Dose-response relationship of pregabalin in patients with generalized anxiety disorder. A pooled analysis of four placebo-controlled trials

被引:63
作者
Bech, P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Frederiksborg Cent Cty Hosp, Psychiat Res Unit, DK-3400 Hillerod, Denmark
关键词
D O I
10.1055/s-2007-984400
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background: Pregabalin has been evaluated in randomised clinical trials in patients with generalised anxiety disorder (GAD) in a fixed-dose design and with the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) as outcome measure. Four of the available six placebo-controlled trials were found acceptable for a pooled analysis of dose-response relationship. Method: Both the full HAM-A(14) and the six-item subscale covering the core items of GAD (HAM-A(6)) were analysed. The unbiased effect size statistic was used to evaluate the advantage of pregabalin over placebo. An effect size of 0.40 or higher was used to indicate a clinically significant effect. Results: Four placebo-controlled trials running over four weeks and covering the dose rangefrom 150 mg to 600 mg pregabalin were sufficiently homogeneous to be pooled for the analysis. Both HAM-A(6) and HAM-A(14) showed that for the dose of 150 mg pregabalin daily the effect size was clearly below 0.40. For the dose range of 200-450 mg daily, the effect sizes exceeded 0.40, with a plateau-like curve. The maximum dose of 600 mg daily did not increase effect size. On the HAM-A(14) as well as the item of sleep, effect size was generally higher, but followed the same pattern as the HAM-A(6) Discussion: The dose of 150 mg pregabalin over the four weeks of the trials was found insufficient for the treatment of GAD. In the dose range of 200-450 mg daily, a clinically significant effect was obtained, although with a plateau-like curve which was not increased for the maximum dose of 600 mg daily.
引用
收藏
页码:163 / 168
页数:6
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] Efficacy of sertraline in a 12-week trial for generalized anxiety disorder
    Allgulander, C
    Dahl, AA
    Austin, C
    Morris, PLP
    Sogaard, JA
    Fayyad, R
    Kutcher, SP
    Clary, CM
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2004, 161 (09) : 1642 - 1649
  • [2] American Psychiatric Association, 1980, Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-IV-TR, V3rd
  • [3] CONSENSUS CONFERENCE ON THE METHODOLOGY OF CLINICAL-TRIALS OF ANTIDEPRESSANTS, ZURICH, MARCH 1988 - REPORT OF THE CONSENSUS COMMITTEE
    ANGST, J
    BECH, P
    BOYER, P
    BRUINVELS, J
    ENGEL, R
    HELMCHEN, H
    HIPPIUS, H
    LINGJAERDE, O
    RACAGNI, G
    SALETU, B
    SEDVALL, G
    SILVERSTONE, JT
    STEFANIS, CN
    STOLL, K
    WOGGON, B
    [J]. PHARMACOPSYCHIATRY, 1989, 22 (01) : 3 - 7
  • [4] ANSSEAU M, 1992, BIOL PSYCHIAT, V31, P109
  • [5] The Hamilton depression rating scale: Has the gold standard become a lead weight?
    Bagby, RM
    Ryder, AG
    Schuller, DR
    Marshall, MB
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2004, 161 (12) : 2163 - 2177
  • [6] Evidence-based pharmacotherapy of generalized anxiety disorder
    Baldwin, DS
    Polkinghorn, C
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2005, 8 (02) : 293 - 302
  • [7] Bandelow Borwin, 2002, World J Biol Psychiatry, V3, P171, DOI 10.3109/15622970209150621
  • [8] Effective dose of escitalopram in moderate versus severe DSM-IV major depression
    Bech, P.
    Andersen, H. F.
    Wade, A.
    [J]. PHARMACOPSYCHIATRY, 2006, 39 (04) : 128 - 134
  • [9] Citalopram dose-response revisited using an alternative psychometric approach to evaluate clinical effects of four fixed citalopram doses compared to placebo in patients with major depression
    Bech, P
    Tanghoj, P
    Andersen, HF
    Overo, K
    [J]. PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2002, 163 (01) : 20 - 25
  • [10] Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of fluoxetine v. placebo and tricyclic antidepressants in the short-term treatment of major depression
    Bech, P
    Cialdella, P
    Haugh, MC
    Birkett, MA
    Hours, A
    Boissel, JP
    Tollefson, GD
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2000, 176 : 421 - 428