Three-Dimensional versus Two-Dimensional Evaluations of Cranial Asymmetry in Deformational Plagiocephaly Using a Three-Dimensional Scanner

被引:9
|
作者
Kato, Risa [1 ]
Nagano, Nobuhiko [1 ]
Hashimoto, Shin [2 ]
Saito, Katsuya [2 ]
Miyabayashi, Hiroshi [2 ]
Noto, Takanori [1 ,3 ]
Morioka, Ichiro [1 ]
机构
[1] Nihon Univ, Dept Pediat & Child Hlth, Sch Med, Itabashi Ku, Oyaguchi Kamimachi, Tokyo 1738610, Japan
[2] Kasukabe Med Ctr, Dept Pediat, Saitama 3448588, Japan
[3] Noto Childrens Clin, Nerima Ku, Tokyo 1790084, Japan
来源
CHILDREN-BASEL | 2022年 / 9卷 / 06期
关键词
anterior symmetry ratio; cranial asymmetry; head deformity; plagiocephaly; posterior symmetry ratio; HELMET THERAPY; RELIABILITY;
D O I
10.3390/children9060788
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
This study aimed to assess the measurement precision of a three-dimensional (3D) scanner that detects the geometric shape as surface data and to investigate the differences between two-dimensional (2D) and 3D evaluations in infants with deformational plagiocephaly. Using the 3D scanner that can perform both 2D and 3D evaluations, we calculated cranial asymmetry (CA) for the 2D evaluation, and the anterior symmetry ratio (ASR) and posterior symmetry ratio (PSR) for the 3D evaluation. Intra- and inter-examiner precision analyses revealed that the coefficients of the variation measurements were extremely low (<1%) for all variables, except CA (5%). In 530 infants, the coincidence rate of CA severity by the 2D evaluation and the 3D evaluation was 83.4%. A disagreement on severity was found between 2D and 3D evaluations in 88 infants (16.6%): 68 infants (12.8%) were assessed as severe by 2D evaluation and mild by the 3D evaluation, while 20 infants (3.8%) were evaluated as mild by 2D and severe by 3D evaluation. Overall, the 2D evaluation identified more infants as severe than the 3D evaluation. The 3D evaluation proved more precise than the 2D evaluation. We found that approximately one in six infants differed in severity between 2D and 3D evaluations.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Are Three-Dimensional Monitors More Appropriate Than Two-Dimensional Monitors in the Three-Dimensional Analysis?
    Ahn, Jaemyung
    Hong, Jongrak
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2017, 28 (01) : E101 - E104
  • [22] Three-dimensional architectures constructed using two-dimensional nanosheets
    Haoyi Li
    Xun Wang
    Science China Chemistry, 2015, 58 : 1792 - 1799
  • [23] Three-Dimensional Tracking of an Aircraft Using Two-Dimensional Radars
    Mallick, Mahendra
    Arulampalam, Sanjeev
    Yan, Yanjun
    Ru, Jifeng
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AEROSPACE AND ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS, 2018, 54 (02) : 585 - 600
  • [24] Three-dimensional architectures constructed using two-dimensional nanosheets
    Haoyi Li
    Xun Wang
    Science China(Chemistry), 2015, (12) : 1792 - 1799
  • [25] Three-dimensional architectures constructed using two-dimensional nanosheets
    Li, Haoyi
    Wang, Xun
    SCIENCE CHINA-CHEMISTRY, 2015, 58 (12) : 1792 - 1799
  • [26] Two-dimensional versus three-dimensional cell counting: a practical perspective
    Benes, FM
    Lange, N
    TRENDS IN NEUROSCIENCES, 2001, 24 (01) : 11 - 17
  • [27] Two-dimensional versus three-dimensional radiographic measurements of polyethylene wear
    Sychterz, CJ
    Yang, AM
    McAuley, JP
    Engh, CA
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 1999, (365) : 117 - 123
  • [28] Two-dimensional versus three-dimensional CT scan for aortic measurement
    Dillavou, ED
    Buck, DG
    Muluk, SC
    Makaroun, MS
    JOURNAL OF ENDOVASCULAR THERAPY, 2003, 10 (03) : 531 - 538
  • [29] Three-Dimensional Versus Two-Dimensional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Systematic Review
    Komaei, Iman
    Navarra, Giuseppe
    Curro, Giuseppe
    JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2017, 27 (08): : 790 - 794
  • [30] Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional vision in laparoscopy: a systematic review
    Sorensen, Stine Maya Dreier
    Savran, Mona Meral
    Konge, Lars
    Bjerrum, Flemming
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2016, 30 (01): : 11 - 23