On the application of Exploratory Data Analysis for characterization of space weather data sets

被引:3
作者
Krause, L. Habash [1 ]
Franz, A. [2 ]
Stevenson, A. [2 ]
机构
[1] NASA Marshall Spaceflight Ctr, Space Sci Off, Marshall Space Flight Ctr 4207, Huntsville, AL 35808 USA
[2] USAF Acad, Dept Phys, Colorado Springs, CO 80840 USA
关键词
Ionosphere; Space weather; hmF2; Exploratory Data Analysis; Principle Components Analysis; Common Factor Analysis; INTERNATIONAL REFERENCE IONOSPHERE; GEOMAGNETIC ACTIVITY; INDEXES; GEOEFFECTIVENESS; PLASMA; MODEL; WIND;
D O I
10.1016/j.asr.2011.03.017
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
This paper presents an overview of the mathematical foundations for techniques in Exploratory Data Analysis (EDA) for the purpose of investigating the relationships among the numerous variables in large sets of multivariate space weather data. Specifically, we cover techniques in Principal Components Analysis (PCA) and Common Factor Analysis (CFA). These techniques are illustrated using space weather activity indices collected during the year 2002 and the corresponding noon-time hmF2 data from the International Reference Ionosphere (IRI). A CFA is used to categorize the activity indices, and a PCA is used to derive two macro-indices of activity to ascertain the strength of solar and geomagnetic activity. These macro-indices are then used to compare and contrast IRI's noon-time hmF2 values at six different geographic stations. It was found that the correlation between hmF2 and the macro-indices more accurately represented the variation of this correlation with latitude found in previous studies than if we used an isolated conventional index, such as SSN and AE. We also found that the daily maximum value of the Polar Cap Index was dependent on both solar and geomagnetic activity, but the closely-related cross-Polar Cap Potential was solely associated with elevated levels of geomagnetic activity, which is a unique result compared to previous studies. We argue that the discrepancy can be explained by the difference in experiment designs between the two studies. This paper demonstrates the usefulness of EDA in space weather studies of large multivariate data sets. Published by Elsevier Ltd. on behalf of COSPAR.
引用
收藏
页码:2199 / 2209
页数:11
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] Equatorial F2-peak parameters in the IRI model
    Adeniyi, JO
    Bilitza, D
    Radicella, SM
    Willoughby, AA
    [J]. DESCRIPTION OF THE LOW LATITUDE AND EQUATORIAL IONOSPHERE IN THE INTERNATIONAL REFERENCE IONOSPHERE, 2003, 31 (03): : 507 - 512
  • [2] CROSS-POLAR CAP POTENTIAL DIFFERENCE, AURORAL ELECTROJET INDEXES, AND SOLAR-WIND PARAMETERS
    AHN, BH
    KAMIDE, Y
    KROEHL, HW
    GORNEY, DJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 1992, 97 (A2) : 1345 - 1352
  • [3] [Anonymous], COLLECTED WORKS JW T
  • [4] STORM: An empirical storm-time ionospheric correction model - 1. Model description
    Araujo-Pradere, EA
    Fuller-Rowell, TJ
    Codrescu, MV
    [J]. RADIO SCIENCE, 2002, 37 (05) : 3 - 1
  • [5] The importance of EUV indices for the International Reference Ionosphere
    Bilitza, D
    [J]. PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY OF THE EARTH PART C-SOLAR-TERRESTIAL AND PLANETARY SCIENCE, 2000, 25 (5-6): : 515 - 521
  • [6] International Reference Ionosphere 2000
    Bilitza, D
    [J]. RADIO SCIENCE, 2001, 36 (02) : 261 - 275
  • [7] EMPIRICAL RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN INTERPLANETARY CONDITIONS AND DST
    BURTON, RK
    MCPHERRON, RL
    RUSSELL, CT
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 1975, 80 (31): : 4204 - 4214
  • [8] Joule heating patterns as a function of polar cap index
    Chun, FK
    Knipp, DJ
    McHarg, MG
    Lacey, JR
    Lu, G
    Emery, BA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2002, 107 (A7)
  • [9] AURORAL ELECTROJET ACTIVITY INDEX AE AND ITS UNIVERSAL TIME VARIATIONS
    DAVIS, TN
    SUGIURA, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, 1966, 71 (03): : 785 - &
  • [10] C/NOFS:: a mission to forecast scintillations
    de La Beaujardière, O
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ATMOSPHERIC AND SOLAR-TERRESTRIAL PHYSICS, 2004, 66 (17) : 1573 - 1591