Molecular systematics of teioid lizards (Teioidea/Gymnophthalmoidea: Squamata) based on the analysis of 48 loci under tree-alignment and similarity-alignment

被引:87
作者
Goicoechea, Noemi [1 ]
Frost, Darrel R. [2 ]
De la Riva, Ignacio [1 ]
Pellegrino, Katia C. M. [3 ]
Sites, Jack, Jr. [4 ,5 ]
Rodrigues, Miguel T. [6 ]
Padial, Jose M. [7 ]
机构
[1] CSIC, Museo Nacl Ciencias Nat, Dept Biodivers & Evolutionary Biol, C Jose Gutierrez Abascal 2, E-28006 Madrid, Spain
[2] Amer Museum Nat Hist, Div Vertebrate Zool Herpetol, Cent Pk West & 79th St, New York, NY 10024 USA
[3] Univ Fed Sao Paulo, Dept Ciencias Biol, Ave Prof Artur Riedel 275, BR-09972270 Sao Paulo, Brazil
[4] Brigham Young Univ, Dept Biol, Provo, UT 84602 USA
[5] Brigham Young Univ, ML Bean Life Sci Museum, Provo, UT 84602 USA
[6] Univ Sao Paulo, Inst Biociencias, Dept Zool, BR-05508090 Sao Paulo, Brazil
[7] Carnegie Museum Nat Hist, Sect Amphibians & Reptiles, 4400 Forbes Ave, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
LEPOSOMA-PERCARINATUM SQUAMATA; MULTIPLE SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; BRANCH-SUPPORT VALUES; PHYLOGENETIC-RELATIONSHIPS; MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD; GYMNOPHTHALMUS-UNDERWOODI; EVOLUTIONARY HISTORY; TUPINAMBIS SAURIA; BANDING-PATTERNS; UNISEXUAL LIZARD;
D O I
10.1111/cla.12150
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
We infer phylogenetic relationships within Teioidea, a superfamily of Nearctic and Neotropical lizards, using nucleotide sequences. Phylogenetic analyses relied on parsimony under tree-alignment and similarity-alignment, with length variation (i.e. gaps) treated as evidence and as absence of evidence, and maximum-likelihood under similarity-alignment with gaps as absence of evidence. All analyses produced almost completely resolved trees despite 86% of missing data. Tree-alignment produced the shortest trees, the strict consensus of which is more similar to the maximum-likelihood tree than to any of the other parsimony trees, in terms of both number of clades shared, parsimony cost and likelihood scores. Comparisons of tree costs suggest that the pattern of indels inferred by similarity-alignment drove parsimony analyses on similarity-aligned sequences away from more optimal solutions. All analyses agree in a majority of clades, although they differ from each other in unique ways, suggesting that neither the criterion of optimality, alignment nor treatment of indels alone can explain all differences. Parsimony rejects the monophyly of Gymnophthalmidae due to the position of Alopoglossinae relative to Teiidae, whereas support of Gymnophthalmidae by maximum-likelihood was low. We address various nomenclatural issues, including Gymnophthalmidae Fitzinger, 1826 being an older name than Teiidae Gray, 1827. We recognize three families in the arrangement Alopoglossidae+(Teiidae+Gymnophthalmidae). Within Gymnophthalmidae we recognize Cercosaurinae, Gymnophthalminae, Rhachisaurinae and Riolaminae in the relationship Cercosaurinae+(Rhachisaurinae+(Riolaminae+Gymnophthalminae)). Cercosaurinae is composed of three tribesBachiini, Cercosaurini and Ecpleopodiniand Gymnophthalminae is composed of threeGymnophthalmini, Heterodactylini and Iphisini. Within Teiidae we retain the currently recognized three subfamilies in the arrangement: Callopistinae+(Tupinambinae+Teiinae). We also propose several genus-level changes to restore the monophyly of taxa.
引用
收藏
页码:624 / 671
页数:48
相关论文
共 216 条
[1]  
Abdala Virginia, 1999, Acta Zoologica Lilloana, V45, P99
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2011, MESQUITE MODULAR SYS
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1826, NEUE CLASSIFICATION, DOI DOI 10.5962/BHL.TITLE.4683
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1991, AMPHIBIANS REPTILES
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1999, Phylogenetic systematics
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1825, ANN PHILOS
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1885, CATALOGUE LIZARDS BR
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2006, GENETIC ALGORITHM AP
[9]  
[Anonymous], 1970, US NATL MUSEUM B, DOI DOI 10.5479/SI.03629236.297.1
[10]  
[Anonymous], 1985, B ZOOL NOMENCLATURE, V42, P130