Experimental investigations and constitutive modeling of cyclic interface shearing between HDPE geomembrane and sandy gravel

被引:44
作者
Cen, W. J. [1 ]
Bauer, E. [2 ]
Wen, L. S. [1 ]
Wang, H. [1 ]
Sun, Y. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Hohai Univ, Coll Water Conservancy & Hydropower Engn, Nanjing 210098, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Graz Univ Technol, Inst Appl Mech, A-8010 Graz, Austria
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Geosynthetics; Geomembrane; Interface; Cyclic interface shear test; Constitutive model; Damping ratio; PARTICLE-SIZE; BEHAVIOR; SOIL; SCALE; STRENGTH; FRICTION; TESTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.geotexmem.2018.12.013
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
This paper presents the results of experimental investigations and constitutive modeling of cyclic interface shearing between HDPE geomembrane and cohesionless sandy gravel. A series of cyclic interface shear tests was performed using a large-scale cyclic shear apparatus with servo controlled system. Particular attention was paid to the influences of the amount of shear-displacement amplitude, number of cycles, shear rate and the normal pressure on the mechanical response. The experimental results show that the path of the shear stress against the cyclic shear displacement is strongly non-linear and forms a closed hysteresis loop, which is pressure dependent, but almost independent of the shear rate. For small shear-displacement amplitudes, the obtained damping ratio is significantly greater than zero, which is different to the behavior usually observed for cyclic soil to soil shearing. In order to describe the pressure dependency of the hysteresis loop using a single set of constitutive parameters, new approximation functions are put forward and embedded into the concept of the Masing rule. Further, a new empirical function is proposed for the damping ratios to capture the experimental data for both small and large cyclic shear-displacement amplitudes. The included model parameters are easy to calibrate and the new functions may also be useful in developing enhanced constitutive models for the simulation of the cyclic interface shear behavior between other geosynthetics and soils.
引用
收藏
页码:269 / 279
页数:11
相关论文
共 59 条
[31]   A Comparative Numerical Study on Soil–Geosynthetic Interactions Using Large Scale Direct Shear Test and Pullout Test [J].
Hegde A. ;
Roy R. .
International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering, 2018, 4 (1)
[32]   Load plate rigidity and scale effects on the frictional behavior of sand/geomembrane interfaces [J].
Hsieh, C ;
Hsieh, MW .
GEOTEXTILES AND GEOMEMBRANES, 2003, 21 (01) :25-47
[33]  
Koerner R.M., 2012, Designing with geosynthetics, V1
[34]  
Konder R.L., 1963, Journal of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Division ASCE, V89, P115
[35]   Large scale direct shear tests of soil/PET-yarn geogrid interfaces [J].
Liu, Chia-Nan ;
Ho, Yu-Hsien ;
Huang, Jian-Wen .
GEOTEXTILES AND GEOMEMBRANES, 2009, 27 (01) :19-30
[36]   Cyclic and post-cyclic behaviour from sand-geogrid interface large-scale direct shear tests [J].
Liu, F. -Y. ;
Wang, P. ;
Geng, X. ;
Wang, J. ;
Lin, X. .
GEOSYNTHETICS INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 23 (02) :129-139
[37]   A three-dimensional state-dependent model of soil-structure interface for monotonic and cyclic loadings [J].
Liu, Jingmao ;
Zou, Degao ;
Kong, Xianjing .
COMPUTERS AND GEOTECHNICS, 2014, 61 :166-177
[38]  
Mariappan S., 2008, Electronic Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, V13, P1
[39]   Performances of Landfill Liners under Dry and Wet Conditions [J].
Mariappan, Saravanan ;
Kamon, Masashi ;
Ali, Faisal ;
Katsumi, Takeshi ;
Akai, Tomoyuki ;
Inui, Toru ;
Nishimura, Masaki .
GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2011, 29 (05) :881-898
[40]  
Muller W. W., 2010, HDPE GEOMEMBRANES GE