ETHICAL CHALLENGES OF QUALITATIVE RESEARCH IN COMMUNITIES: FROM PLANNING TO THE RESEARCH REPORT

被引:2
作者
Biruski, Dinka Corkalo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zagreb, Fac Humanities & Social Sci, Dept Psychol, Zagreb 41000, Croatia
来源
LJETOPIS SOCIJALNOG RADA | 2014年 / 21卷 / 03期
关键词
ethics; qualitative research; informed consent; researcher-participants relationship; positive or active ethics; ISSUES;
D O I
10.3935/ljsr.v21i2.7
中图分类号
C916 [社会工作、社会管理、社会规划];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
The paper critically examines ethical challenges in qualitative research. The major point of departure is the claim that quantitative research is different from qualitative in a methodological sense, but the research ethics is not fundamentally different though there is a difference in intensity, amount and presence of ethical concerns. However, because of this difference the ethical issues in qualitative research are more epistemological in nature and are essentially methodological; hence if left unresolved, they could directly influence the validity and reliability of the research. The paper outlines an ethical map of qualitative research which defines the whole process, starting from preparation of the research, through data collection, with an emphasis on the research-participant relationship, and ending with the reporting of results. We discuss the ethical aspects of all research phases, with special importance being placed on the ethics of building the relationship between the researcher and participants. Specific aspects of inform consent in qualitative research have been analyzed as well as the ethics of reporting the results. Starting from the critical theory point of view, an approach of positive or active ethics has been established, advocating the practice of the highest ethical standards as necessary preconditions for conducting trustworthy qualitative research.
引用
收藏
页码:393 / 423
页数:31
相关论文
共 78 条
[31]  
Fisher P, 2012, ETHICS SOC WELF, V6, P2, DOI 10.1080/17496535.2011.591811
[32]   Ethics in violence against women research: The sensitive, the dangerous, and the overlooked [J].
Fontes, LA .
ETHICS & BEHAVIOR, 2004, 14 (02) :141-174
[33]   Understanding and evaluating qualitative research [J].
Fossey, E ;
Harvey, C ;
McDermott, F ;
Davidson, L .
AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2002, 36 (06) :717-732
[34]  
Freedman SarahWarshauer., 2004, My Neighbor, My Enemy: Justice and Community in the Aftermath of Mass Atrocity, P226
[35]   Ethics in human subjects research: Do incentives matter? [J].
Grant, RW ;
Sugarman, J .
JOURNAL OF MEDICINE AND PHILOSOPHY, 2004, 29 (06) :717-738
[36]  
Guba E.G., 1994, COMPETING PARADIGMS, V1
[37]   Ethics, reflexivity, and "Ethically important moments" in research [J].
Guillemin, M ;
Gillam, L .
QUALITATIVE INQUIRY, 2004, 10 (02) :261-280
[38]  
Haggerty K.D., 2004, QUAL SOCIOL, V27, P391, DOI [DOI 10.1023/B:QUAS.0000049239.15922.A3, 10.1023/B:QUAS.0000049239.15922.a3]
[39]  
Hammersley M., 2007, Ethnography. Principles in Practice, V3rd, DOI DOI 10.4324/9780203944769
[40]   Ethical perspectives on qualitative research in applied psychology [J].
Haverkamp, BE .
JOURNAL OF COUNSELING PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 52 (02) :146-155