Shared responsibility: the who, what and how

被引:33
|
作者
Lukasiewicz, Anna [1 ,2 ]
Dovers, Stephen [2 ,3 ]
Eburn, Michael [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Australian Natl Univ, Coll Law, Canberra, ACT, Australia
[2] Bushfire & Nat Hazards Cooperat Res Ctr, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Australian Natl Univ, Fenner Sch Environm & Soc, Canberra, ACT, Australia
来源
ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS | 2017年 / 16卷 / 04期
关键词
Shared responsibility; disaster resilience; community; policy instruments; empowerment; Australia; COMMUNITY RESILIENCE; MANAGEMENT; RISK; PARTICIPATION; DISASTERS; BUSHFIRE; LESSONS; POLICY; FIRE;
D O I
10.1080/17477891.2017.1298510
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
As natural disasters increase around the world and stretch the capacities of emergency services, national governments and international institutions have stressed the importance of shared responsibility; the idea that all actors within a society have some obligations in disaster management and must work collectively to reduce disaster risk. However, the exact balance between individual and government responsibility is not yet established and continually contested, especially after major events. In Australia, the National Strategy for Disaster Resilience (NSDR) is the overarching policy framework for disaster risk management and aims to create resilient communities through an emphasis on shared responsibility and empowerment. Through a literature review and document analysis of the NSDR and associated policy documents, we clarify, organise and operationalise the necessarily general policy goal of shared responsibility. We first analyse how the NSDR conceptualises communities to discover which community actors are mentioned. We then identify the responsibilities it prescribes or implies for these different actors and consider the types of policy instruments that are relevant to disaster risk management. Our analysis reveals a tension between the NSDR's placement of government at the centre of disaster risk management, and its other, less well-explained emphasis on community empowerment.
引用
收藏
页码:291 / 313
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Enacting shared responsibility in biosecurity governance: insights from adaptive governance
    Rawluk, Andrea
    Beilin, Ruth
    Lavau, Stephanie
    ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2021, 26 (02):
  • [2] Deconstructing the concept of shared responsibility for disaster resilience: a Sunshine Coast case study, Australia
    Singh-Peterson, Lila
    Salmon, Paul
    Baldwin, Claudia
    Goode, Natassia
    NATURAL HAZARDS, 2015, 79 (02) : 755 - 774
  • [3] Who or what is to blame? The role of attribution of responsibility in layoffs
    Lilly, Juliana
    Wipawayangkool, Kamphol
    Virick, Meghna
    Roman, Ronald
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ETHICS AND SYSTEMS, 2024, 40 (03) : 613 - 627
  • [4] Biosecurity in multifunctional landscapes: challenges for approaches based on the concept of 'shared responsibility'
    Sinclair, Katrina
    Curtis, Allan
    Freeman, Paul
    PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE, 2020, 178
  • [5] Preparing students for the professional workplace: who has responsibility for what?
    Bates, Annerley
    Bates, Merrelyn
    Bates, Lyndel
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF COOPERATIVE EDUCATION, 2007, 8 (02): : 121 - 129
  • [6] Shared Epistemic Responsibility
    Millar, Boyd
    EPISTEME-A JOURNAL OF INDIVIDUAL AND SOCIAL EPISTEMOLOGY, 2021, 18 (04): : 493 - 506
  • [7] Strategic planning for degrowth: What, who, how
    Savini, Federico
    PLANNING THEORY, 2025, 24 (02) : 141 - 162
  • [8] Deconstructing the concept of shared responsibility for disaster resilience: a Sunshine Coast case study, Australia
    Lila Singh-Peterson
    Paul Salmon
    Claudia Baldwin
    Natassia Goode
    Natural Hazards, 2015, 79 : 755 - 774
  • [9] Shared responsibility and social vulnerability in the 2011 Brisbane flood
    Box, Pamela
    Bird, Deanne
    Haynes, Katharine
    King, David
    NATURAL HAZARDS, 2016, 81 (03) : 1549 - 1568
  • [10] Shared Responsibility and Issues of Injustice and Harm within Sport
    Sartore-Baldwin, Melanie L.
    McCullough, Brian
    Quatman-Yates, Catherine
    QUEST, 2017, 69 (03) : 366 - 383