Inter-pregnancy interval and risk of recurrent pre-eclampsia: systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:36
作者
Cormick, Gabriela [1 ,2 ]
Betran, Ana Pilar [3 ]
Ciapponi, Agustin [2 ,4 ]
Hall, David R. [5 ,6 ]
Hofmeyr, G. Justus [7 ]
机构
[1] Inst Clin Effectiveness & Hlth Policy IECS, Dept Mother & Child Hlth Res, Emilio Ravignani 2024, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
[2] CONICET IECS, CIESP, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
[3] WHO, Dept Reprod Hlth & Res, Ave Appia 20, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland
[4] Inst Clin Effectiveness & Hlth Policy IECS, Argentine Cochrane Branch, Emilio Ravignani 2024, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
[5] Univ Stellenbosch, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Cape Town, South Africa
[6] Tygerberg Hosp, Cape Town, South Africa
[7] Walter Sisulu Univ, Univ Ft Hare, Univ Witwatersrand, Eastern Cape Dept Hlth,Effect Care Res Unit, East London, South Africa
基金
比尔及梅琳达.盖茨基金会;
关键词
Recurrence; Pre-eclampsia; Eclampsia; Inter-pregnancy interval; Birth interval; Meta-analysis; Systematic review; Birth spacing; Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy; INTERPREGNANCY INTERVAL; HYPERTENSIVE DISORDERS; CHANGING PATERNITY; PARTNER CHANGE; MANAGEMENT; DIAGNOSIS; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1186/s12978-016-0197-x
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Women with a history of pre-eclampsia have a higher risk of developing pre-eclampsia in subsequent pregnancies. However, the role of the inter-pregnancy interval on this association is unclear. Objective: To explore the effect of inter-pregnancy interval on the risk of recurrent pre-eclampsia or eclampia. Search strategy: MEDLINE, EMBASE and LILACS were searched (inception to July 2015). Selection criteria: Cohort studies assessing the risk of recurrent pre-eclampsia in the immediate subsequent pregnancy according to different birth intervals. Data collection and analysis: Two reviewers independently performed screening, data extraction, methodological and quality assessment. Meta-analysis of adjusted odds ratios (aOR) with 95 % confidence intervals (CI) was used to measure the association between various interval lengths and recurrent pre-eclampsia or eclampsia. Main results: We identified 1769 articles and finally included four studies with a total of 77,561 women. The meta-analysis of two studies showed that compared to inter-pregnancy intervals of 2-4 years, the aOR for recurrent pre-eclampsia was 1. 01 [95 % CI 0.95 to 1.07, I-2 0 %] with intervals of less than 2 years and 1.10 [95 % CI 1.02 to 1.19, I-2 0 %] with intervals longer than 4 years. Conclusion: Compared to inter-pregnancy intervals of 2 to 4 years, shorter intervals are not associated with an increased risk of recurrent pre-eclampsia but longer intervals appear to increase the risk. The results of this review should be interpreted with caution as included studies are observational and thus subject to possible confounding factors.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Epidemiologic approaches for studying recurrent pregnancy outcomes: Challenges and implications for research [J].
Ananth, Cande V. .
SEMINARS IN PERINATOLOGY, 2007, 31 (03) :196-201
[2]  
[Anonymous], HYP PREG MAN HYP DIS
[3]  
[Anonymous], HYP DIS PREGN GUID S
[4]  
[Anonymous], ISPOR 3 LAT AM C MEX
[5]  
[Anonymous], OBSTET GYNECOL
[6]  
[Anonymous], COCHRANE HDB SYSTEMA
[7]  
[Anonymous], GUIDELINES MANAGEMEN
[8]   Prediction and prevention of recurrent preeclampsia [J].
Barton, John R. ;
Sibai, Baha M. .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 112 (02) :359-372
[9]   Higher risk of pre-eclampsia after change of partner. An effect of longer interpregnancy intervals? [J].
Basso, O ;
Christensen, K ;
Olsen, J .
EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2001, 12 (06) :624-629
[10]   Adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes in women with previous preeclampsia: a prospective study [J].
Bramham, Kate ;
Briley, Annette L. ;
Seed, Paul ;
Poston, Lucilla ;
Shennan, Andrew H. ;
Chappell, Lucy C. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2011, 204 (06) :512.e1-512.e9