Cognitive templates for religious concepts: cross-cultural evidence for recall of counter-intuitive representations

被引:163
作者
Boyer, P
Ramble, C
机构
[1] Washington Univ, St Louis, MO 63130 USA
[2] Univ Oxford Wolfson Coll, Oxford OX2 6UD, England
关键词
religion; concepts; recall; distinctiveness;
D O I
10.1207/s15516709cog2504_2
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Presents results of free-recall experiments conducted in France, Gabon and Nepal, to test predictions of a cognitive model of religious concepts. The world over, these concepts include violations of conceptual expectations at the level of domain knowledge (e.g., about 'animal' or 'artifact' or 'person') rather than at the basic level. In five studies we used narratives to test the hypothesis that domain-level violations are recalled better than other conceptual associations. These studies used material constructed in the same way as religious concepts, but not used in religions familiar to the subjects. Experiments 1 and 2 confirmed a distinctiveness effect for such material. Experiment 3 shows that recall also depends on the possibility to generate inferences from violations of domain expectations. Replications in Gabon (Exp. 4) and Nepal (Exp. 5) showed that recall for domain-level violations is better than for violations of basic-level expectations. Overall sensitivity to violations is similar in different cultures and produces similar recall effects, despite differences in commitment to religious belief, in the range of local religious concepts or in their mode of transmission. However, differences between Gabon and Nepal results suggest that familiarity with some types of domain-level violations may paradoxically make other types more salient. These results suggest that recall effects may account for the recurrent features found in religious concepts from different cultures. (C) 2001 Cognitive Science Society, Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:535 / 564
页数:30
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]   CHILDRENS SENSITIVITY TO TOPICAL DISCONTINUITY IN JUDGING STORY ADEQUACY [J].
ACKERMAN, BP ;
SPIKER, K ;
GLICKMAN, I .
DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1990, 26 (05) :837-844
[2]   Dissociating brain responses to syntactic and semantic anomalies: Evidence from event-related potentials [J].
Ainsworth-Darnell, K ;
Shulman, HG ;
Boland, JE .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 1998, 38 (01) :112-130
[3]  
[Anonymous], CHILDS THEORY MIND
[4]  
[Anonymous], THESIS CORNELL U
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1996, J ROYAL ANTHR I
[6]  
[Anonymous], THOUGHT LANGUAGE
[7]   Conceptualizing a nonnatural entity: Anthropomorphism in God concepts [J].
Barrett, JL ;
Keil, FC .
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 31 (03) :219-247
[8]   Cognitive constraints on Hindu concepts of the divine [J].
Barrett, JL .
JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENTIFIC STUDY OF RELIGION, 1998, 37 (04) :608-619
[9]   Exploring the natural foundations of religion [J].
Barrett, JL .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2000, 4 (01) :29-34
[10]  
Bartlett Frederic., 1932, REMEMBERING