BI-RADS categorisation of 2708 consecutive nonpalpable breast lesions in patients referred to a dedicated breast care unit

被引:13
作者
Hamy, A. -S. [1 ]
Giacchetti, S. [1 ]
Albiter, M. [2 ]
de Bazelaire, C. [2 ]
Cuvier, C. [1 ]
Perret, F. [1 ]
Bonfils, S. [1 ]
Charveriat, P. [1 ]
Hocini, H. [1 ]
de Roquancourt, A. [3 ]
Espie, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Paris 07, Breast Dis Ctr, St Louis Hosp, AP HP, F-75010 Paris, France
[2] Univ Paris 07, Radiol Unit, St Louis Hosp, AP HP, F-75010 Paris, France
[3] Univ Paris 07, Dept Pathol, St Louis Hosp, AP HP, F-75010 Paris, France
关键词
Biopsy/needle/methods; Breast neoplasms/diagnosis; Breast diseases/classification; Mammography/classification; Breast diseases/ultrasound; Ultrasound; Mammary/classification; POSITIVE PREDICTIVE-VALUE; CORE NEEDLE-BIOPSY; DATA SYSTEM; MAMMOGRAPHIC FEATURES; OBSERVER VARIABILITY; AMERICAN-COLLEGE; FINAL ASSESSMENT; COMMUNITY; US; MICROCALCIFICATIONS;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-011-2201-8
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
To determine the malignancy rate of nonpalpable breast lesions, categorised according to the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) classification in the setting of a Breast Care Unit. All nonpalpable breast lesions from consecutive patients referred to a dedicated Breast Care Unit were prospectively reviewed and classified into 5 BI-RADS assessment categories (0, 2, 3, 4, and 5). A total of 2708 lesions were diagnosed by mammography (71.6%), ultrasound (8.7%), mammography and ultrasound (19.5%), or MRI (0.2%). The distribution of the lesions by BI-RADS category was: 152 in category 0 (5.6%), 56 in category 2 (2.1%), 742 in category 3 (27.4%), 1523 in category 4 (56.2%) and 235 in category 5 (8.7%). Histology revealed 570 malignant lesions (32.9%), 152 high-risk lesions (8.8%), and 1010 benign lesions (58.3%). Malignancy was detected in 17 (2.3%) category 3 lesions, 364 (23.9%) category 4 lesions and 185 (78.7%) category 5 lesions. Median follow-up was 36.9 months. This pragmatic study reflects the assessment and management of breast impalpable abnormalities referred for care to a specialized Breast Unit. Multidisciplinary evaluation with BI-RADS classification accurately predicts malignancy, and reflects the quality of management. This assessment should be encouraged in community practice appraisal.
引用
收藏
页码:9 / 17
页数:9
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
*AM COLL RAD, 2003, AM COLL RAD ACR BREA
[2]  
*ANAES, 2002, SERV REC REF PROF AN
[3]   Sonography of solid breast lesions: Observer variability of lesion description and assessment [J].
Baker, JA ;
Kornguth, PJ ;
Soo, MS ;
Walsh, R ;
Mengoni, P .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1999, 172 (06) :1621-1625
[4]   Breast imaging reporting and data system standardized mammography lexicon: Observer variability in lesion description [J].
Baker, JA ;
Kornguth, PJ ;
Floyd, CE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1996, 166 (04) :773-778
[5]  
Ball CG, 2002, CAN J SURG, V45, P259
[6]   BIRADS™ classification in mammography [J].
Balleyguier, Corinne ;
Ayadi, Salma ;
Nguyen, Kim Van ;
Vanel, Daniel ;
Dromain, Clarisse ;
Sigal, Robert .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2007, 61 (02) :192-194
[7]   Breast imaging reporting and data system: Inter- and intraobserver variability in feature analysis and final assessment [J].
Berg, WA ;
Campassi, C ;
Langenberg, P ;
Sexton, MJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2000, 174 (06) :1769-1777
[8]  
Berube M, 1998, CAN ASSOC RADIOL J, V49, P223
[9]  
CHEREL P, 2005, REF GYNECOL OBSTET, V11, P76
[10]   Accuracy and underestimation of malignancy of breast core needle biopsy: The florence experience of over 4000 consecutive biopsies [J].
Ciatto, Stefano ;
Houssami, Nehmat ;
Ambrogetti, Daniela ;
Bianchi, Simonetta ;
Bonardi, Rita ;
Brancato, Beniamino ;
Catarzi, Sandra ;
Risso, Gabriella G. .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2007, 101 (03) :291-297