Wireless ambulatory pH studies: manometric or endoscopic guidance?

被引:6
|
作者
Nusrat, S. [1 ]
Roy, P. M. [1 ]
Bielefeldt, K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Med Ctr, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
关键词
diagnostic study; esophageal manometry; gastroesophageal reflux; health-care cost; GASTROESOPHAGEAL-REFLUX DISEASE; ESOPHAGEAL ACID EXPOSURE; MONITORING INCREASES SENSITIVITY; UNINVESTIGATED DYSPEPSIA; GENERAL-POPULATION; BARRETTS-ESOPHAGUS; CAPSULE PLACEMENT; BRAVO WIRELESS; SYMPTOMS; PREVALENCE;
D O I
10.1111/j.1442-2050.2011.01218.x
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Wireless pH studies are widely used to assess the presence and severity of gastroesophageal reflux disease. We hypothesized that sedation or air insufflation during a preceding endoscopy may systematically alter results. A retrospective review of ambulatory pH studies completed between January 2008 and April 2010 was performed. The pH capsule was placed 6 cm above the endoscopically determined location of the squamocolumnar junction or 5 cm above the manometrically localized upper border of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES). A total of 356 patients (65% women) underwent pH studies using the BRAVO system (GIVEN Imaging, Yoqneam, Israel). In 186 patients (E-P), the capsule was placed during endoscopy. In 170 patients (M-P), capsule placement was based on manometric determination of LES boundaries using pharyngeal anesthesia only. Endoscopic placement was successful in all cases, whereas two patients could not tolerate capsule insertion with topical anesthesia only. The mean recording time did not differ between the two groups (E-P: 2468 +/- 38 min; M-P: 2415 +/- 40 min). The number of patients with abnormal findings on day 1 but normal results for day 2 was similar with 15% for E-P compared with 11% for M-P. However, there was a significant difference in total acid exposure times between days 1 and 2 for endoscopically (day 1: 7.3 +/- 1.2; day 2: 4.8 +/- 0.5; P < 0.01), but not manometrically based placement (day 1: 7.7 +/- 0.7; day 2: 7.2 +/- 0.6). There was no difference in the number of symptoms between days or groups (E-P day 1:13.4 +/- 1.3; E-P day 2: 16.0 +/- 1.6; M-P day 1: 14.1 +/- 2.1; M-P day 2: 15.7 +/- 2.0). Similarly, the symptom sensitivity index did not differ significantly between days and groups (E-P: day 1: 4.1 +/- 0.5; day 2: 5.9 +/- 0.8; M-P: day 5.3 +/- 0.8; day 2: 5.7 +/- 0.8). The majority of patients tolerate insertion of a wireless pH monitoring capsule without sedation. Unsedated placement did not negatively affect total recording times. Although endoscopy resulted in higher acid exposure on day one it did not significantly increase the overall fraction of abnormal tests. If confirmed in prospective studies, the more consistent findings and a potential to lower cost favor manometrically guided capsule placement.
引用
收藏
页码:26 / 32
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Assessment of esophageal involvement in systemic sclerosis and morphea (localized scleroderma) by clinical, endoscopic, manometric and pH metric features: a prospective comparative hospital based study
    Tasleem Arif
    Qazi Masood
    Jaswinder Singh
    Iffat Hassan
    BMC Gastroenterology, 15
  • [22] Esophageal function in achalasia: Preoperative and postoperative manometric studies
    Tovar, JA
    Prieto, G
    Molina, M
    Arana, J
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 1998, 33 (06) : 834 - 838
  • [23] Sedation and Afternoon Placement of the 48-Hour Wireless Ambulatory pH Capsule Results in More Reflux on the First Day
    Patel, Rupal
    Chae, Soojong
    Kumar, Ambuj
    Richter, Joel E.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2017, 51 (07) : 594 - 598
  • [24] Evolution of gastroesophageal reflux after laparoscopic vertical gastrectomy. A radiographic, manometric and pH-metric study
    Ruiz de Angulo, Davis
    Jimeno Grino, Pila
    Ortiz Escandell, Maria Angeles
    Munitiz Ruiz, Vicente
    Gil Vazquez, Pedro Jose
    Perez Flores, Domingo
    Martinez de Haro, Luisa Fernanda
    Miguel Hernandez, Antonio
    Parrilla Paricio, Pascual
    REVISTA ESPANOLA DE ENFERMEDADES DIGESTIVAS, 2019, 111 (09) : 662 - 666
  • [25] Comparison of wireless 48-h (Bravo) versus traditional ambulatory 24-h esophageal pH monitoring
    Hakanson, Bengt S.
    Berggren, Per
    Granqvist, Staffan
    Ljungqvist, Olle
    Thorell, Anders
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2009, 44 (03) : 276 - 283
  • [26] Eosinophinc Esophagitis and Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: An Overlapping of Clinical, Endoscopic and Manometric Features
    Karapiperis, Dimitrios
    Malmstrom, Carina
    Vrakas, Spyridon
    Gil, Jonatan
    Ignatova, Simone
    Elmahdy, Sara
    Franzen, Thomas
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 13 (06)
  • [27] Esophageal motor dysfunction persists in children after surgical cure of reflux: An ambulatory manometric study
    Godoy, J
    Tovar, JA
    Vicente, Y
    Olivares, P
    Molina, M
    Prieto, G
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 2001, 36 (09) : 1405 - 1411
  • [28] Ambulatory 24-Hour Pharyngeal pH Monitoring in Healthy Korean Volunteers
    Moon, Won
    Park, Moo In
    Park, Seun Ja
    Kim, Kyu Jong
    Lee, Kang Dae
    DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 2009, 54 (12) : 2598 - 2605
  • [29] Practical approach to interpretation of 48-hour wireless pH-monitoring studies
    Kamboj, Amrit K.
    Chan, Yin
    Nasser, Jason
    Lim, Jane E.
    Chang, Bianca W.
    Rezaie, Ali
    GUT, 2024, 73 (09) : 1595 - 1595
  • [30] Normal values of 24-hour ambulatory esophageal impedance-pH monitoring in a rural South African cohort of healthy participants
    Ndebia, E. J.
    Sammon, A. M.
    Umapathy, E.
    Iputo, J. E.
    DISEASES OF THE ESOPHAGUS, 2016, 29 (04) : 385 - 391