The role of contingency factors on the relationship between sustainability practices and organizational performance

被引:80
作者
Maletic, Matja [1 ]
Maletic, Damjan [1 ]
Gomiscek, Boftjan [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maribor, Fac Org Sci, Maribor, Slovenia
[2] Univ Wollongong Dubai, Fac Business, Dubai, U Arab Emirates
关键词
Sustainability practices; Contingency factors; Exploitation; Exploration; Organizational performance; CORPORATE SUSTAINABILITY; FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE; QUALITY MANAGEMENT; CONTEXTUAL FACTORS; MODERATING ROLE; INNOVATION; EXPLOITATION; EXPLORATION; MODEL; FIRMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.172
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study intends to clarify the understanding of the role of the contingency factors (i.e. long-term orientation, competitiveness and uncertainty) in the relation between sustainability practices (sustain ability exploitation and sustainability exploration) and organizational performance. Using empirical data based on a large-scale survey among European organizations, this paper utilizes the regression analysis to gain insight into the relationship between sustainability practices and organizational performance. In general, the results support the contingency view of the relationship between sustainability practices and performance rather than relying upon "universal" view of sustainability practices. Particularly, the results show that in moderate environmental contexts (moderate competitiveness and uncertainty) sustainability exploitation practices seem to be a predominant predictor of organizational performance. Further, it appears that sustainability exploration practices are the most important predictor of innovation performance, especially when organizations are faced with high levels of competitiveness, uncertainty and long-term orientation. In contrast, sustainability exploitation practices seem to dominate in explaining the effects on quality performance. In this regard, we can argue that organizations with similar characteristics (capabilities, performance, and activity) may develop different and customised approaches for managing the interface between business and natural environment. (C) 2017 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:423 / 433
页数:11
相关论文
共 77 条
[51]  
Parnell JA., 2000, Management Decision, V38, P520, DOI DOI 10.1108/00251740010352811
[52]   Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies [J].
Podsakoff, PM ;
MacKenzie, SB ;
Lee, JY ;
Podsakoff, NP .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 88 (05) :879-903
[53]  
Porter M. E., 1980, Competitive strategy
[54]   The strategic fit between innovation strategies and business environment in delivering business performance [J].
Prajogo, Daniel I. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2016, 171 :241-249
[55]   The relationship between multidimensional organizational culture and performance [J].
Prajogo, Daniel I. ;
McDermott, Christopher M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS & PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT, 2011, 31 (7-8) :712-735
[56]  
Pryshlakivsky J., 2015, J BUS ETHICS
[57]   Going one's own way: drivers in developing business models for sustainability [J].
Rauter, Romana ;
Jonker, Jan ;
Baumgartner, Rupert J. .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 140 :144-154
[58]   Integrating sustainable development into existing management systems [J].
Rocha, Miguel ;
Searcy, Cory ;
Karapetrovic, Stanislav .
TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT & BUSINESS EXCELLENCE, 2007, 18 (1-2) :83-92
[59]   Business models for sustainable innovation - an empirical analysis of frugal products and services [J].
Rosca, Eugenia ;
Arnold, Marlen ;
Bendul, Julia C. .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 162 :S133-S145
[60]   Constituents of radical innovation-exploring the role of strategic orientations and market uncertainty [J].
Sainio, Liisa-Maija ;
Ritala, Paavo ;
Hurmelinna-Laukkanen, Pia .
TECHNOVATION, 2012, 32 (11) :591-599