Technical Note: Defining cyclotron-based clinical scanning proton machines in a FLUKA Monte Carlo system

被引:9
|
作者
Fiorini, Francesca [1 ]
Schreuder, Niek [2 ]
Van den Heuvel, Frank [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, MRC Oxford Inst Radiat Oncol, CRUK, Oxford, England
[2] Provis Proton Therapy Ctr, Knoxville, TN USA
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
cyclotron accelerated beams; FLUKA simulations; Monte Carlo treatment verification; proton therapy; RayStation TPS; treatment planning; TREATMENT PLANNING SYSTEM; RANGE UNCERTAINTIES; HIGH-ENERGY; THERAPY; SIMULATIONS; ACCURACY; BEAM;
D O I
10.1002/mp.12701
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: Cyclotron-based pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton machines represent nowadays the majority and most affordable choice for proton therapy facilities, however, their representation in Monte Carlo (MC) codes is more complex than passively scattered proton system-or synchrotron-based PBS machines. This is because degraders are used to decrease the energy from the cyclotron maximum energy to the desired energy, resulting in a unique spot size, divergence, and energy spread depending on the amount of degradation. This manuscript outlines a generalized methodology to characterize a cyclotron-based PBS machine in a general-purpose MC code. The code can then be used to generate clinically relevant plans starting from commercial TPS plans. Methods: The described beam is produced at the Provision Proton Therapy Center (Knoxville, TN, USA) using a cyclotron-based IBA Proteus Plus equipment. We characterized the Provision beam in the MC FLUKA using the experimental commissioning data. The code was then validated using experimental data in water phantoms for single pencil beams and larger irregular fields. Comparisons with RayStation TPS plans are also presented. Results: Comparisons of experimental, simulated, and planned dose depositions in water plans show that same doses are calculated by both programs inside the target areas, while penumbrae differences are found at the field edges. These differences are lower for the MC, with a c(3%-3 mm) index never below 95%. Conclusions: Extensive explanations on how MC codes can be adapted to simulate cyclotron-based scanning proton machines are given with the aim of using the MC as a TPS verification tool to check and improve clinical plans. For all the tested cases, we showed that dose differences with experimental data are lower for the MC than TPS, implying that the created FLUKA beam model is better able to describe the experimental beam. (C) 2017 The Authors. Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:963 / 970
页数:8
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [31] An algorithm to assess the need for clinical Monte Carlo dose calculation for small proton therapy fields based on quantification of tissue heterogeneity
    Bueno, M.
    Paganetti, H.
    Duch, M. A.
    Schuemann, J.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 40 (08)
  • [32] Technical note: Delivery benefit and dosimetric implication of synchrotron-based proton pencil beam scanning using continuous scanning mode
    Liang, Xiaoying
    Beltran, Chris J.
    Liu, Chunbo
    Shen, Jiajian
    Li, Heng
    Furutani, Keith M.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2023, 50 (08) : 5252 - 5261
  • [33] Commissioning of a synchrotron-based proton beam therapy system for use with a Monte Carlo treatment planning system
    Azcona, Juan-Diego
    Aguilar, Borja
    Perales, Alvaro
    Polo, Ramon
    Zucca, Daniel
    Irazola, Leticia
    Vinals, Alberto
    Cabello, Pablo
    Delgado, Jose-Miguel
    Pedrero, Diego
    Bermudez, Rocio
    Fayos-Sola, Roser
    Huesa-Berral, Carlos
    Burguete, Javier
    RADIATION PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY, 2023, 204
  • [34] GATE as a GEANT4-based Monte Carlo platform for the evaluation of proton pencil beam scanning treatment plans
    Grevillot, L.
    Bertrand, D.
    Dessy, F.
    Freud, N.
    Sarrut, D.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2012, 57 (13) : 4223 - 4244
  • [35] A GPU-Accelerated and Monte Carlo-Based Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy Optimization System
    Ma, J.
    Tseung, H. Wan Chan
    Beltran, C.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (06) : 535 - 536
  • [36] Validation of a GPU-based Monte Carlo code (gPMC) for proton radiation therapy: clinical cases study
    Giantsoudi, Drosoula
    Schuemann, Jan
    Jia, Xun
    Dowdell, Stephen
    Jiang, Steve
    Paganetti, Harald
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2015, 60 (06) : 2257 - 2269
  • [37] A Monte-Carlo-based study of a single-2D-detector proton-radiography system
    Olivari, Francesco
    Van Goethem, Marc-Jan
    Brandenburg, Sytze
    Van der Graaf, Emiel R.
    PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2023, 112
  • [38] Monte Carlo simulation-based patient-specific QA using machine log files for line-scanning proton radiation therapy
    Jeon, Chanil
    Lee, Jinhyeop
    Shin, Jungwook
    Cheon, Wonjoong
    Ahn, Sunghwan
    Jo, Kwanghyun
    Han, Youngyih
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2023, 50 (11) : 7139 - 7153
  • [39] Technical Note: Investigating interplay effects in pencil beam scanning proton therapy with a 4D XCAT phantom within the RayStation treatment planning system
    den Boer, Erik
    Wulff, Joerg
    Maeder, UIf
    Engwall, Erik
    Baeumer, Christian
    Perko, Zoltan
    Timmermann, Beate
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 48 (03) : 1448 - 1455
  • [40] A Monte Carlo-based analytic model of neutron dose equivalent for a mevion gantry-mounted passively scattered proton system for craniospinal irradiation
    Baradaran-Ghahfarokhi, Milad
    Reynoso, Francisco
    Sun, Baozhou
    Darafsheh, Arash
    Prusator, Michael T.
    Mutic, Sasa
    Zhao, Tianyu
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 47 (09) : 4509 - 4521