Wireless ambulatory pH studies: manometric or endoscopic guidance?

被引:6
|
作者
Nusrat, S. [1 ]
Roy, P. M. [1 ]
Bielefeldt, K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Med Ctr, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
关键词
diagnostic study; esophageal manometry; gastroesophageal reflux; health-care cost; GASTROESOPHAGEAL-REFLUX DISEASE; ESOPHAGEAL ACID EXPOSURE; MONITORING INCREASES SENSITIVITY; UNINVESTIGATED DYSPEPSIA; GENERAL-POPULATION; BARRETTS-ESOPHAGUS; CAPSULE PLACEMENT; BRAVO WIRELESS; SYMPTOMS; PREVALENCE;
D O I
10.1111/j.1442-2050.2011.01218.x
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Wireless pH studies are widely used to assess the presence and severity of gastroesophageal reflux disease. We hypothesized that sedation or air insufflation during a preceding endoscopy may systematically alter results. A retrospective review of ambulatory pH studies completed between January 2008 and April 2010 was performed. The pH capsule was placed 6 cm above the endoscopically determined location of the squamocolumnar junction or 5 cm above the manometrically localized upper border of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES). A total of 356 patients (65% women) underwent pH studies using the BRAVO system (GIVEN Imaging, Yoqneam, Israel). In 186 patients (E-P), the capsule was placed during endoscopy. In 170 patients (M-P), capsule placement was based on manometric determination of LES boundaries using pharyngeal anesthesia only. Endoscopic placement was successful in all cases, whereas two patients could not tolerate capsule insertion with topical anesthesia only. The mean recording time did not differ between the two groups (E-P: 2468 +/- 38 min; M-P: 2415 +/- 40 min). The number of patients with abnormal findings on day 1 but normal results for day 2 was similar with 15% for E-P compared with 11% for M-P. However, there was a significant difference in total acid exposure times between days 1 and 2 for endoscopically (day 1: 7.3 +/- 1.2; day 2: 4.8 +/- 0.5; P < 0.01), but not manometrically based placement (day 1: 7.7 +/- 0.7; day 2: 7.2 +/- 0.6). There was no difference in the number of symptoms between days or groups (E-P day 1:13.4 +/- 1.3; E-P day 2: 16.0 +/- 1.6; M-P day 1: 14.1 +/- 2.1; M-P day 2: 15.7 +/- 2.0). Similarly, the symptom sensitivity index did not differ significantly between days and groups (E-P: day 1: 4.1 +/- 0.5; day 2: 5.9 +/- 0.8; M-P: day 5.3 +/- 0.8; day 2: 5.7 +/- 0.8). The majority of patients tolerate insertion of a wireless pH monitoring capsule without sedation. Unsedated placement did not negatively affect total recording times. Although endoscopy resulted in higher acid exposure on day one it did not significantly increase the overall fraction of abnormal tests. If confirmed in prospective studies, the more consistent findings and a potential to lower cost favor manometrically guided capsule placement.
引用
收藏
页码:26 / 32
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [32] Endoscopic diagnosis of hiatus hernia under deep inspiration is not consistent with esophageal manometric diagnosis
    Hanada, Yuriko
    Hoshino, Shintaro
    Hoshikawa, Yoshimasa
    Takenouchi, Nana
    Umezawa, Mariko
    Kawami, Noriyuki
    Iwakiri, Katsuhiko
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2018, 53 (06) : 712 - 717
  • [33] VALIDITY OF AMBULATORY 24-H ESOPHAGEAL PH MEASUREMENT IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF REFLUX DISEASE
    HIETANEN, E
    RAITAKARI, OT
    BACKMAN, H
    CLINICAL PHYSIOLOGY, 1995, 15 (05): : 491 - 498
  • [34] The significance of pH and manometric testing after laparoscopic fundoplication - Are postoperative physiologic tests necessary?
    Arca, MJ
    Gagner, M
    Garcia-Ruiz, A
    Heniford, BT
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2002, 16 (03): : 395 - 400
  • [35] VARIATIONS IN RESULTS OF SIMULTANEOUS AMBULATORY ESOPHAGEAL PH MONITORING
    HAMPTON, FJ
    MACFADYEN, UM
    MAYBERRY, JF
    DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 1992, 37 (04) : 506 - 512
  • [36] Reproducibility of ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring in the aperistaltic esophagus
    Shoenut, JP
    Micflikier, AB
    Aldor, TAM
    Yaffe, CS
    Goldenberg, DJ
    DYSPHAGIA, 1996, 11 (04) : 248 - 251
  • [37] AMBULATORY ESOPHAGEAL PH MONITORING IN GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX DISEASE
    RICHTER, JE
    SINGH, S
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1992, 6 (03): : 155 - 164
  • [38] WIRELESS PH MONITORING AND CONVENTIONAL ESOPHAGEAL PH MONITORING: COMPARATIVE STUDY OF DISCOMFORT, LIMITATIONS IN DAILY ACTIVITIES AND COMPLICATIONS
    Azzam, Rimon Sobhi
    Azzam, Gabriela Barge
    Nasi, Ary
    ABCD-ARQUIVOS BRASILEIROS DE CIRURGIA DIGESTIVA-BRAZILIAN ARCHIVES OF DIGESTIVE SURGERY, 2021, 34 (01):
  • [39] Ambulatory long-term pH monitoring in pigs
    K. A. Gawad
    R. Wachowiak
    C. Rempf
    W. J. Tiefenbacher
    T. Strate
    E. G. Achilles
    C. Blöchle
    J. R. Izbicki
    Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques, 2003, 17 : 1556 - 1560
  • [40] MANOMETRIC CHANGES INDUCED BY ANTIREFLUX SURGERY (NISSEN) AND THEIR RELATION TO PH-METRIC AND CLINICAL FINDINGS - ANALYSIS AT 6 MONTHS POST SURGERY
    GOMEZ, R
    SEOANE, J
    MORENO, D
    CUENCA, B
    HIDALGO, M
    GARCIA, A
    PALOMO, JC
    MARCELLO, M
    MORENO, E
    REVISTA ESPANOLA DE ENFERMEDADES DIGESTIVAS, 1992, 82 (01) : 1 - 6