Relationship between in vitro fertilisation of ewe oocytes and the fertility of ewes following cervical artificial insemination with frozen-thawed ram semen

被引:40
作者
O'Meara, CM
Hanrahan, JP
Donovan, A
Fair, S
Rizos, D
Wade, M
Boland, MP
Evans, ACO
Lonergan, P
机构
[1] Univ Coll Dublin, Conway Inst Biomed Res, Ctr Integrat Biol, Dept Anim Sci, Newcastle, County Dublin, Ireland
[2] TEAGASC, Res Ctr, Athenry, County Galway, Ireland
关键词
ram; fertility; IVF; frozen-thawed semen; cleavage rate; blastocyst rate;
D O I
10.1016/j.theriogenology.2005.04.009
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
No laboratory test exists that can reliably predict differences among rams in field fertility after artificial insemination (AI) with frozen-thawed semen. In vitro fertilisation (IVF) has been proposed as a method of predicting these differences. The objectives of this study were to evaluate whether IVF system could discriminate among rams of different fertility in vivo after AI using frozen-thawed semen. Also, to examine effects of lowering sperm concentration on discrimination power between rams used for IVF. The aim of Experiment 1 was to evaluate the effect of altering the sperm concentration from 2 x 10(6) to 0.03125 x 10(6) spermatozoa/mL on subsequent cleavage rate and blastocyst rate in vitro. In Experiment 2, six rains (three High and three Low in vivo fertility; average pregnancy rates of 37.6% and 21.8%, respectively) were compared for their fertilising ability in IVF. Spermatozoa from each of the six rams were added to ewe oocytes using a concentration of either 2 x 10(6) or 0.0625 x 10(6)/mL. There were six replicates with 25 oocytes per well and two wells per ram per replicate. Cleavage rate was monitored at 48 It post-insemination (p.i.) and blastocyst rate determined on Days 6-8 p.i. In Experiment 1, cleavage rate increased with increasing sperm concentration and blastocyst rate was not affected by sperm concentration on any day. When the six rams were tested using 2 x 106 spermatozoa/mL, no significant differences were found between High and Low fertility groups for cleavage rate or blastocyst rate on Days 6, 7, or 8 p.i. (P > 0.05). When the experiment was repeated using 0.0625 x 106 spermatozoa/mL, no differences were found between High and Low group rams for blastocyst rate on any of Days 6, 7 or 8 p.i. (P > 0.05). However, there was a significant difference between High and Low fertility rams for percentage of oocytes cleaved (16.4, S.E. 2.02%; P < 0.01) and the correlation between fertility in vivo and cleavage rate in vitro was significant (P = 0.013). Replicate of IVF was a source of significant variation for both cleavage rate and blastocyst rate and conditions need to be further controlled. However, we suggest that using a low concentration of spermatozoa (0.0625 x 10(6)/mL) for IVF may be a useful method for predicting field fertility of frozen-thawed ram semen. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1797 / 1808
页数:12
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Culture of preimplantation embryos: Facts and artifacts [J].
Bavister, BD .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION UPDATE, 1995, 1 (02) :91-148
[2]  
BAVISTER BD, 1990, SERONO S, P77
[3]   Effect of freezing rate of ram spermatozoa on subsequent fertility in vivo and in vitro [J].
Byrne, GP ;
Lonergan, P ;
Wade, M ;
Duffy, P ;
Donovan, A ;
Hanrahan, JP ;
Boland, MP .
ANIMAL REPRODUCTION SCIENCE, 2000, 62 (04) :265-275
[4]   FERTILITY IN THE EWE AFTER ARTIFICIAL-INSEMINATION WITH FRESH AND FROZEN-SEMEN AT THE INDUCED ESTRUS, AND INFLUENCE OF THE PHOTOPERIOD ON THE SEMEN QUALITY OF THE RAM [J].
COLAS, G .
LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION SCIENCE, 1979, 6 (02) :153-166
[5]  
CURNOCK RM, 1984, ANIM PROD, V38, P546
[6]  
EDWARD JL, 1992, P AUST SOC REPROD BI, V24, P19
[7]   APPLICATION OF REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGY TO THE AUSTRALIAN LIVESTOCK INDUSTRIES [J].
EVANS, G .
REPRODUCTION FERTILITY AND DEVELOPMENT, 1991, 3 (06) :627-650
[8]  
EVANS G, 1988, CONTROLLED BREEDING, V1, P103
[9]  
EYESTONE W H, 1989, Theriogenology, V31, P191, DOI 10.1016/0093-691X(89)90599-2
[10]  
FUKUI Y, 1988, J REPROD FERTIL, V82, P337, DOI 10.1530/jrf.0.0820337