MR appearance of uterine dehiscence in the post-cesarean section patient

被引:22
作者
Maldjian, C
Milestone, B
Schnall, M
Smith, R
机构
[1] Temple Univ Hosp & Med Sch, Dept Radiol, Philadelphia, PA 19140 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Dept Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[3] Yale Univ, Med Ctr, New Haven, CT USA
关键词
uterus; surgery; complications; cesarean section; magnetic resonance imaging;
D O I
10.1097/00004728-199809000-00014
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: CT has been shown to be unreliable for detecting uterine dehiscence in the postoperative period after cesarean section (c-section). The purpose of this investigation is to describe the MR appearance of uterine dehiscence in this setting and identify features that distinguish complete from partial dehiscence. Method: Over an 82 month period, all charts and MR reports of patients that underwent MRI of the pelvis after c-section were reviewed for uterine dehisence. Altogether, 55 patients were imaged. Positive cases for dehiscence were retrospectively reviewed by two radiologists. Imaging criteria for complete dehiscence consisted of transmural disruption. Criteria for partial dehiscence consisted of disruption of the endometrial and/or serosal layer, without transmural extension. Results: On MRI, five patients demonstrated abnormalities suggestive of incisional dehiscence. Based on these imaging criteria, two of these showed complete dehiscence that was proven at surgery and three showed findings of partial dehiscence. The optimal imaging plane was perpendicular to the incision. Conclusion: MR features may be utilized to identify total uterine dehiscence and may be more effective than CT.
引用
收藏
页码:738 / 741
页数:4
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]  
BROWN CEL, 1991, SURG GYNECOL OBSTET, V172, P285
[2]  
CUNNINGHAM FG, 1993, WILLIAMS OBSTET, P627
[3]  
DEPALMA RT, 1982, OBSTET GYNECOL, V60, P53
[4]   IDENTIFICATION AND MANAGEMENT OF WOMEN AT HIGH-RISK FOR PELVIC INFECTION FOLLOWING CESAREAN-SECTION [J].
DEPALMA, RT ;
LEVENO, KJ ;
CUNNINGHAM, FG ;
POPE, T ;
KAPPUS, SS ;
ROARK, ML ;
NOBLES, BJ .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1980, 55 (05) :S185-S192
[5]   COMPARISON OF CLINDAMYCIN-GENTAMICIN AND PENICILLIN-GENTAMICIN IN THE TREATMENT OF POST-CESAREAN SECTION ENDOMYOMETRITIS [J].
DIZEREGA, G ;
YONEKURA, L ;
ROY, S ;
NAKAMURA, RM ;
LEDGER, WJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1979, 134 (03) :238-242
[6]   CLINICAL RISK-FACTORS FOR PUERPERAL INFECTION [J].
GIBBS, RS .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1980, 55 (05) :S178-S184
[7]  
GILSTRAP LC, 1979, OBSTET GYNECOL, V53, P545
[8]   GRAVID UTERINE DEHISCENCE - MR FINDINGS [J].
HAMRICKTURNER, JE ;
CRANSTON, PE ;
LANTRIP, BS .
ABDOMINAL IMAGING, 1995, 20 (05) :486-488
[9]   IMAGING OF PREGNANCY-RELATED COMPLICATIONS [J].
ROOHOLAMINI, SA ;
AU, AH ;
HANSEN, GC ;
KIOUMEHR, F ;
DADSETAN, MR ;
CHOW, PP ;
KURZEL, RB ;
MIKHAIL, G .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 1993, 13 (04) :753-770
[10]   ANATOMIC CHANGES IN THE PELVIS ALTER UNCOMPLICATED VAGINAL DELIVERY - EVALUATION WITH SERIAL MR-IMAGING [J].
WILLMS, AB ;
BROWN, ED ;
KETTRITZ, UI ;
KULLER, JA ;
SEMELKA, RC .
RADIOLOGY, 1995, 195 (01) :91-94