Validation of a new D-dimer microparticle enzyme immunoassay (AxSYM D-Dimer) in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism (PE)

被引:19
作者
Ghanima, W. [1 ]
Sandset, P. M.
机构
[1] Ostfold Hosp Trust Fredrikstad, Dept Med, N-1603 Fredrikstad, Norway
[2] Ullevaal Univ Hosp, Dept Hematol, Oslo, Norway
[3] Univ Oslo, Med Clin, Fac Div Ulleval Univ Hosp, Oslo, Norway
关键词
D-dimer; pulmonary embolism; sensitivity; specificity; ROC curve;
D O I
10.1016/j.thromres.2006.11.005
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: The aim of the study was to evaluate a new automated assay for D-dimer testing (AxSYM D-Dimer) based on microparticle enzyme-immunoassay technology by comparing it with three well established D-dimer assays. Patients and methods: The performance of the new assay was evaluated in 280 plasma samples that were collected prospectively from out-patients included in a management study evaluating a decision based algorithm. Results: 58/280 patients (21%) had PE diagnosed by CT Median values of AxSYM D-dimer in patients with PE were 3689 ng/mL (range 775-9000). Comparison analysis displayed excellent agreement with VIDAS (kappa=0.84) and Asserachrom (kappa=0.81) D-dimer assays. A strong correlation was found between AxSYM and the VIDAS (r=0.96) and Asserachrom (r=0.89) D-dimer assays. The highest cut-off value for AxSYM that yielded a sensitivity of 100% was 765 ng/mL with a specificity of 50%. At the cut-off level < 500 ng/mL, the sensitivity and specificity of AxSYM D-dimer were 100% and 34%; VIDAS 100% and 42%; Asserachrom 100% and 40%; and STALiatest 100% and 37%, respectively. AxSYM D-dimer was negative in 75 patients (33.8%). None of these had PE at the initial work-up or VTE during the 3-month follow-up. Conclusions: AxSYM D-dimer seems to be safe and effective in ruling out PE in outpatients. The cut-off level can be set at 500 to 750 ng/mL, at which the assay displays a performance that is comparable to that of the ELISA based assays. However, further studies are needed to confirm the safety of the assay and to determine the most optimal cut-off level in patients with venous thromboembolism. (c) 2006 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:471 / 476
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
Altman DG, 1996, Practical Statistics for Medical Research
[2]   D-dimer for the diagnosis of venous thromboembolism [J].
Anderson, DR ;
Wells, PS .
CURRENT OPINION IN HEMATOLOGY, 2000, 7 (05) :296-301
[3]   Plasma D-dimers: comparison of ELISA with a new, rapid, quantitative latex assay [J].
Barro, C ;
Bosson, JL ;
Pernod, G ;
Carpentier, PH ;
Polack, B .
CLINICAL AND LABORATORY HAEMATOLOGY, 1999, 21 (05) :363-364
[4]   A latex D-dimer reliably excludes venous thromboembolism [J].
Bates, SM ;
Grand'Maison, A ;
Johnston, M ;
Naguit, I ;
Kovacs, MJ ;
Ginsberg, JS .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2001, 161 (03) :447-453
[5]  
Campbell IA, 2003, THORAX, V58, P470
[6]  
Dempfle CE, 2001, THROMB HAEMOSTASIS, V85, P671
[7]   A new quantitative D-dimer assay appropriate in emergency: Reliability of the assay for pulmonary embolism exclusion diagnosis [J].
Duet, M ;
Benelhadj, S ;
Kedra, W ;
Vilain, D ;
Ajzenberg, C ;
Elkharrat, D ;
Drouet, L ;
Soria, C ;
Mundler, O .
THROMBOSIS RESEARCH, 1998, 91 (01) :1-5
[8]   Normal D-dimer levels in emergency department patients suspected of acute pulmonary embolism [J].
Dunn, KL ;
Wolf, JP ;
Dorfman, DM ;
Fitzpatrick, P ;
Baker, JL ;
Goldhaber, SZ .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2002, 40 (08) :1475-1478
[9]   Diagnosis accuracy of a new challenger for thrombosis exclusion, the Stratus® CS DDMR [J].
Freyburger, GV ;
Reboul, MP ;
Labrouche, S ;
Saillour, F ;
Grenier, N .
CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2005, 354 (1-2) :181-189
[10]   MONOCLONAL-ANTIBODIES TO CROSSLINKED FIBRIN DEGRADATION PRODUCTS (XL-FDP) .2. EVALUATION IN A VARIETY OF CLINICAL CONDITIONS [J].
GAFFNEY, PJ ;
CREIGHTON, LJ ;
CALLUS, M ;
THORPE, R .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, 1988, 68 (01) :91-96