From maternity paper hand-held records to electronic health records: what do women tell us about their use?

被引:5
作者
Hawley, Glenda [1 ]
Hepworth, Julie [2 ]
Wilkinson, Shelley A. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Jackson, Claire [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Royal Brisbane & Womens Hosp, Ctr Res Excellence Primary Hlth Care Microsyst, Sch Med,Discipline Gen Practice,APHCRI, Level 8 Hlth Sci Bldg,Bldg 16-910, Herston, Qld 4029, Australia
[2] Queensland Univ Technol, Sch Publ Hlth & Social Work, Victoria Pk Rd, Kelvin Grove, Qld 4059, Australia
[3] Mater Hlth Serv, Mater Res Mothers & Babies Theme, Raymond Terrace, South Brisbane, Qld 4101, Australia
[4] Mater Hlth Serv, Dept Nutr & Dietet, Raymond Terrace, South Brisbane, Qld 4101, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
antenatal; general practitioner (GP); Mater Shared Electronic Health Record (MSEHR); maternity; qualitative research; shared care; CARE; ACCESS;
D O I
10.1071/PY14170
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
The paper hand-held record (PHR) has been used extensively in general practice (GP) shared care management of pregnant women, and recently, the first Mater Shared Electronic Health Record (MSEHR) was introduced. The aim of this qualitative study was to examine women's experiences using the records and the contribution of the records to integrate care. At the 36-week antenatal visit in a maternity tertiary centre clinic, women were identified as a user of either the PHR or the MSEHR and organised into Phase 1 and Phase 2 studies respectively. Fifteen women were interviewed in Phase 1 and 12 women in Phase 2. Semi-structured interviews were used for data collection, and analysed using qualitative content analysis. Four main themes were identified: (1) purpose of the record, (2) perceptions of the record; (3) content of the record, and (4) sharing the record. Findings indicate that the PHR is a well-liked maternity tool. The findings also indicate there is under-usage of the MSEHR due to health-care providers failing to follow up and discuss the option of using the electronic health record option or if a woman has completed the log-in process. This paper adds to an already favourable body of knowledge about the use of the PHR. It is recommended that continued implementation of the MSEHR be undertaken to facilitate its use.
引用
收藏
页码:339 / 348
页数:10
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2002, Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods
  • [2] Using an electronic medical record to improve communication within a prenatal care network
    Bernstein, PS
    Farinelli, C
    Merkatz, IR
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 105 (03) : 607 - 612
  • [3] SHOULD WOMEN CARRY THEIR ANTENATAL RECORDS
    DRAPER, J
    FIELD, S
    THOMAS, H
    HARE, MJ
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1986, 292 (6520) : 603 - 603
  • [4] Eggleton M, 2014, AUSTR FINANCIAL REV, P33
  • [5] THE NEWBURY MATERNITY CARE STUDY - A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL TO ASSESS A POLICY OF WOMEN HOLDING THEIR OWN OBSTETRIC RECORDS
    ELBOURNE, D
    RICHARDSON, M
    CHALMERS, I
    WATERHOUSE, I
    HOLT, E
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1987, 94 (07): : 612 - 619
  • [6] How patients use access to their full health records: a qualitative study of patients in general practice
    Fisher, Brian
    Bhavnani, Vanita
    Winfield, Marlene
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE, 2009, 102 (12) : 538 - 544
  • [7] How to read a paper - Papers that go beyond numbers (qualitative research)
    Greenhalgh, T
    Taylor, R
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1997, 315 (7110): : 740 - 743
  • [8] HAMILTON S G, 1956, Practitioner, V176, P79
  • [9] In a maternity shared-care environment, what do we know about the paper hand-held and electronic health record: a systematic literature review
    Hawley, Glenda
    Janamian, Tina
    Jackson, Claire
    Wilkinson, Shelley A.
    [J]. BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2014, 14
  • [10] Hoerbst A, 2010, METHOD INFORM MED, V49, P230