Breast cancer risk with postmenopausal hormonal treatment

被引:118
作者
Collins, JA
Blake, JM
Crosignani, PG
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[2] Dalhousie Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Halifax, NS, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Sunnybrooks Womens Hosp, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Milan, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Milan, Italy
关键词
breast cancer; duration of use; estrogen; progestin; recency; relative risk;
D O I
10.1093/humupd/dmi028
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
This review was designed to determine from the best evidence whether there is an association between postmenopausal hormonal treatment and breast cancer risk. Also, if there is an association, does it vary according to duration and cessation of use, type of regimen, type of hormonal product or route of administration; whether there is a differential effect on risk of lobular and ductal cancer; and whether hormone treatment is associated with breast cancers that have better prognostic factors? Data sources for the review included Medline, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (Cochrane Library, 2005) and reference lists in the identified citations. Eligible citations addressed invasive breast cancer risk among postmenopausal women and involved use of the estrogen products with or without progestin that are used as treatment for menopausal symptoms. Abstracted data were demographic groupings, categories of hormone use, categories of breast cancer, two-by-two tables of exposure and outcome and adjusted odds ratios, relative risks (RRs) or hazard rates. Average estimates of risk were weighted by the inverse variance method, or if heterogeneous, using a random effects model. The average risk of invasive breast cancer with estrogen use was 0.79 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) = 0.61-1.02] in four randomized trials involving 12 643 women. The average breast cancer risk with estrogen-progestin use was 1.24 (95% CI = 1.03-1.50) in four randomized trials involving 19 756 women. The average risks reported in recent epidemiological studies were higher: 1.18 (95% CI = 1.01-1.38) with current use of estrogen alone and 1.70 (95% CI = 1.36-2.17) with current use of estrogen-progestin. The association of breast cancer with current use was stronger than the association with ever use, which includes past use. For past use, the increased breast cancer risk diminished soon after discontinuing hormones and normalized within 5 years. Reasonably adequate data do not show that breast cancer risk varies significantly with different types of estrogen or progestin preparations, lower dosages or different routes of administration, although there is a small difference between sequential and continuous progestin regimens. Epidemiological studies indicate that estrogen-progestin use increases risk of lobular more than ductal breast cancer, but the number of studies and cases of lobular cancer remains limited. Among important prognostic factors, the stage and grade in breast cancers associated with hormone do not differ significantly from those in non-users, but breast cancers in estrogen-progestin users are significantly more likely to be estrogen receptor (ER) positive. In conclusion, valid evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) indicates that breast cancer risk is increased with estrogen-progestin use more than with estrogen alone. Epidemiological evidence involving more than 1.5 million women agrees broadly with the trial findings. Although new studies are unlikely to alter the key findings about overall breast cancer risk, research is needed, however, to determine the role of progestin, evaluate the risk of lobular cancer and delineate effects of hormone use on receptor presence, prognosis and mortality in breast cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:545 / 560
页数:16
相关论文
共 77 条
  • [61] Menopausal estrogen and estrogen-progestin replacement therapy and breast cancer risk
    Schairer, C
    Lubin, J
    Troisi, R
    Sturgeon, S
    Brinton, L
    Hoover, R
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2000, 283 (04): : 485 - 491
  • [62] Classification and pharmacology of progestins
    Schindler, AE
    Campagnoli, C
    Druckmann, R
    Huber, J
    Pasqualini, JR
    Schweppe, KW
    Thijssen, JHH
    [J]. MATURITAS, 2003, 46 : S7 - S16
  • [64] The role of hormone replacement therapy in the risk for breast cancer and total mortality in women with a family history of breast cancer
    Sellers, TA
    Mink, PJ
    Cerhan, JR
    Zheng, W
    Anderson, KE
    Kushi, LH
    Folsom, AR
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1997, 127 (11) : 973 - 980
  • [65] Rating the risk factors for breast cancer
    Singletary, SE
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2003, 237 (04) : 474 - 482
  • [66] Exogenous progestagens and the human breast
    Sitruk-Ware, R
    Plu-Bureau, G
    [J]. MATURITAS, 2004, 49 (01) : 58 - 66
  • [67] Oestrogen receptor β:: what it means for patients with breast cancer
    Speirs, V
    Carder, PJ
    Lane, S
    Dodwell, D
    Lansdown, MR
    Hanby, AM
    [J]. LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2004, 5 (03) : 174 - 181
  • [68] Breast cancer with different prognostic characteristics developing in Danish women using hormone replacement therapy
    Stahlberg, C
    Pedersen, AT
    Andersen, ZJ
    Keiding, N
    Hundrup, YA
    Obel, EB
    Moller, S
    Rank, F
    Ottesen, B
    Lynge, E
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2004, 91 (04) : 644 - 650
  • [69] Increased risk of breast cancer following different regimens of hormone replacement therapy frequently used in Europe
    Stahlberg, C
    Pedersen, AT
    Lynge, E
    Andersen, ZJ
    Keiding, N
    Hundrup, YA
    Obel, EB
    Ottesen, B
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2004, 109 (05) : 721 - 727
  • [70] Effect of hormone replacement therapy on the pathological stage of breast cancer: population based, cross sectional study
    Stallard, S
    Litherland, JC
    Cordiner, C
    Dobson, HM
    George, WD
    Mallon, EA
    Hole, D
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 320 (7231) : 348 - 349