The heterogeneous impact of a successful tobacco control campaign: a case study of Mauritius

被引:4
作者
Ross, Hana [1 ,2 ]
Moussa, Leelmanee [3 ]
Harris, Tom [1 ]
Ajodhea, Rajive [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cape Town, Sch Econ, Southern African Labour & Dev Res Unit, Cape Town, South Africa
[2] Emory Univ, Rollins Sch Publ Hlth, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[3] Mauritius Inst Hlth, Pamplemousses, Mauritius
[4] Rushmore Business Sch, Quatre Bornes, Mauritius
关键词
HOUSEHOLD RESOURCE-ALLOCATION; CIGARETTE AFFORDABILITY; EXPENDITURES;
D O I
10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053412
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Mauritius has one of the highest smoking prevalences in Africa, contributing to its high burden of non-communicable diseases. Mauritius implemented a series of tobacco control measures from 2009 to 2012, including tobacco tax increases. There is evidence that these policies reduced tobacco consumption, but it is not clear what impact they had across different socioeconomic groups. Method The impact of tobacco control measures on different income groups was analysed by contrasting household tobacco expenditures reported in 2006-2007 and 2012 household expenditure surveys. We employed the seemingly unrelated regression model to assess the impact of tobacco use on other household expenditures and calculated Gini coefficients to assess tobacco expenditure inequality. Results From 2006 to 2012, excise taxes and retail cigarette prices increased by 40.6% and 15.3% in real terms, respectively. These increases were accompanied by numerous non-price tobacco control measures. The share of tobacco-consuming households declined from 35.7% to 29.3%, with the largest relative drop among low-income households. The Gini coefficient of household tobacco expenditures increased by 10.4% due to decreased spending by low-income households. Low-income households demonstrated the largest fall in their tobacco budget shares, and the impact of tobacco consumption on poverty decreased by 26.2%. Households that continued purchasing tobacco reduced their expenditures on transportation, communication, health, and education. Conclusions These results suggest that tobacco control policies, including sizeable tax increases, were progressive in their impact. We conclude that tobacco use increases poverty and inequality, but stronger tobacco control policies can mitigate the impact of tobacco use on impoverishment.
引用
收藏
页码:83 / 89
页数:7
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [11] ITC Project, 2011, ITC MAUR NAT REP RES
  • [12] ITC Project, 2010, ITC MAUR NAT REP RES
  • [13] Crowding out effect of tobacco expenditure and its implications on household resource allocation in India
    John, Rijo M.
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2008, 66 (06) : 1356 - 1367
  • [14] Tobacco expenditures and its implications for household resource allocation in Cambodia
    John, Rijo M.
    Ross, Hana
    Blecher, Evan
    [J]. TOBACCO CONTROL, 2012, 21 (03) : 341 - 346
  • [15] Counting 15 million more poor in India, thanks to tobacco
    John, Rijo M.
    Sung, Hai-Yen
    Max, Wendy B.
    Ross, Hana
    [J]. TOBACCO CONTROL, 2011, 20 (05) : 349 - 352
  • [16] Ministry of Finance and Economic Development, 2015, POV AAL 2012
  • [17] Ministry of Health and Quality of Life, 2015, TRENDS DIAB CARD DIS
  • [18] Ministry of Health and Quality of Life, 2007, NAT ACT PLAN TOB CON
  • [19] Ministry of Health and Quality of Life, 2014, HLTH STAT ANN
  • [20] The impact of tobacco expenditures on spending within Turkish households
    San, Sayin
    Chaloupka, Frank J.
    [J]. TOBACCO CONTROL, 2016, 25 (05) : 558 - 563