Technical Note: Defining cyclotron-based clinical scanning proton machines in a FLUKA Monte Carlo system

被引:9
|
作者
Fiorini, Francesca [1 ]
Schreuder, Niek [2 ]
Van den Heuvel, Frank [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, MRC Oxford Inst Radiat Oncol, CRUK, Oxford, England
[2] Provis Proton Therapy Ctr, Knoxville, TN USA
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
cyclotron accelerated beams; FLUKA simulations; Monte Carlo treatment verification; proton therapy; RayStation TPS; treatment planning; TREATMENT PLANNING SYSTEM; RANGE UNCERTAINTIES; HIGH-ENERGY; THERAPY; SIMULATIONS; ACCURACY; BEAM;
D O I
10.1002/mp.12701
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: Cyclotron-based pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton machines represent nowadays the majority and most affordable choice for proton therapy facilities, however, their representation in Monte Carlo (MC) codes is more complex than passively scattered proton system-or synchrotron-based PBS machines. This is because degraders are used to decrease the energy from the cyclotron maximum energy to the desired energy, resulting in a unique spot size, divergence, and energy spread depending on the amount of degradation. This manuscript outlines a generalized methodology to characterize a cyclotron-based PBS machine in a general-purpose MC code. The code can then be used to generate clinically relevant plans starting from commercial TPS plans. Methods: The described beam is produced at the Provision Proton Therapy Center (Knoxville, TN, USA) using a cyclotron-based IBA Proteus Plus equipment. We characterized the Provision beam in the MC FLUKA using the experimental commissioning data. The code was then validated using experimental data in water phantoms for single pencil beams and larger irregular fields. Comparisons with RayStation TPS plans are also presented. Results: Comparisons of experimental, simulated, and planned dose depositions in water plans show that same doses are calculated by both programs inside the target areas, while penumbrae differences are found at the field edges. These differences are lower for the MC, with a c(3%-3 mm) index never below 95%. Conclusions: Extensive explanations on how MC codes can be adapted to simulate cyclotron-based scanning proton machines are given with the aim of using the MC as a TPS verification tool to check and improve clinical plans. For all the tested cases, we showed that dose differences with experimental data are lower for the MC than TPS, implying that the created FLUKA beam model is better able to describe the experimental beam. (C) 2017 The Authors. Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:963 / 970
页数:8
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] Investigation of combined degrader for proton facility based on BDSIM/FLUKA Monte Carlo methods
    Han, Man-Fen
    Zheng, Jin-Xing
    Zeng, Xian-Hu
    Shen, Jun-Song
    NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND TECHNIQUES, 2022, 33 (02)
  • [2] Technical Note: An approach to building a Monte Carlo simulation model for a double scattering proton beam system
    Yuan, Jiankui
    Ellis, Rodney
    Machtay, Mitchell
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 45 (06) : 2660 - 2666
  • [3] Investigation of combined degrader for proton facility based on BDSIM/FLUKA Monte Carlo methods
    Man-Fen Han
    Jin-Xing Zheng
    Xian-Hu Zeng
    Jun-Song Shen
    Nuclear Science and Techniques, 2022, 33
  • [4] Characterizing a proton beam scanning system for Monte Carlo dose calculation in patients
    Grassberger, C.
    Lomax, Anthony
    Paganetti, H.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2015, 60 (02) : 633 - 645
  • [5] Clinical CT-based calculations of dose and positron emitter distributions in proton therapy using the FLUKA Monte Carlo code
    Parodi, K.
    Ferrari, A.
    Sommerer, F.
    Paganetti, H.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2007, 52 (12) : 3369 - 3387
  • [6] Clinical validation of a GPU-based Monte Carlo dose engine of a commercial treatment planning system for pencil beam scanning proton therapy
    Fracchiolla, Francesco
    Engwall, Erik
    Janson, Martin
    Tamm, Fredrik
    Lorentini, Stefano
    Fellin, Francesco
    Bertolini, Mattia
    Algranati, Carlo
    Righetto, Roberto
    Farace, Paolo
    Amichetti, Maurizio
    Schwarz, Marco
    PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 88 : 226 - 234
  • [7] TOPAS Monte Carlo simulation for a scanning proton therapy system in SPHIC
    Chen, Zhi
    Liu, Hongdong
    Zhao, Jingfang
    Kaess, Stefanie
    JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH AND APPLIED SCIENCES, 2022, 15 (01) : 122 - 129
  • [8] Optimization of GATE and PHITS Monte Carlo code parameters for uniform scanning proton beam based on simulation with FLUKA general-purpose code
    Kurosu, Keita
    Takashina, Masaaki
    Koizumi, Masahiko
    Das, Indra J.
    Moskvin, Vadim P.
    NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION B-BEAM INTERACTIONS WITH MATERIALS AND ATOMS, 2014, 336 : 45 - 54
  • [9] A benchmarking method to evaluate the accuracy of a commercial proton monte carlo pencil beam scanning treatment planning system
    Lin, Liyong
    Huang, Sheng
    Kang, Minglei
    Hiltunen, Petri
    Vanderstraeten, Reynald
    Lindberg, Jari
    Siljamaki, Sami
    Wareing, Todd
    Davis, Ian
    Barnett, Allen
    McGhee, John
    Simone, Charles B., II
    Solberg, Timothy D.
    McDonough, James E.
    Ainsley, Christopher
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 18 (02): : 44 - 49
  • [10] Technical Note: Monte Carlo methods to comprehensively evaluate the robustness of 4D treatments in proton therapy
    Souris, Kevin
    Montero, Ana Barragan
    Janssens, Guillaume
    Di Perri, Dario
    Sterpin, Edmond
    Lee, John A.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 46 (10) : 4676 - 4684