Technical Note: Defining cyclotron-based clinical scanning proton machines in a FLUKA Monte Carlo system

被引:9
|
作者
Fiorini, Francesca [1 ]
Schreuder, Niek [2 ]
Van den Heuvel, Frank [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, MRC Oxford Inst Radiat Oncol, CRUK, Oxford, England
[2] Provis Proton Therapy Ctr, Knoxville, TN USA
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
cyclotron accelerated beams; FLUKA simulations; Monte Carlo treatment verification; proton therapy; RayStation TPS; treatment planning; TREATMENT PLANNING SYSTEM; RANGE UNCERTAINTIES; HIGH-ENERGY; THERAPY; SIMULATIONS; ACCURACY; BEAM;
D O I
10.1002/mp.12701
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: Cyclotron-based pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton machines represent nowadays the majority and most affordable choice for proton therapy facilities, however, their representation in Monte Carlo (MC) codes is more complex than passively scattered proton system-or synchrotron-based PBS machines. This is because degraders are used to decrease the energy from the cyclotron maximum energy to the desired energy, resulting in a unique spot size, divergence, and energy spread depending on the amount of degradation. This manuscript outlines a generalized methodology to characterize a cyclotron-based PBS machine in a general-purpose MC code. The code can then be used to generate clinically relevant plans starting from commercial TPS plans. Methods: The described beam is produced at the Provision Proton Therapy Center (Knoxville, TN, USA) using a cyclotron-based IBA Proteus Plus equipment. We characterized the Provision beam in the MC FLUKA using the experimental commissioning data. The code was then validated using experimental data in water phantoms for single pencil beams and larger irregular fields. Comparisons with RayStation TPS plans are also presented. Results: Comparisons of experimental, simulated, and planned dose depositions in water plans show that same doses are calculated by both programs inside the target areas, while penumbrae differences are found at the field edges. These differences are lower for the MC, with a c(3%-3 mm) index never below 95%. Conclusions: Extensive explanations on how MC codes can be adapted to simulate cyclotron-based scanning proton machines are given with the aim of using the MC as a TPS verification tool to check and improve clinical plans. For all the tested cases, we showed that dose differences with experimental data are lower for the MC than TPS, implying that the created FLUKA beam model is better able to describe the experimental beam. (C) 2017 The Authors. Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:963 / 970
页数:8
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [21] Monte Carlo framework for commissioning a synchrotron-based discrete spot scanning proton beam system and treatment plan verification
    Moskvin, Vadim P.
    Faught, Austin
    Pirlepesov, Fakhriddin
    Zhao, Li
    Hua, Chia-Ho
    Merchant, Thomas E.
    BIOMEDICAL PHYSICS & ENGINEERING EXPRESS, 2021, 7 (04)
  • [22] A multi-source based Monte Carlo simulation model for spot scanning proton radiotherapy using GEANT4
    Galanakou, Panagiota
    String, Shawn
    Shang, Charles
    Tahir, Sajjad
    Aydogan, Bulent
    Muhammad, Wazir
    RADIATION PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY, 2023, 208
  • [23] A new emittance selection system to maximize beam transmission for low-energy beams in cyclotron-based proton therapy facilities with gantry
    Maradia, Vivek
    Meer, David
    Weber, Damien Charles
    Lomax, Antony John
    Schippers, Jacobus Maarten
    Psoroulas, Serena
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 48 (12) : 7613 - 7622
  • [24] Clinical implementation of a GPU-based simplified Monte Carlo method for a treatment planning system of proton beam therapy
    Kohno, R.
    Hotta, K.
    Nishioka, S.
    Matsubara, K.
    Tansho, R.
    Suzuki, T.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2011, 56 (22) : N287 - N294
  • [25] Technical note: Providing proton fields down to the few-MeV level at clinical pencil beam scanning facilities for radiobiological experiments
    Behrends, Carina
    Baeumer, Christian
    Verbeek, Nico
    Ehlert, Jens
    Prasad, Rajendra
    Wulff, Joerg
    Luehr, Armin
    Timmermann, Beate
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 49 (01) : 666 - 674
  • [26] Validation and application of a fast Monte Carlo algorithm for assessing the clinical impact of approximations in analytical dose calculations for pencil beam scanning proton therapy
    Huang, Sheng
    Souris, Kevin
    Li, Siyang
    Kang, Minglei
    Montero, Ana Maria Barragan
    Janssens, Guillaume
    Lin, Alexander
    Garver, Elizabeth
    Ainsley, Christopher
    Taylor, Paige
    Xiao, Ying
    Lin, Liyong
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 45 (12) : 5631 - 5642
  • [27] A Monte-Carlo-based and GPU-accelerated 4D-dose calculator for a pencil beam scanning proton therapy system
    Pepin, Mark D.
    Tryggestad, Erik
    Tseung, Hok Seum Wan Chan
    Johnson, Jedediah E.
    Herman, Michael G.
    Beltran, Chris
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 45 (11) : 5293 - 5304
  • [28] Evaluation of monte carlo to support commissioning of the treatment planning system of new pencil beam scanning proton therapy facilities
    Botnariuc, D.
    Court, S.
    Lourenco, A.
    Gosling, A.
    Royle, G.
    Hussein, M.
    Rompokos, V
    Veiga, C.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2024, 69 (04)
  • [29] Clinical implementation of a Monte Carlo based independent TPS dose checking system
    A. G. Livingstone
    S. B. Crowe
    S. Sylvander
    T. Kairn
    Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine, 2020, 43 : 1113 - 1123
  • [30] Monte Carlo-based parametrization of the lateral dose spread for clinical treatment planning of scanned proton and carbon ion beams
    Parodi, Katia
    Mairani, Andrea
    Sommerer, Florian
    JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH, 2013, 54 : 91 - 96