The heterogeneous impact of a successful tobacco control campaign: a case study of Mauritius

被引:4
作者
Ross, Hana [1 ,2 ]
Moussa, Leelmanee [3 ]
Harris, Tom [1 ]
Ajodhea, Rajive [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cape Town, Sch Econ, Southern African Labour & Dev Res Unit, Cape Town, South Africa
[2] Emory Univ, Rollins Sch Publ Hlth, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[3] Mauritius Inst Hlth, Pamplemousses, Mauritius
[4] Rushmore Business Sch, Quatre Bornes, Mauritius
关键词
HOUSEHOLD RESOURCE-ALLOCATION; CIGARETTE AFFORDABILITY; EXPENDITURES;
D O I
10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053412
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Mauritius has one of the highest smoking prevalences in Africa, contributing to its high burden of non-communicable diseases. Mauritius implemented a series of tobacco control measures from 2009 to 2012, including tobacco tax increases. There is evidence that these policies reduced tobacco consumption, but it is not clear what impact they had across different socioeconomic groups. Method The impact of tobacco control measures on different income groups was analysed by contrasting household tobacco expenditures reported in 2006-2007 and 2012 household expenditure surveys. We employed the seemingly unrelated regression model to assess the impact of tobacco use on other household expenditures and calculated Gini coefficients to assess tobacco expenditure inequality. Results From 2006 to 2012, excise taxes and retail cigarette prices increased by 40.6% and 15.3% in real terms, respectively. These increases were accompanied by numerous non-price tobacco control measures. The share of tobacco-consuming households declined from 35.7% to 29.3%, with the largest relative drop among low-income households. The Gini coefficient of household tobacco expenditures increased by 10.4% due to decreased spending by low-income households. Low-income households demonstrated the largest fall in their tobacco budget shares, and the impact of tobacco consumption on poverty decreased by 26.2%. Households that continued purchasing tobacco reduced their expenditures on transportation, communication, health, and education. Conclusions These results suggest that tobacco control policies, including sizeable tax increases, were progressive in their impact. We conclude that tobacco use increases poverty and inequality, but stronger tobacco control policies can mitigate the impact of tobacco use on impoverishment.
引用
收藏
页码:83 / 89
页数:7
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2015, NEP 90 PICT HLTH WAR
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2014, 453 ERSA
  • [3] [Anonymous], ITC MAUR NAT REP RES
  • [4] Effect of cigarette tax increase in combination with mass media campaign on smoking behaviour in Mauritius: findings from the ITC Mauritius Survey
    Azagba, Sunday
    Burhoo, Premduth
    Chaloupka, Frank J.
    Fong, Geoffrey T.
    [J]. TOBACCO CONTROL, 2015, 24 : 71 - 75
  • [5] EQUIVALENCE SCALE RELATIVITIES REVISITED
    BANKS, J
    JOHNSON, P
    [J]. ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 1994, 104 (425) : 883 - 890
  • [6] Cigarette affordability trends: an update and some methodological comments
    Blecher, E. H.
    van Walbeek, C. P.
    [J]. TOBACCO CONTROL, 2009, 18 (03) : 167 - 175
  • [7] An international analysis of cigarette affordability
    Blecher, EH
    van Walbeek, CP
    [J]. TOBACCO CONTROL, 2004, 13 (04) : 339 - 346
  • [8] Burhoo Preduth Deowan, 2011, TOBACCO CONTROL AFRI, P185
  • [9] Garcia LP, 1894, TOBACCO CONTROL POLI
  • [10] International Monetary Fund, 2006, 06224 IMF