Wireless ambulatory pH studies: manometric or endoscopic guidance?

被引:6
|
作者
Nusrat, S. [1 ]
Roy, P. M. [1 ]
Bielefeldt, K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Med Ctr, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
关键词
diagnostic study; esophageal manometry; gastroesophageal reflux; health-care cost; GASTROESOPHAGEAL-REFLUX DISEASE; ESOPHAGEAL ACID EXPOSURE; MONITORING INCREASES SENSITIVITY; UNINVESTIGATED DYSPEPSIA; GENERAL-POPULATION; BARRETTS-ESOPHAGUS; CAPSULE PLACEMENT; BRAVO WIRELESS; SYMPTOMS; PREVALENCE;
D O I
10.1111/j.1442-2050.2011.01218.x
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Wireless pH studies are widely used to assess the presence and severity of gastroesophageal reflux disease. We hypothesized that sedation or air insufflation during a preceding endoscopy may systematically alter results. A retrospective review of ambulatory pH studies completed between January 2008 and April 2010 was performed. The pH capsule was placed 6 cm above the endoscopically determined location of the squamocolumnar junction or 5 cm above the manometrically localized upper border of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES). A total of 356 patients (65% women) underwent pH studies using the BRAVO system (GIVEN Imaging, Yoqneam, Israel). In 186 patients (E-P), the capsule was placed during endoscopy. In 170 patients (M-P), capsule placement was based on manometric determination of LES boundaries using pharyngeal anesthesia only. Endoscopic placement was successful in all cases, whereas two patients could not tolerate capsule insertion with topical anesthesia only. The mean recording time did not differ between the two groups (E-P: 2468 +/- 38 min; M-P: 2415 +/- 40 min). The number of patients with abnormal findings on day 1 but normal results for day 2 was similar with 15% for E-P compared with 11% for M-P. However, there was a significant difference in total acid exposure times between days 1 and 2 for endoscopically (day 1: 7.3 +/- 1.2; day 2: 4.8 +/- 0.5; P < 0.01), but not manometrically based placement (day 1: 7.7 +/- 0.7; day 2: 7.2 +/- 0.6). There was no difference in the number of symptoms between days or groups (E-P day 1:13.4 +/- 1.3; E-P day 2: 16.0 +/- 1.6; M-P day 1: 14.1 +/- 2.1; M-P day 2: 15.7 +/- 2.0). Similarly, the symptom sensitivity index did not differ significantly between days and groups (E-P: day 1: 4.1 +/- 0.5; day 2: 5.9 +/- 0.8; M-P: day 5.3 +/- 0.8; day 2: 5.7 +/- 0.8). The majority of patients tolerate insertion of a wireless pH monitoring capsule without sedation. Unsedated placement did not negatively affect total recording times. Although endoscopy resulted in higher acid exposure on day one it did not significantly increase the overall fraction of abnormal tests. If confirmed in prospective studies, the more consistent findings and a potential to lower cost favor manometrically guided capsule placement.
引用
收藏
页码:26 / 32
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Sleeve gastrectomy and gastroesophageal reflux: a comprehensive endoscopic and pH-manometric prospective study
    Castagneto-Gissey, Lidia
    Genco, Alfredo
    Del Corpo, Giulia
    Badiali, Danilo
    Pronio, Anna Maria
    Casella, Giovanni
    SURGERY FOR OBESITY AND RELATED DISEASES, 2020, 16 (11) : 1629 - 1637
  • [2] Assessment of esophageal involvement in systemic sclerosis and morphea (localized scleroderma) by clinical, endoscopic, manometric and pH metric features: a prospective comparative hospital based study
    Arif, Tasleem
    Masood, Qazi
    Singh, Jaswinder
    Hassan, Iffat
    BMC GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2015, 15
  • [3] Measurement of gastric pH in ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring
    Ayazi, Shahin
    Leers, Jessica M.
    Oezcelik, Arzu
    Abate, Emmanuele
    Peyre, Christian G.
    Hagen, Jeffrey A.
    DeMeester, Steven R.
    Banki, Farzaneh
    Lipham, John C.
    DeMeester, Tom R.
    Crookes, Peter F.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2009, 23 (09): : 1968 - 1973
  • [4] Metabolic syndrome is associated with gastroesophageal reflux disease based on a 24-hour ambulatory pH monitoring
    Kallel, L.
    Bibani, N.
    Fekih, M.
    Matri, S.
    Karoui, S.
    Mustapha, N. B.
    Serghini, M.
    Zouiten, L.
    Feki, M.
    Zouari, B.
    Boubaker, J.
    Kaabachi, N.
    Filali, A.
    DISEASES OF THE ESOPHAGUS, 2011, 24 (03) : 153 - 159
  • [5] AMBULATORY 24-HOUR MANOMETRIC AND PH METRIC EVIDENCE OF PERMANENT IMPAIRMENT OF CLEARANCE CAPACITY IN PATIENTS WITH ESOPHAGEAL ATRESIA
    TOVAR, JA
    PARDO, JAD
    MURCIA, J
    PRIETO, G
    MOLINA, M
    POLANCO, I
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 1995, 30 (08) : 1224 - 1231
  • [6] Ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring by using a wireless system: A pilot study in Taiwan
    Tu, CH
    Lee, YC
    Wang, HP
    Wu, MS
    Chiu, HM
    Lin, JT
    HEPATO-GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2004, 51 (60) : 1586 - 1589
  • [7] Wireless pH capsule - yield in clinical practice
    Roman, S.
    Mion, F.
    Zerbib, F.
    Benamouzig, R.
    Letard, J. C.
    des Varannes, S. Bruley
    ENDOSCOPY, 2012, 44 (03) : 270 - 276
  • [8] Nonerosive gastroesophageal reflux disease and mild degree of esophagitis: Comparison of symptoms endoscopic, manometric and pH-metric patterns
    Grande, Michele
    Sileri, Pierpaolo
    Attina, Grazia Maria
    De Luca, Elisabetta
    Ciano, Paolo
    Ciangola, Carolina Ilaria
    Cadeddu, Federica
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 10
  • [9] Nonerosive gastroesophageal reflux disease and mild degree of esophagitis: Comparison of symptoms endoscopic, manometric and pH-metric patterns
    Michele Grande
    Pierpaolo Sileri
    Grazia Maria Attinà
    Elisabetta De Luca
    Paolo Ciano
    Carolina Ilaria Ciangola
    Federica Cadeddu
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology, 10
  • [10] BRAVO wireless 48 hour pH-metric system
    Hess, Tomas
    Hahn, Eckhart G.
    Konturek, Peter C.
    MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR, 2009, 15 (01): : RA17 - RA21