Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for elderly patients with choledocholithiasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:19
作者
Zhu, Jisheng [1 ]
Tu, Shuju [1 ]
Yang, Zhengjiang [1 ]
Fu, Xiaowei [1 ]
Li, Yong [1 ]
Xiao, Weidong [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanchang Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Gen Surg, 17 Yongwai Zhengjie, Nanchang 330006, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2020年 / 34卷 / 04期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Elderly patients; Choledocholithiasis; Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration; Gallstone clearance rate; Meta-analysis; ULTRATHIN CHOLEDOCHOSCOPE; PRIMARY CLOSURE; SINGLE-STAGE; MANAGEMENT; STONES; SAFE; CHOLANGIOGRAPHY; GALLSTONES; OUTCOMES; AGE;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-020-07394-x
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) has been becoming more and more popular in patients with symptomatic choledocholithiasis. However, the safety and effectiveness of LCBDE in elderly patients with choledocholithiasis is still uncertain. This meta-analysis is aimed to appraise the safety and feasibility of LCBDE for elderly patients with choledocholithiasis. Materials and methods Studies comparing elderly patients and younger patients who underwent LCBDE for common bile duct stone were reviewed and collected from the PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library. Primary outcomes were stone clearance rate, overall complication rate, and mortality rate. Secondary outcomes were operative time, conversion rate, pulmonary complication, bile leakage, reoperation, residual stone rate, and recurrent stone rate. Results Nine studies, including two prospective studies and seven retrospective studies, met the inclusion criteria. There were 2004 patients in this meta-analysis, including 693 elderly patients and 1311 younger patients. There was no statistically significant difference between elderly patients and younger patients regarding stone clearance rate (OR 0.73; 95% CI 0.42-1.26; p = 0.25), overall complication rate (OR 1.31; 95% CI 0.94-1.82; p = 0.12), and mortality rate (OR 2.80; 95% CI 0.82-9.53; p = 0.10). Similarly, the operative time, conversion rate, bile leakage, reoperation, residual stone rate, and recurrent stone rate showed no significant difference between two groups (p > 0.05). While elderly patients showed high risk for pulmonary complication (OR 4.41; 95% CI 1.78-10.93; p = 0.001) compared with younger patients. Conclusion Although there is associated with higher pulmonary complication, LCBDE is still considered as a safe and effective treatment for elderly patients with choledocholithiasis.
引用
收藏
页码:1522 / 1533
页数:12
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Meta-analysis of one- vs. two-stage laparoscopic/endoscopic management of common bile duct stones [J].
Alexakis, Nicholas ;
Connor, Saxon .
HPB, 2012, 14 (04) :254-+
[2]   Which differences do elderly patients present in single-stage treatment for cholecysto-choledocholithiasis? [J].
Bove, A. ;
Di Renzo, R. M. ;
Palone, G. ;
D'Addetta, V. ;
Caldararo, F. ;
Antonopulos, C. ;
Panaccio, P. ;
Chiarini, S. ;
Bongarzoni, G. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2014, 12 :S160-S163
[3]   Therapeutic role of ERCP in the management of suspected common bile duct stones [J].
Carr-Locke, DL .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2002, 56 (06) :S170-S174
[4]   Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration [J].
Chan, D. S. Y. ;
Jain, P. A. ;
Khalifa, A. ;
Hughes, R. ;
Baker, A. L. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2014, 101 (11) :1448-1452
[5]   The Clavien-Dindo Classification of Surgical Complications Five-Year Experience [J].
Clavien, Pierre A. ;
Barkun, Jeffrey ;
de Oliveira, Michelle L. ;
Vauthey, Jean Nicolas ;
Dindo, Daniel ;
Schulick, Richard D. ;
de Santibanes, Eduardo ;
Pekolj, Juan ;
Slankamenac, Ksenija ;
Bassi, Claudio ;
Graf, Rolf ;
Vonlanthen, Rene ;
Padbury, Robert ;
Cameron, John L. ;
Makuuchi, Masatoshi .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2009, 250 (02) :187-196
[6]   Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration versus open surgery: comparative prospective randomized trial [J].
Grubnik, V. V. ;
Tkachenko, A. I. ;
Ilyashenko, V. V. ;
Vorotyntseva, K. O. .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2012, 26 (08) :2165-2171
[7]   Outcomes of Laparoscopic vs Open Common Bile Duct Exploration: Analysis of the NSQIP Database [J].
Halawani, Hamzeh M. ;
Tamim, Hani ;
Khalifeh, Farah ;
Mailhac, Aurelie ;
Taher, Ali ;
Hoballah, Jamal ;
Jamali, Faek R. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2017, 224 (05) :833-+
[8]   Management of common bile duct stones [J].
Hungness, ES ;
Soper, NJ .
JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2006, 10 (04) :612-619
[9]   Efficacy and safety of endoscopic procedures for common bile duct stones in patients aged 85 years or older: A retrospective study [J].
Iida, Tomoya ;
Kaneto, Hiroyuki ;
Wagatsuma, Kohei ;
Sasaki, Hajime ;
Naganawa, Yumiko ;
Nakagaki, Suguru ;
Satoh, Shuji ;
Shimizu, Haruo ;
Nakase, Hiroshi .
PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (01)
[10]   Endoscopic papillary balloon dilation for the management of bile duct stones in patients 85 years of age and older [J].
Ito, Yukiko ;
Tsujino, Takeshi ;
Togawa, Osamu ;
Yamamoto, Natsuyo ;
Isayama, Hiroyuki ;
Nakata, Ryo ;
Kawabe, Takao ;
Omata, Masao .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2008, 68 (03) :477-482