Peer-led focus groups as 'dialogic spaces' for exploring young people's evolving values

被引:12
作者
Djohari, Natalie [1 ]
Higham, Rupert [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ East Anglia, Sch Int Dev, Norwich Res Pk, Norwich NR4 7TJ, Norfolk, England
[2] UCL Inst Educ, London Ctr Leadership Learning, London, England
关键词
Peer-led; focus groups; dialogue; moral values; power; CHILDREN; COMMUNITY;
D O I
10.1080/0305764X.2020.1754763
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Although peer-led focus groups are widely used in research with children and young people, surprisingly little has been written that evaluates their methodological appropriateness. Drawing on data from 10 peer-led focus group sessions across 5 international schools, this article demonstrates how focus group discussions around moral and social values, which become more meaningful though the self-reflection provoked in encounters with different experiences and perspectives, can be advantageous for research. Peer-moderators, as both participants and facilitators, run focus groups that open dialogic spaces for exploratory talk that avoids the self-censure and deference that can emerge in the presence of an adult moderator. This is particularly important when participants are structurally disadvantaged and lack similar spaces for collaborative inquiry into their shared experiences. Video capture allows researchers in-depth access to these focus groups after the event, revealing evidentially and pedagogically rich dialogues.
引用
收藏
页码:657 / 672
页数:16
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Understanding the Role of Technology in Adolescent Dating and Dating Violence [J].
Baker, Charlene K. ;
Carreo, Patricia K. .
JOURNAL OF CHILD AND FAMILY STUDIES, 2016, 25 (01) :308-320
[2]  
Booth T., 2016, The Index for Inclusion: A Guide to School Development Led by Inclusive Values
[3]  
Borda O.Fals., 2001, HDB ACTION RES, P27
[4]   'Creative' visual methods in media research: possibilities, problems and proposals [J].
Buckingham, David .
MEDIA CULTURE & SOCIETY, 2009, 31 (04) :633-+
[5]  
Cook B., 2001, Participation: A new tyranny?
[6]   Aging out: Youths' perspectives on foster care and the transition to independence [J].
Cunningham, Miranda J. ;
Diversi, Marcelo .
QUALITATIVE SOCIAL WORK, 2013, 12 (05) :587-602
[7]  
Darbyshire P., 2005, Qualitative Research, V5, P417, DOI DOI 10.1177/1468794105056921
[8]   The use of Quality Talk to increase critical analytical speaking and writing of students in three secondary schools [J].
Davies, Maree ;
Meissel, Kane .
BRITISH EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2016, 42 (02) :342-365
[9]  
Dewey J, 1966, DEMOCRACY ED
[10]  
Facer K, 2016, Creating living knowledge: The connected communities programme, community-university relationships and the participatory turn in the production of knowledge