Impact of FDG-PET/CT fused imaging on tumor volume assessment of head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma: Intermethod and interobserver variations

被引:22
作者
Murakami, R. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Uozumi, H. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Hirai, T. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Nishimura, R. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Katsuragawa, S. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Shiraishi, S. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Toya, R. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Tashiro, K. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Kawanaka, K. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Oya, N. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Tomiguchi, S. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Yamashita, Y. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Kumamoto Univ Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol & Diagnost Radiol, Kumamoto 8608556, Japan
[2] Kumamoto Univ, Sch Hlth Sci, Dept Med Informat Syst, Kumamoto, Japan
[3] Saiseikai Kumamoto Hosp, Dept Radiol, Kumamoto, Japan
[4] Uozumi Clin, Kumamoto, Japan
关键词
gross tumor volume (GTV); interobserver variation; head-and-neck cancer; PET/CT;
D O I
10.1080/02841850802027034
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: Although gross tumor volume (GTV) at the primary site can predict local control of head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) in patients who are treated with organ-preservation therapy, GTV assessment does not eliminate substantial interobserver variation. Purpose: To evaluate whether F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET)/computed tomography (CT) fused imaging provides additional information for GTV assessment. Material and Methods: We obtained FDG-PET/CT fused images on 20 patients with head-and-neck SCC. All had undergone preoperative conventional workup, including contrast-enhanced CT and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The GTV of the primary tumors was designed by two independent observers who used routine clinical data. Observer A was a radiologist and observer B a radiation oncologist. GTV1 and GTV2 were designed without and with FDG-PET/CT, respectively. For geometric interobserver comparison, we calculated the concordance rate as the ratio of the intersection (A boolean AND B) of the GTVs to their union (A boolean OR B). Intermethod (GTV1 vs. GTV2) and interobserver (A vs. B) differences in the GTVs were assessed by Bland-Altman analysis and the Spearman rank-correlation test. The interobserver concordance rates for GTV1 and GTV2 were compared using a two-tailed paired-samples t test. Results: On FDG-PET/CT, all primary tumors were visualized. There was no systemic trend for a volume difference between GTV1 and GTV2. Although the 95% limits of agreement were wider for interobserver than intermethod differences, the 95% limits of interobserver agreement were narrower for GTV2 than GTV1. The mean interobserver concordance rate for GTV2 was higher than for GTV1 (54.5% vs. 39.1%, P = 0.0002). Conclusion: FDG-PET/CT is a useful modality for consistent GTV assessment, which should not be used as a single modality but rather to obtain supplemental information in patients with head-and-neck SCC.
引用
收藏
页码:693 / 699
页数:7
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   The impact of positron emission tomography/computed tomography in edge delineation of gross tumor volume for read and neck cancers [J].
Ashamalla, Hani ;
Guirgius, Adel ;
Bieniek, Ewa ;
Rafla, Sameer ;
Evola, Alex ;
Goswami, Ganesh ;
Oldroyd, Randall ;
Mokhtar, Bahaa ;
Parikh, Kapila .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2007, 68 (02) :388-395
[2]   PET imaging in oncology [J].
Bar-Shalom, R ;
Valdivia, AY ;
Blaufox, MD .
SEMINARS IN NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2000, 30 (03) :150-185
[3]  
Beyer T, 2005, J NUCL MED, V46, P596
[4]   Head and neck malignancy: Is PET/CT more accurate than PET or CT alone? [J].
Branstetter, BF ;
Blodgett, TM ;
Zimmer, LA ;
Snyderman, CH ;
Johnson, JT ;
Raman, S ;
Meltzer, CC .
RADIOLOGY, 2005, 235 (02) :580-586
[5]   Intraobserver and interobserver variability in GTV delineation on FDG-PET-CT images of head and neck cancers [J].
Breen, Stephen L. ;
Publicover, Julia ;
De Silva, Shiroma ;
Pond, Greg ;
Brock, Kristy ;
O'Sullivan, Brian ;
Cummings, Bernard ;
Dawson, Laura ;
Keller, Anne ;
Kim, John ;
Ringash, Jolie ;
Yu, Eugene ;
Hendler, Aaron ;
Waldron, John .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2007, 68 (03) :763-770
[6]   An evaluation of the variability of tumor-shape definition derived by experienced observers from CT images of supraglottic carcinomas (ACRIN protocol 6658) [J].
Cooper, Jay S. ;
Mukherji, Suresh K. ;
Toledano, Alicia Y. ;
Beldon, Clifford ;
Schmalfuss, Ilona M. ;
Amdur, Robert ;
Sailer, Scott ;
Loevner, Laurie A. ;
Kousouboris, Phil ;
Ang, K. Kian ;
Cormack, Jean ;
Sicks, JoRean .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2007, 67 (04) :972-975
[7]   Tumor volume in pharyngolaryngeal squamous cell carcinoma:: Comparison at CT, MR imaging, and FDG PET and validation with surgical specimen [J].
Daisne, JF ;
Duprez, T ;
Weynand, B ;
Lonneux, M ;
Hamoir, M ;
Reychler, H ;
Grégoire, V .
RADIOLOGY, 2004, 233 (01) :93-100
[8]   Rational diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck region:: Comparative evaluation of CT, MRI, and 18FDG PET [J].
Dammann, F ;
Horger, M ;
Mueller-Berg, M ;
Schlemmer, H ;
Claussen, C ;
Hoffman, J ;
Eschmann, S ;
Bares, R .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2005, 184 (04) :1326-1331
[9]   Does registration of pet and planning CT images decrease interobserver and intraobserver variation in delineating tumor volumes for non-small-cell lung cancer? [J].
Fox, JL ;
Rengan, R ;
O'Meara, W ;
Yorke, E ;
Erdi, Y ;
Nehmeh, S ;
Leibel, SA ;
Rosenzweig, KE .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2005, 62 (01) :70-75
[10]   Combined PET-CT in the head and neck Part 2. Diagnostic uses and pitfalls of oncologic imaging [J].
Fukui, MB ;
Blodgett, TM ;
Snyderman, CH ;
Johnson, JJ ;
Myers, EN ;
Townsend, DW ;
Meltzer, CC .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 2005, 25 (04) :913-930