Using a GIS-based network analysis to determine urban greenspace accessibility for different ethnic and religious groups

被引:527
作者
Comber, Alexis [1 ]
Brunsdon, Chris [1 ]
Green, Edmund [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leicester, Dept Geog, Leicester LE1 7RH, Leics, England
[2] Groundwork Trust Leicester & Leicestershire, Leicester LE3 6HX, Leics, England
关键词
greenspace; GIS; network analysis; ethnicity; religion; urban planning;
D O I
10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.01.002
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Greenspace access in an English city was analysed using a network analysis in a geographical information system (GIs). Access for different religious and ethnic groups was compared with benchmark standards that form part of the UK government guidance on greenspace provision. Despite having nearly more than twice the recommended amount of accessible greenspace per capita, its distribution and pattern show considerable variation especially when spatially analysed with respect to ethnic and religious groups. Whilst the specific results are locally important (Indian, Hindu and Sikh groups were found to have limited access to greenspace in the city), the study shows how a GIS-based network analysis in conjunction with statistical analysis of socio-economic data can be used to analyse the equity of access to community goods and services. The results can be used to inform the local planning process and the GIs approach can be expanded into other local authority domains. The approach presented in this paper offers a generic method for quantifying the differences in the provision of community goods and services (e.g. educational, health, environmental, etc.) for a range of different societal groups (e.g. related to deprivation, disability, occupation, economic activity, household tenure and types, age and health). (c) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:103 / 114
页数:12
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], POPULATION TRENDS
[2]   PEOPLE, PARKS AND THE URBAN GREEN - A STUDY OF POPULAR MEANINGS AND VALUES FOR OPEN SPACES IN THE CITY [J].
BURGESS, J ;
HARRISON, CM ;
LIMB, M .
URBAN STUDIES, 1988, 25 (06) :455-473
[3]  
FRIENDLY M, 1994, J AM STAT ASSOC, V89, P190
[4]  
Frumkin H, 2001, AM J PREV MED, V20, P47
[5]   Managing urban parks for a racially and ethnically diverse clientele [J].
Gobster, PH .
LEISURE SCIENCES, 2002, 24 (02) :143-159
[6]   The development of an evaluation method using a geographic information system to determine the importance of wasteland sites as urban wildlife areas [J].
Herbst, Harriet ;
Herbst, Volkmar .
LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2006, 77 (1-2) :178-195
[7]   The political ecology of uneven urban green space - The impact of political economy on race and ethnicity in producing environmental inequality in Milwaukee [J].
Heynen, Nik ;
Perkins, Harold A. ;
Roy, Parama .
URBAN AFFAIRS REVIEW, 2006, 42 (01) :3-25
[8]   Recreation-amenity use and contingent valuation of urban greenspaces in Guangzhou, China [J].
Jim, CY ;
Chen, WY .
LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2006, 75 (1-2) :81-96
[9]   Comprehensive greenspace planning based on landscape ecology principles in compact Nanjing city, China [J].
Jim, CY ;
Chen, SS .
LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2003, 65 (03) :95-116
[10]   Public parks and the geography of fear [J].
Madge, C .
TIJDSCHRIFT VOOR ECONOMISCHE EN SOCIALE GEOGRAFIE, 1997, 88 (03) :237-250