Pricing of eco-labels with retailer heterogeneity

被引:113
作者
Asche, Frank [1 ]
Larsen, Thomas A. [2 ]
Smith, Martin D. [3 ]
Sogn-Grundvag, Geir [2 ]
Young, James A. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Stavanger, Dept Ind Econ Risk Management & Planning, N-4036 Stavanger, Norway
[2] Norwegian Inst Food Fisheries & Aquaculture Res, N-9192 Tromso, Norway
[3] Duke Univ, Nicholas Sch Environm, Durham, NC 27706 USA
[4] Univ Stirling, Stirling Management Sch, Mkt & Retail Div, Stirling FK9 4LA, Scotland
关键词
Seafood; Eco-labels; Salmon; WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; ASSESSING CONSUMER PREFERENCES; ECOLABELED SEAFOOD; CHOICE EXPERIMENT; FOOD SAFETY; SALMON; ORIGIN; FISH; CERTIFICATION; INTEGRATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.foodpol.2015.04.004
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
Eco-labels are important features of many natural resource and food markets. They certify that a product has some desirable unobserved quality, typically related to a public good such as being sustainably produced. Two issues that have received limited attention are whether pricing varies across different eco-labels that may compete with each other and to what extent different retailers charge different prices. Using a unique data set of salmon prices in eight different United Kingdom retail chains, we investigate these issues by estimating a price-attribute model that includes two eco-labels and one country-of-origin label. Results show substantial variation in the prices of the different eco-labels and that eco-label premiums vary across retail chains. Specifically, salmon certified with the Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) label has a high premium in low-end retail chains but no statistically significant premium in the high-end chains. These findings question the ability of the MSC label to transmit consumer willingness-to-pay for public goods through the supply chain to incentivize sustainable management. In contrast, premiums for organic certification are similar in magnitude across retailer types. In general, failure to account for retailer heterogeneity will over- or under-estimate a label's premium. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:82 / 93
页数:12
相关论文
共 52 条
[11]   The importance of fishing method, gear and origin: The Spanish hake market [J].
Asche, Frank ;
Guillen, Jordi .
MARINE POLICY, 2012, 36 (02) :365-369
[12]  
Bond CA, 2008, J AGR RESOUR ECON, V33, P402
[13]  
Dauvergne P., 2011, GLOBAL ENV CHANGE
[14]   Do consumers care about ethics? Willingness to pay for fair-trade coffee [J].
De Pelsmacker, P ;
Driesen, L ;
Rayp, G .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS, 2005, 39 (02) :363-385
[15]  
Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations (FAO), 2011, STAT WORLD FISH AQ 2
[16]   Modeling optimal dietary pigmentation strategies in fanned Atlantic salmon: Application of mixed-integer non-linear mathematical programming techniques [J].
Forsberg, Odd Inge ;
Guttormsen, Atle G. .
AQUACULTURE, 2006, 261 (01) :118-124
[17]  
Gudmundsson E., 2000, Marine Resource Economics, V15, P97, DOI DOI 10.1086/MRE.15.2.42629294
[18]   Eco-Label Conveys Reliable Information on Fish Stock Health to Seafood Consumers [J].
Gutierrez, Nicolas L. ;
Valencia, Sarah R. ;
Branch, Trevor A. ;
Agnew, David J. ;
Baum, Julia K. ;
Bianchi, Patricia L. ;
Cornejo-Donoso, Jorge ;
Costello, Christopher ;
Defeo, Omar ;
Essington, Timothy E. ;
Hilborn, Ray ;
Hoggarth, Daniel D. ;
Larsen, Ashley E. ;
Ninnes, Chris ;
Sainsbury, Keith ;
Selden, Rebecca L. ;
Sistla, Seeta ;
Smith, Anthony D. M. ;
Stern-Pirlot, Amanda ;
Teck, Sarah J. ;
Thorson, James T. ;
Williams, Nicholas E. .
PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (08)
[19]   Can household consumers save the wild fish? Lessons from a sustainable seafood advisory [J].
Hallstein, Eric ;
Villas-Boas, Sofia B. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2013, 66 (01) :52-71
[20]  
Holland D., 1998, Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, V27, P1