opioid Patients Following a State Opioid Prescribing Policy
    Qiu, Sijia
    Liu, Yan
    Adetunji, Doyinsola O.
    Hartzell, Sarah
    Larson, Madalyn
    Friedman, Sarah
    MEDICAL CARE, 2023, 61 (10) : 657 - 664
  • [23] Stratified and nonstratified areas in the North Sea: Long-term variability and biological and policy implications
    van Leeuwen, Sonja
    Tett, Paul
    Mills, David
    van der Molen, Johan
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-OCEANS, 2015, 120 (07) : 4670 - 4686
  • [24] Dam break in Japan's immigration policy: the 2018 reform in a long-term perspective
    Chiavacci, David
    SOCIAL SCIENCE JAPAN JOURNAL, 2025, 28 (01)
  • [25] A New Medium and Long-Term Power Load Forecasting Method Considering Policy Factors
    Zhang, Bo
    Zhao, Xiaohan
    Dou, Zhenhai
    Liu, Lianxin
    IEEE ACCESS, 2021, 9 : 160021 - 160034
  • [26] Comment on Rudebusch and Williams, "A wedge in the dual mandate: Monetary policy and long-term unemployment"
    Lothian, James R.
    JOURNAL OF MACROECONOMICS, 2016, 47 : 19 - 25
  • [27] Assessment of soil erosion under long-term projections of climate change in Poland
    Marcinkowski, Pawel
    Szporak-Wasilewska, Sylwia
    Kardel, Ignacy
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2022, 607
  • [28] Short-term pain for long-term gain: Market deregulation and monetary policy in small open economies
    Cacciatore, Matteo
    Duval, Romain
    Fiori, Giuseppe
    Ghironi, Fabio
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MONEY AND FINANCE, 2016, 68 : 358 - 385
  • [29] Investigating the Effects of Monetary Policy Shocks on Growth and Inflation in Egypt: Asymmetry and the Long-term Impact
    Omar, Nadeen
    Yousri, Dina
    AFRICAN REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE-AREF, 2024, 16 (01): : 180 - 196
  • [30] Monetary policy and U.S. long-term interest rates: How close are the linkages?
    Berument, Hakan
    Froyen, Richard
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS, 2009, 61 (01) : 34 - 50