Wireless ambulatory pH studies: manometric or endoscopic guidance?

被引:6
|
作者
Nusrat, S. [1 ]
Roy, P. M. [1 ]
Bielefeldt, K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Med Ctr, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
关键词
diagnostic study; esophageal manometry; gastroesophageal reflux; health-care cost; GASTROESOPHAGEAL-REFLUX DISEASE; ESOPHAGEAL ACID EXPOSURE; MONITORING INCREASES SENSITIVITY; UNINVESTIGATED DYSPEPSIA; GENERAL-POPULATION; BARRETTS-ESOPHAGUS; CAPSULE PLACEMENT; BRAVO WIRELESS; SYMPTOMS; PREVALENCE;
D O I
10.1111/j.1442-2050.2011.01218.x
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Wireless pH studies are widely used to assess the presence and severity of gastroesophageal reflux disease. We hypothesized that sedation or air insufflation during a preceding endoscopy may systematically alter results. A retrospective review of ambulatory pH studies completed between January 2008 and April 2010 was performed. The pH capsule was placed 6 cm above the endoscopically determined location of the squamocolumnar junction or 5 cm above the manometrically localized upper border of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES). A total of 356 patients (65% women) underwent pH studies using the BRAVO system (GIVEN Imaging, Yoqneam, Israel). In 186 patients (E-P), the capsule was placed during endoscopy. In 170 patients (M-P), capsule placement was based on manometric determination of LES boundaries using pharyngeal anesthesia only. Endoscopic placement was successful in all cases, whereas two patients could not tolerate capsule insertion with topical anesthesia only. The mean recording time did not differ between the two groups (E-P: 2468 +/- 38 min; M-P: 2415 +/- 40 min). The number of patients with abnormal findings on day 1 but normal results for day 2 was similar with 15% for E-P compared with 11% for M-P. However, there was a significant difference in total acid exposure times between days 1 and 2 for endoscopically (day 1: 7.3 +/- 1.2; day 2: 4.8 +/- 0.5; P < 0.01), but not manometrically based placement (day 1: 7.7 +/- 0.7; day 2: 7.2 +/- 0.6). There was no difference in the number of symptoms between days or groups (E-P day 1:13.4 +/- 1.3; E-P day 2: 16.0 +/- 1.6; M-P day 1: 14.1 +/- 2.1; M-P day 2: 15.7 +/- 2.0). Similarly, the symptom sensitivity index did not differ significantly between days and groups (E-P: day 1: 4.1 +/- 0.5; day 2: 5.9 +/- 0.8; M-P: day 5.3 +/- 0.8; day 2: 5.7 +/- 0.8). The majority of patients tolerate insertion of a wireless pH monitoring capsule without sedation. Unsedated placement did not negatively affect total recording times. Although endoscopy resulted in higher acid exposure on day one it did not significantly increase the overall fraction of abnormal tests. If confirmed in prospective studies, the more consistent findings and a potential to lower cost favor manometrically guided capsule placement.
引用
收藏
页码:26 / 32
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Role of diaphragmatic crura and lower esophageal sphincter in gastroesophageal reflux disease - Manometric and pH-Metric study of small hiatal hernia
    Cuomo, R
    Grasso, R
    Sarnelli, G
    Bruzzese, D
    Bottiglieri, ME
    Alfieri, M
    Sifrim, D
    Budillon, G
    DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 2001, 46 (12) : 2687 - 2694
  • [42] Role of Diaphragmatic Crura and Lower Esophageal Sphincter in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: Manometric and pH-Metric Study of Small Hiatal Hernia
    Rosario Cuomo
    Raffaella Grasso
    Giovanni Sarnelli
    Dario Bruzzese
    Maria Ermina Bottiglieri
    Maria Alfieri
    Daniel Sifrim
    Gabriele Budillon
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 2001, 46 : 2687 - 2694
  • [43] Identification of Sleep Bruxism with an Ambulatory Wireless Recording System
    Inano, Shinji
    Mizumori, Takahiro
    Kobayashi, Yasuyoshi
    Sumiya, Masakazu
    Yatani, Hirofumi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS, 2013, 26 (06) : 527 - 535
  • [44] Helicobacter pylori and gastroesophageal reflux disease -: Lack of influence of infection on twenty-four-hour esophageal pH monitoring and endoscopic findings
    Gisbert, JP
    de Pedro, A
    Losa, C
    Barreiro, A
    Pajares, JM
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2001, 32 (03) : 210 - 214
  • [45] Clinical Utility of the Wireless pH Capsule
    Lacy, Brian E.
    Dukowicz, Andrew C.
    Robertson, Douglas J.
    Weiss, Julia E.
    Teixeira, Pedro
    Kelley, Maurice L., Jr.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2011, 45 (05) : 429 - 435
  • [46] Extended Wireless pH Monitoring Significantly Increases Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Diagnoses in Patients With a Normal pH Impedance Study
    Zeki, Sebastian S.
    Miah, Ismail
    Visaggi, Pierfrancesco
    Wolak, Anna
    deSilva, Minerva
    Dunn, Jason M.
    Davies, Andrew
    Gossage, James
    Botha, Abrie
    Sui, Guiping
    Jafari, Jafar
    Wong, Terry
    JOURNAL OF NEUROGASTROENTEROLOGY AND MOTILITY, 2023, 29 (03) : 335 - 342
  • [47] Prolonged, wireless pH-studies have a high diagnostic yield in patients with reflux symptoms and negative 24-h catheter-based pH-studies
    Sweis, R.
    Fox, M.
    Anggiansah, A.
    Wong, T.
    NEUROGASTROENTEROLOGY AND MOTILITY, 2011, 23 (05) : 419 - 426
  • [48] Unsedated peroral wireless pH capsule placement vs. standard pH testing: A randomized study and cost analysis
    Andrews, Christopher N.
    Sadowski, Daniel C.
    Lazarescu, Adriana
    Williams, Chad
    Neshev, Emil
    Storr, Martin
    Au, Flora
    Heitman, Steven J.
    BMC GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2012, 12
  • [49] Dual Ambulatory pH Monitoring in Patients with Gastroesophageal Reflux Rendered Asymptomatic with Proton Pump Inhibitor Therapy
    Lin, David
    Triadafilopoulos, George
    DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 2015, 60 (05) : 1343 - 1349
  • [50] Manometry and 24-hour ambulatory pH monitoring at two levels of the esophagus in patients with and without esophagitis
    Mantilla, CS
    de Leon, AR
    de la Serna, JP
    Taxonera, C
    Paredes, JG
    Rubio, MD
    REVISTA ESPANOLA DE ENFERMEDADES DIGESTIVAS, 1998, 90 (03) : 150 - 154