HOW ENGINEERING DESIGN STUDENTS' CREATIVE PREFERENCES AND COGNITIVE STYLES IMPACT THEIR CONCEPT GENERATION AND SCREENING

被引:0
作者
Heininger, Katie [1 ]
Chen, Hong-En [1 ]
Jablokow, Kathryn [2 ]
Miller, Scarlett R. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, Dept Ind & Mfg Engn, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[2] Penn State Univ, Sch Engn Design Technol & Profess Programs, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME INTERNATIONAL DESIGN ENGINEERING TECHNICAL CONFERENCES AND COMPUTERS AND INFORMATION IN ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, 2018, VOL 7 | 2018年
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Engineering Design; Creativity; Idea Generation; Concept Selection; Concept Screening; Preferences for Creativity Scale (PCS); Kirton's Adaption-Innovation Inventory (KAI); PRODUCT ANALYSIS MATRIX; IDEA GENERATION; MODEL; RISK; AMBIGUITY; SELECTION; TEAMS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The flow of creative ideas throughout the engineering design process is essential for innovation. However, few studies have examined how individual traits affect problem-solving behaviors in an engineering design setting. Understanding these behaviors will enable us to guide individuals during the idea generation and concept screening phases of the engineering design process and help support the flow of creative ideas through this process. As a first step towards understanding these behaviors, we conducted an exploratory study with 19 undergraduate engineering students to examine the impact of individual traits, using the Preferences for Creativity Scale (PCS) and Kirton's Adaption-Innovation inventory (KAI), on the creativity of the ideas generated and selected for an engineering design task. The ideas were rated for their creativity, quality, and originality using Amabile's consensual assessment technique. Our results show that the PCS was able to predict students' propensity for creative concept screening, accounting for 74% of the variation in the model. Specifically, team centrality and influence and risk tolerance significantly contributed to the model. However, PCS was unable to predict idea generation abilities. On the other hand, cognitive style, as measured by KAI, predicted the generation of creative and original ideas, as well as one's propensity for quality concept screening, although the effect sizes were small. Our results provide insights into individual factors impacting undergraduate engineering students' idea generation and selection.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Idea generation, development and selection: a study of mechanical engineering students' natural approaches and the impact of hybrid learning blocks
    Lee, Jin Woo
    Daly, Shanna R.
    Vadakumcherry, Varghese
    Rodriguez, Gabriella
    DESIGN SCIENCE, 2023, 9
  • [42] Constructive simulation of creative concept generation process in design: a research method for difficult-to-observe design-thinking processes
    Taura, Toshiharu
    Yamamoto, Eiko
    Fasiha, Mohd Yusof Nor
    Goka, Masanori
    Mukai, Futoshi
    Nagai, Yukari
    Nakashima, Hideyuki
    JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING DESIGN, 2012, 23 (04) : 297 - 321
  • [43] Cognitive, collaborative, conceptual and creative - Four characteristics of the next generation of knowledge-based CAD systems: A study in biologically inspired design
    Goel, Ashok K.
    Vattam, Swaroop
    Wiltgen, Bryan
    Helms, Michael
    COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN, 2012, 44 (10) : 879 - 900
  • [44] The Impact of Design Thinking PBL Robot Course on College Students' Learning Motivation and Creative Thinking
    Kuo, Hsu-Chan
    Yang, Ya-Ting Carolyn
    Chen, Jung-San
    Hou, Ting-Wei
    Ho, Ming-Tzu
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EDUCATION, 2022, 65 (02) : 124 - 131
  • [45] The Impact of Blended Design-Based Learning for Multidisciplinary Cornerstone Design on Students' Motivation in Engineering
    Leung, Jac K. L.
    Chu, Samuel K. W.
    Ting Chuen Pong
    Lavigne, Paul D.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2021, 37 (02) : 550 - 563
  • [46] Active versus Passive Strategy in Online Creativity Training: How to Best Promote Creativity of Students with Different Cognitive Styles?
    Gu, Xiaojing
    Tan, Yafei
    Wu, Xiaofei
    Cai, Zhouqu
    Lai, Qing
    Cheng, Min
    Zhao, Qingbai
    THINKING SKILLS AND CREATIVITY, 2022, 44
  • [47] The impact of STEM curriculum on students' engineering design abilities and attitudes toward STEM
    Cheng, Meng-Fei
    Lo, Yu-Heng
    Cheng, Chi-Ho
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY AND DESIGN EDUCATION, 2024, 34 (5) : 1805 - 1833
  • [48] Virtual reality application influences cognitive load-mediated creativity components and creative performance in engineering design
    Chen, Yi-Ching
    Chang, Yu-Shan
    Chuang, Meng-Jung
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED LEARNING, 2022, 38 (01) : 6 - 18
  • [49] Work-in-Progress of Exploring High School Students' Science Concept During an Engineering Design Challenge
    Widiastuti, Indah
    Andry, Feby Eka Cipta Sari
    Budiyanto, Cucuk Wawan
    Akhyar, Muhammad
    2023 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON TEACHING, ASSESSMENT AND LEARNING FOR ENGINEERING, TALE, 2023, : 727 - 730
  • [50] Cognitive differences among first-year and senior engineering students when generating design solutions with and without additional dimensions of sustainability
    Hu, Mo
    Shealy, Tripp
    Milovanovic, Julie
    DESIGN SCIENCE, 2021, 7