Magnetic Resonance Elastography of the Liver Qualitative and Quantitative Comparison of Gradient Echo and Spin Echo Echoplanar Imaging Sequences

被引:64
|
作者
Wagner, Mathilde [1 ]
Besa, Cecilia [1 ,2 ]
Ayache, Jad Bou [1 ,2 ]
Yasar, Temel Kaya [1 ]
Bane, Octavia [1 ]
Fung, Maggie [4 ]
Ehman, Richard L. [3 ]
Taouli, Bachir [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Translat & Mol Imaging Inst, New York, NY 10029 USA
[2] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Dept Radiol, New York, NY USA
[3] Mayo Clin, Dept Radiol, Rochester, MN USA
[4] GE Hlthcare, MR Applicat & Workflow, New York, NY USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
liver stiffness; magnetic resonance elastography; gradient recalled echo; spin echo echoplanar; CHRONIC HEPATITIS-C; MR ELASTOGRAPHY; NONINVASIVE ASSESSMENT; PORTAL-HYPERTENSION; ESOPHAGEAL-VARICES; FIBROSIS; STIFFNESS; REPEATABILITY; MULTIFREQUENCY; ELASTICITY;
D O I
10.1097/RLI.0000000000000269
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective: The aim of this study was to compare 2-dimensional (2D) gradient recalled echo (GRE) and 2D spin echo echoplanar imaging (SE-EPI) magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) sequences of the liver in terms of image quality and quantitative liver stiffness (LS) measurement. Materials and Methods: This prospective study involved 50 consecutive subjects (male/female, 33/17; mean age, 58 years) who underwent livermagnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 T including 2 MRE sequences, 2D GRE, and 2D SE-EPI (acquisition time 56 vs 16 seconds, respectively). Image quality scores were assessed by 2 independent observers based on wave propagation and organ coverage on the confidence map (range, 0-15). A third observer measured LS on stiffness maps (in kilopascal). Mean LS values, regions of interest size (based on confidence map), and image quality scores between SE-EPI and GRE-MRE were compared using paired nonparametric Wilcoxon test. Reproducibility of LS values between the 2 sequences was assessed using intraclass coefficient correlation, coefficient of variation, and Bland-Altman limits of agreement. T2* effect on image quality was assessed using partial Spearman correlation. Results: There were 4 cases of failure with GRE-MRE and none with SE-EPI-MRE. Image quality scores and region of interest size were significantly higher using SE-EPI-MRE versus GRE-MRE (P < 0.0001 for both measurements and observers). Liver stiffness measurements were not significantly different between the 2 sequences (3.75 +/- 1.87 kPa vs 3.55 +/- 1.51 kPa, P = 0.062), were significantly correlated (intraclass coefficient correlation, 0.909), and had excellent reproducibility (coefficient of variation, 10.2%; bias, 0.023; BlandAltman limits of agreement, -1.19; 1.66 kPa). Image quality scores using GRE-MRE were significantly correlated with T2* while therewas no correlation for SE-EPI-MRE. Conclusions: Our data suggest that SE-EPI-MRE may be a better alternative to GRE-MRE. The diagnostic performance of SE-EPI-MRE for detection of liver fibrosis needs to be assessed in a future study.
引用
收藏
页码:575 / 581
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of spin-echo echo-planar imaging magnetic resonance elastography with gradient-recalled echo magnetic resonance elastography and their correlation with transient elastography
    Yoon, Jin Woo
    Lee, Eun Sun
    Park, Hyun Jeong
    Park, Sung Bin
    Cho, Young Youn
    Kannengiesser, Stephan
    Hur, Joonho
    DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2022, 28 (04) : 294 - 300
  • [2] Comparison of spin-echo echo planar imaging and gradient-recalled echo sequences in magnetic resonance elastography of liver at 1.5T same MRI scanner
    Ryouna Abe
    Kei Fukuzawa
    Chiharu Yoshihara
    Masakatsu Tano
    Satoshi Saitoh
    Abdominal Radiology, 2024, 49 : 694 - 702
  • [3] Comparison of spin-echo echo planar imaging and gradient-recalled echo sequences in magnetic resonance elastography of liver at 1.5T same MRI scanner
    Abe, Ryouna
    Fukuzawa, Kei
    Yoshihara, Chiharu
    Tano, Masakatsu
    Saitoh, Satoshi
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2024, 49 (03) : 694 - 702
  • [4] Comparison of spin echo, gradient echo and fat saturation magnetic resonance imaging sequences for imaging the canine elbow
    Snaps, FR
    Saunders, JH
    Park, RD
    Daenen, B
    Balligand, MH
    Dondelinger, RF
    VETERINARY RADIOLOGY & ULTRASOUND, 1998, 39 (06) : 518 - 523
  • [5] Fat suppression magnetic resonance imaging of the triangular fibrocartilage complex - Comparison with spin echo, gradient echo pulse sequences and histology
    Nakamura, T
    Yabe, Y
    Horiuchi, Y
    JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-BRITISH AND EUROPEAN VOLUME, 1999, 24B (01): : 22 - 26
  • [6] Comparison of spin-echo echoplanar imaging and gradient recalled echo-based MR elastography at 3 Tesla with and without gadoxetic acid administration
    Kim, Yong Seek
    Song, Ji Soo
    Kannengiesser, Stephan
    Seo, Seung Young
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2017, 27 (10) : 4120 - 4128
  • [7] Comparison of spin-echo echoplanar imaging and gradient recalled echo-based MR elastography at 3 Tesla with and without gadoxetic acid administration
    Yong Seek Kim
    Ji Soo Song
    Stephan Kannengiesser
    Seung Young Seo
    European Radiology, 2017, 27 : 4120 - 4128
  • [8] A COMPARISON OF FAST SPIN-ECHO AND GRADIENT FIELD ECHO SEQUENCES
    TKACH, JA
    HAACKE, EM
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1988, 6 (04) : 373 - 389
  • [9] Comparison of fast turbo-spin-echo and gradient-and-spin-echo sequences as well as echo planar imaging with conventional spin-echo sequences in MRI of focal liver lesions at 1.0 tesla.
    Jung, G
    Krahe, T
    Kugel, H
    Gieseke, J
    Walter, C
    Fischbach, R
    Landwehr, P
    ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 1996, 165 (02): : 137 - 143
  • [10] High isotropic resolution magnetic resonance imaging of the mandibular canal at 1.5 T: a comparison of gradient and spin echo sequences
    Kreutner, Jakob
    Hopfgartner, Andreas
    Weber, Daniel
    Boldt, Julian
    Rottner, Kurt
    Richter, Ernst
    Jakob, Peter Michael
    Haddad, Daniel
    DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 2017, 46 (02)