Competitive Entry of Information Goods Under Quality Uncertainty

被引:29
作者
Zhang, Zan [1 ]
Nan, Guofang [2 ]
Li, Minqiang [2 ]
Tan, Yong [3 ]
机构
[1] Beihang Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China
[2] Tianjin Univ, Coll Management & Econ, Tianjin 300072, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Washington, Michael G Foster Sch Business, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
competitive strategy; product uncertainty; vertical differentiation; behavior-based pricing; PRODUCT DIFFERENTIATION; PRICE-COMPETITION; FREE TRIAL; SOFTWARE; MARKETS; IMPACT; DISCRIMINATION; DISCLOSURE; MODEL;
D O I
10.1287/mnsc.2021.3978
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
When confronted with a new product, consumers often find it difficult to predict how it will perform, and such uncertainty reduces consumers' willingness to adopt the product. In this paper, we consider a market whereby consumers decide when and which product to buy, given that they know the product quality of the incumbent but are uncertain about that of the entrant. We investigate how consumer uncertainty about product quality affects firms' behavior-based pricing and customer acquisition and retention dynamics. Using a two-period vertical model, we find that, under high-end encroachment, an increase in consumer uncertainty reduces the entrant's profit and hurts the incumbent's profit when the quality differential between the products is relatively small, whereas, under low-end encroachment, increasing uncertainty not only benefits the incumbent but also can favor the entrant. An important implication for entrants is that the marketing activities, which aim to reduce consumer uncertainty about product functionalities, may fail to improve profitability. We also find that the entrant lowers the price for uninformed customers and raises the price for repeat buyers under high-end encroachment but lowers the price for all customers under low-end encroachment. We further examine the subsidy strategy and show that, when the entrant's product has a significant quality advantage and consumer uncertainty is high but not very high, the optimal strategy for the entrant is to acquire all consumers who do not buy from the incumbent by providing subsidies and to drop the low-valuation customers by means of a high price after their uncertainty is resolved.
引用
收藏
页码:2869 / 2888
页数:21
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
BAGWELL K, 1991, AM ECON REV, V81, P224
[2]   INFORMATIONAL PRODUCT DIFFERENTIATION AS A BARRIER TO ENTRY [J].
BAGWELL, K .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION, 1990, 8 (02) :207-223
[3]   MULTIPERIOD COMPETITION WITH SWITCHING COSTS [J].
BEGGS, A ;
KLEMPERER, P .
ECONOMETRICA, 1992, 60 (03) :651-666
[4]   Quality uncertainty mitigates product differentiation [J].
Bester, H .
RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1998, 29 (04) :828-844
[5]   Buyer-initiated vs. seller-initiated information revelation [J].
Bhardwaj, Pradeep ;
Chen, Yuxin ;
Godes, David .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2008, 54 (06) :1104-1114
[6]   Strategic Loyalty Reward in Dynamic Price Discrimination [J].
Caillaud, Bernard ;
De Nijs, Romain .
MARKETING SCIENCE, 2014, 33 (05) :725-742
[7]   Optimal Software Free Trial Strategy: The Impact of Network Externalities and Consumer Uncertainty [J].
Cheng, Hsing Kenneth ;
Liu, Yipeng .
INFORMATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2012, 23 (02) :488-504
[8]   Free trial or no free trial: Optimal software product design with network effects [J].
Cheng, Hsing Kenneth ;
Tang, Qian Candy .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2010, 205 (02) :437-447
[9]   Comparison of software quality under perpetual licensing and software as a service [J].
Choudhary, Vidyanand .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2007, 24 (02) :141-165
[10]   ENDOGENOUS ENTRY IN MARKETS WITH UNOBSERVED QUALITY [J].
Creane, Anthony ;
Jeitschko, Thomas D. .
JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS, 2016, 64 (03) :494-519