SMART CITY: Definition and hvaluation of Key Performance Indicators

被引:0
作者
Picioroaga, Irina-Ioana [1 ]
Eremia, Mircea [1 ]
Sanduleac, Mihai [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Politehn Bucuresti, Dept Elect Power Syst, Bucharest, Romania
来源
2018 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE AND EXPOSITION ON ELECTRICAL AND POWER ENGINEERING (EPE) | 2018年
关键词
Analytic Hierarchy Process; energy and environment indicators; evaluation model; Smart City; sustainability;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Accelerated evolution of technology and rising level of globalization have encouraged the emergence of a new concept of urban communities. Smart City model can efficiently incorporate the most recent scientific solutions in daily activities of cities, and improve living quality by integrating social resources, infrastructure modernization and economic growth. Although this novel concept is gaining more and more attention, a smart city assessment system is rarely applied in order to evaluate urban development situation, leading to unjustified decision making and unnecessary investments. In this regard, the formulation of a relevant set of key indicators is mandatory for measuring performance of cities development. The goal of the paper is to provide a comprehensive evaluation model fi- this system of indicators, focusing on energy and environment concerns as study subjects. With the assistance of computer programs, the z-transformation and Analytic Hierarchy Process methods are implemented for the evaluation algorithm construction. The presented model seeks to investigate the development profiles of various cities around the world, but also to carry out comparisons between performances of the selected cities.
引用
收藏
页码:217 / 222
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Impact of smart logistics on smart city sustainable performance: an empirical investigation [J].
Shee, Himanshu Kumar ;
Miah, Shah J. ;
De Vass, Tharaka .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LOGISTICS MANAGEMENT, 2021, 32 (03) :821-845
[42]   Modelling the Smart Governance Performance to Support Smart City Program in Indonesia [J].
Herdiyanti, Anisah ;
Hapsari, Palupi Sekar ;
Susanto, Tony Dwi .
FIFTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE, 2019, 161 :367-377
[43]   EVALUATION FRAMEWORK FOR KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS OF RAILWAY ITS [J].
Mlinaric, Tomislav Josip ;
Dordevic, Boban ;
Krmac, Evelin .
PROMET-TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION, 2018, 30 (04) :491-500
[44]   Rating ESG key performance indicators in the airline industry [J].
Llanos, Alan Francisco Caraveo Gomez ;
Vijaya, Annas ;
Wicaksono, Hendro .
ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 26 (11) :27629-27653
[45]   A SMART CITY ASSESSMENT FRAMEWORK: THE CASE OF ISTANBUL'S SMART CITY PROJECT [J].
Canitez, Fatih ;
Deveci, Muhammet .
ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT (ESD 2018): 32ND INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE ON ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT, 2018, :369-380
[46]   Bibliometric review of actuators: Key automation technology in a smart city framework [J].
Rani, Sita ;
Kumar, Raman .
MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS, 2022, 60 :1800-1807
[47]   How are smart city policies progressing in Italy? Insights from SDG indicators [J].
Barbieri, Roberta ;
Coluccia, Benedetta ;
Natale, Francesco .
LAND USE POLICY, 2025, 148
[48]   Qualitative indicators for smart city business models: The case of mobile services and applications [J].
Walravens, Nils .
TELECOMMUNICATIONS POLICY, 2015, 39 (3-4) :218-240
[49]   Modeling and Key Technologies of a Data-Driven Smart City System [J].
Fang, Yufei ;
Shan, Zhiguang ;
Wang, Wei .
IEEE ACCESS, 2021, 9 :91244-91258
[50]   Smart City and Energy: A Bibliometric Review of the Smart City and Smart Energy Concept from the Perspective of the Bioclimatic Approach [J].
Boulanger, Saveria Olga Murielle .
ENERGIES, 2024, 17 (11)