Shared responsibility: the who, what and how

被引:33
作者
Lukasiewicz, Anna [1 ,2 ]
Dovers, Stephen [2 ,3 ]
Eburn, Michael [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Australian Natl Univ, Coll Law, Canberra, ACT, Australia
[2] Bushfire & Nat Hazards Cooperat Res Ctr, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Australian Natl Univ, Fenner Sch Environm & Soc, Canberra, ACT, Australia
来源
ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS | 2017年 / 16卷 / 04期
关键词
Shared responsibility; disaster resilience; community; policy instruments; empowerment; Australia; COMMUNITY RESILIENCE; MANAGEMENT; RISK; PARTICIPATION; DISASTERS; BUSHFIRE; LESSONS; POLICY; FIRE;
D O I
10.1080/17477891.2017.1298510
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
As natural disasters increase around the world and stretch the capacities of emergency services, national governments and international institutions have stressed the importance of shared responsibility; the idea that all actors within a society have some obligations in disaster management and must work collectively to reduce disaster risk. However, the exact balance between individual and government responsibility is not yet established and continually contested, especially after major events. In Australia, the National Strategy for Disaster Resilience (NSDR) is the overarching policy framework for disaster risk management and aims to create resilient communities through an emphasis on shared responsibility and empowerment. Through a literature review and document analysis of the NSDR and associated policy documents, we clarify, organise and operationalise the necessarily general policy goal of shared responsibility. We first analyse how the NSDR conceptualises communities to discover which community actors are mentioned. We then identify the responsibilities it prescribes or implies for these different actors and consider the types of policy instruments that are relevant to disaster risk management. Our analysis reveals a tension between the NSDR's placement of government at the centre of disaster risk management, and its other, less well-explained emphasis on community empowerment.
引用
收藏
页码:291 / 313
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   The who, what, and how of teamwork research in medical operating rooms: A scoping review [J].
Raveendran, Lucshman ;
McGuire, Cailie S. ;
Gazmin, Stefanie ;
Beiko, Darren ;
Martin, Luc J. .
JOURNAL OF INTERPROFESSIONAL CARE, 2023, 37 (03) :504-514
[42]   Expansion of Chinese Social Health Insurance: who gets what, when and how? [J].
Huang, Xian .
JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY CHINA, 2014, 23 (89) :923-951
[43]   Review of Appetite for Risk-What it is, Who has it and How I survived [J].
Srinivasan, Rajashree .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2024, 17 (03) :324-325
[44]   WHO'S TO BLAME WHEN A BUSINESS FAILS? How JOURNALISTIC DEATH METAPHORS INFLUENCE RESPONSIBILITY ATTRIBUTIONS [J].
Williams, Ann E. ;
Davidson, Roei ;
Yochim, Emily Chivers .
JOURNALISM & MASS COMMUNICATION QUARTERLY, 2011, 88 (03) :541-561
[45]   What in the World Is Collective Responsibility? [J].
Giubilini, Alberto ;
Levy, Neil .
DIALECTICA, 2018, 72 (02) :191-217
[46]   What is it to Share Contraceptive Responsibility? [J].
Emmalon Davis .
Topoi, 2017, 36 :489-499
[47]   What is it to Share Contraceptive Responsibility? [J].
Davis, Emmalon .
TOPOI-AN INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF PHILOSOPHY, 2017, 36 (03) :489-499
[48]   Negotiating the transition between different teaching contexts through shared responsibility and shared reflection [J].
Beers, Jennifer S. .
CULTURAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2009, 4 (02) :443-447
[49]   Glocal corporate social responsibility and co-creation of shared values in the mining industry [J].
Leitao, Joao ;
Rodrigues, Margarida ;
Manuel Rodriguez-Carrasco, Jose .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT, 2021, 16 (03) :384-407
[50]   Shared responsibility and community engagement: Community narratives of bushfire risk information in Victoria, Australia [J].
Cooper, Vanessa ;
Fairbrother, Peter ;
Elliott, Glenn ;
Walker, Matthew ;
Ch'ng, Huck-Ying .
JOURNAL OF RURAL STUDIES, 2020, 80 :259-272