Shared responsibility: the who, what and how

被引:33
作者
Lukasiewicz, Anna [1 ,2 ]
Dovers, Stephen [2 ,3 ]
Eburn, Michael [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Australian Natl Univ, Coll Law, Canberra, ACT, Australia
[2] Bushfire & Nat Hazards Cooperat Res Ctr, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Australian Natl Univ, Fenner Sch Environm & Soc, Canberra, ACT, Australia
来源
ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS | 2017年 / 16卷 / 04期
关键词
Shared responsibility; disaster resilience; community; policy instruments; empowerment; Australia; COMMUNITY RESILIENCE; MANAGEMENT; RISK; PARTICIPATION; DISASTERS; BUSHFIRE; LESSONS; POLICY; FIRE;
D O I
10.1080/17477891.2017.1298510
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
As natural disasters increase around the world and stretch the capacities of emergency services, national governments and international institutions have stressed the importance of shared responsibility; the idea that all actors within a society have some obligations in disaster management and must work collectively to reduce disaster risk. However, the exact balance between individual and government responsibility is not yet established and continually contested, especially after major events. In Australia, the National Strategy for Disaster Resilience (NSDR) is the overarching policy framework for disaster risk management and aims to create resilient communities through an emphasis on shared responsibility and empowerment. Through a literature review and document analysis of the NSDR and associated policy documents, we clarify, organise and operationalise the necessarily general policy goal of shared responsibility. We first analyse how the NSDR conceptualises communities to discover which community actors are mentioned. We then identify the responsibilities it prescribes or implies for these different actors and consider the types of policy instruments that are relevant to disaster risk management. Our analysis reveals a tension between the NSDR's placement of government at the centre of disaster risk management, and its other, less well-explained emphasis on community empowerment.
引用
收藏
页码:291 / 313
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Serrated lesions: who, what, when, where, why, and how? [J].
Lui, Rashid N. ;
Sung, Joseph J. Y. .
JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2020, 35 (11) :1851-1852
[22]   Relational business model for shared responsibility [J].
Wieland, Josef ;
Schwengber, Jessica Geraldo .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ETHICS AND SYSTEMS, 2024, :569-589
[23]   Distance-based shared responsibility [J].
Temursho, Umed ;
Miller, Ronald E. .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 257
[24]   How to design personalization in a context of customer retention: Who personalizes what and to what extent? [J].
Kwon, Kwiseok ;
Kim, Cookhwan .
ELECTRONIC COMMERCE RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS, 2012, 11 (02) :101-116
[25]   Armed Opposition Groups and Shared Responsibility [J].
Bilkova, Veronika .
NETHERLANDS INTERNATIONAL LAW REVIEW, 2015, 62 (01) :69-89
[26]   Shared responsibility for the education of pharmacy students [J].
Turner, Christopher .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACY, 2018, 75 (04) :223-229
[27]   Physician Depression and Suicide: A Shared Responsibility [J].
Eckleberry-Hunt, Jodie ;
Lick, David .
TEACHING AND LEARNING IN MEDICINE, 2015, 27 (03) :341-345
[28]   How Adolescents Develop Responsibility: What Can Be Learned From Youth Programs [J].
Salusky, Ida ;
Larson, Reed W. ;
Griffith, Aisha ;
Wu, Joanna ;
Raffaelli, Marcela ;
Sugimura, Niwako ;
Guzman, Maria .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH ON ADOLESCENCE, 2014, 24 (03) :417-430
[29]   Who Holds a Shared Responsibility View of Minimizing Gambling Harm? Results From a Multiwave Survey of Casino Gamblers [J].
Gray, Heather M. ;
Louderback, Eric R. ;
LaPlante, Debi A. ;
Abarbanel, Brett ;
Kraus, Shane W. ;
Bernhard, Bo J. .
PSYCHOLOGY OF ADDICTIVE BEHAVIORS, 2022, 36 (04) :347-357
[30]   Who, what, where, when, and how: IPOS legacy and future directions [J].
Goldzweig, Gil ;
Andersen, Barbara L. .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOCIAL ONCOLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2024, 6 (04)