Dose-response relationship of pregabalin in patients with generalized anxiety disorder. A pooled analysis of four placebo-controlled trials

被引:63
作者
Bech, P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Frederiksborg Cent Cty Hosp, Psychiat Res Unit, DK-3400 Hillerod, Denmark
关键词
D O I
10.1055/s-2007-984400
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background: Pregabalin has been evaluated in randomised clinical trials in patients with generalised anxiety disorder (GAD) in a fixed-dose design and with the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) as outcome measure. Four of the available six placebo-controlled trials were found acceptable for a pooled analysis of dose-response relationship. Method: Both the full HAM-A(14) and the six-item subscale covering the core items of GAD (HAM-A(6)) were analysed. The unbiased effect size statistic was used to evaluate the advantage of pregabalin over placebo. An effect size of 0.40 or higher was used to indicate a clinically significant effect. Results: Four placebo-controlled trials running over four weeks and covering the dose rangefrom 150 mg to 600 mg pregabalin were sufficiently homogeneous to be pooled for the analysis. Both HAM-A(6) and HAM-A(14) showed that for the dose of 150 mg pregabalin daily the effect size was clearly below 0.40. For the dose range of 200-450 mg daily, the effect sizes exceeded 0.40, with a plateau-like curve. The maximum dose of 600 mg daily did not increase effect size. On the HAM-A(14) as well as the item of sleep, effect size was generally higher, but followed the same pattern as the HAM-A(6) Discussion: The dose of 150 mg pregabalin over the four weeks of the trials was found insufficient for the treatment of GAD. In the dose range of 200-450 mg daily, a clinically significant effect was obtained, although with a plateau-like curve which was not increased for the maximum dose of 600 mg daily.
引用
收藏
页码:163 / 168
页数:6
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   Efficacy of sertraline in a 12-week trial for generalized anxiety disorder [J].
Allgulander, C ;
Dahl, AA ;
Austin, C ;
Morris, PLP ;
Sogaard, JA ;
Fayyad, R ;
Kutcher, SP ;
Clary, CM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2004, 161 (09) :1642-1649
[2]  
American Psychiatric Association, 1980, Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-IV-TR, V3rd
[3]   CONSENSUS CONFERENCE ON THE METHODOLOGY OF CLINICAL-TRIALS OF ANTIDEPRESSANTS, ZURICH, MARCH 1988 - REPORT OF THE CONSENSUS COMMITTEE [J].
ANGST, J ;
BECH, P ;
BOYER, P ;
BRUINVELS, J ;
ENGEL, R ;
HELMCHEN, H ;
HIPPIUS, H ;
LINGJAERDE, O ;
RACAGNI, G ;
SALETU, B ;
SEDVALL, G ;
SILVERSTONE, JT ;
STEFANIS, CN ;
STOLL, K ;
WOGGON, B .
PHARMACOPSYCHIATRY, 1989, 22 (01) :3-7
[4]  
ANSSEAU M, 1992, BIOL PSYCHIAT, V31, P109
[5]   The Hamilton depression rating scale: Has the gold standard become a lead weight? [J].
Bagby, RM ;
Ryder, AG ;
Schuller, DR ;
Marshall, MB .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2004, 161 (12) :2163-2177
[6]   Evidence-based pharmacotherapy of generalized anxiety disorder [J].
Baldwin, DS ;
Polkinghorn, C .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2005, 8 (02) :293-302
[7]  
Bandelow Borwin, 2002, World J Biol Psychiatry, V3, P171, DOI 10.3109/15622970209150621
[8]   Effective dose of escitalopram in moderate versus severe DSM-IV major depression [J].
Bech, P. ;
Andersen, H. F. ;
Wade, A. .
PHARMACOPSYCHIATRY, 2006, 39 (04) :128-134
[9]   Citalopram dose-response revisited using an alternative psychometric approach to evaluate clinical effects of four fixed citalopram doses compared to placebo in patients with major depression [J].
Bech, P ;
Tanghoj, P ;
Andersen, HF ;
Overo, K .
PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2002, 163 (01) :20-25
[10]   Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of fluoxetine v. placebo and tricyclic antidepressants in the short-term treatment of major depression [J].
Bech, P ;
Cialdella, P ;
Haugh, MC ;
Birkett, MA ;
Hours, A ;
Boissel, JP ;
Tollefson, GD .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2000, 176 :421-428