Compositional Genetic Programming for Symbolic Regression

被引:0
|
作者
Krawiec, Krzysztof [1 ]
Kossinski, Dominik [1 ]
机构
[1] Poznan Univ Tech, Inst Comp Sci, Poznan, Poland
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2022 GENETIC AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION CONFERENCE COMPANION, GECCO 2022 | 2022年
关键词
Genetic programming; symbolic regression; modularity; semantic genetic programming; CROSSOVER;
D O I
10.1145/3520304.3529077
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
In genetic programming, candidate solutions are compositional structures that can be easily decomposed into constituent parts and assembled from them. This property is extensively used in search operators, but rarely exploited in other stages of evolutionary search. We propose an approach to symbolic regression that augments the search state by maintaining, apart from the population of candidate solutions, a library of subprograms and a library of program contexts, i.e. partial programs that need to be supplemented by a subprogram to form a complete program. This allows us to identify the promising program components and guide search using two mechanisms in parallel: the conventional fitness-based selection pressure, and matching contexts with subprograms using a gradient-based mechanism. In experimental assessment, the approach significantly outperforms the control setups and the conventional GP. Maintaining subprograms and contexts in efficient data structures prevents redundancy and lessens the demand for computational resources, in particular memory.
引用
收藏
页码:570 / 573
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Sequential Symbolic Regression with Genetic Programming
    Oliveira, Luiz Otavio V. B.
    Otero, Fernando E. B.
    Pappa, Gisele L.
    Albinati, Julio
    GENETIC PROGRAMMING THEORY AND PRACTICE XII, 2015, : 73 - 90
  • [2] Symbolic regression via genetic programming
    Augusto, DA
    Barbosa, HJC
    SIXTH BRAZILIAN SYMPOSIUM ON NEURAL NETWORKS, VOL 1, PROCEEDINGS, 2000, : 173 - 178
  • [3] Statistical genetic programming for symbolic regression
    Haeri, Maryam Amir
    Ebadzadeh, Mohammad Mehdi
    Folino, Gianluigi
    APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2017, 60 : 447 - 469
  • [4] The Inefficiency of Genetic Programming for Symbolic Regression
    Kronberger, Gabriel
    de Franca, Fabricio Olivetti
    Desmond, Harry
    Bartlett, Deaglan J.
    Kammerer, Lukas
    PARALLEL PROBLEM SOLVING FROM NATURE-PPSN XVIII, PPSN 2024, PT I, 2024, 15148 : 273 - 289
  • [5] On improving genetic programming for symbolic regression
    Gustafson, S
    Burke, EK
    Krasnogor, N
    2005 IEEE CONGRESS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, VOLS 1-3, PROCEEDINGS, 2005, : 912 - 919
  • [6] Taylor Genetic Programming for Symbolic Regression
    He, Baihe
    Lu, Qiang
    Yang, Qingyun
    Luo, Jake
    Wang, Zhiguang
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2022 GENETIC AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION CONFERENCE (GECCO'22), 2022, : 946 - 954
  • [7] Lifetime Adaptation in Genetic Programming for the Symbolic Regression
    Merta, Jan
    Brandejsky, Tomas
    COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS AND MATHEMATICAL MODELING METHODS IN INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, VOL. 2, 2019, 1047 : 339 - 346
  • [8] Symbol Graph Genetic Programming for Symbolic Regression
    Song, Jinglu
    Lu, Qiang
    Tian, Bozhou
    Zhang, Jingwen
    Luo, Jake
    Wang, Zhiguang
    PARALLEL PROBLEM SOLVING FROM NATURE-PPSN XVIII, PPSN 2024, PT I, 2024, 15148 : 221 - 237
  • [9] A new genetic programming approach in symbolic regression
    Xiong, SW
    Wang, WW
    Li, F
    15TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON TOOLS WITH ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 161 - 165
  • [10] Multifactorial Genetic Programming for Symbolic Regression Problems
    Zhong, Jinghui
    Feng, Liang
    Cai, Wentong
    Ong, Yew-Soon
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN CYBERNETICS-SYSTEMS, 2020, 50 (11): : 4492 - 4505